Well, we can safely say that woke just sank to a whole new depth!
Well, we can safely say that woke just sank to a whole new depth!
Damn those 50 yr old white ex military submarine commanders with their experience in emergency situation. Nah having a 22yr old that needs a crying room and his pronouns correctly stated is much better. Sorry for saying “his” i hope i didn’t offend anyone.Well, we can safely say that woke just sank to a whole new depth!
The engineering worked.
What a lot of nonsense. The sub was being piloted by the CEO Stockton Rush, not some 22yo 'sissy' as you imagine in your dreams.Damn those 50 yr old white ex military submarine commanders with their experience in emergency situation. Nah having a 22yr old that needs a crying room and his pronouns correctly stated is much better. Sorry for saying “his” i hope i didn’t offend anyone.
Which regulatory body is it that licenses and inspects submarines intended to be operated in international waters by privately owned companies?What a lot of nonsense. The sub was being piloted by the CEO Stockton Rush, not some 22yo 'sissy' as you imagine in your dreams.
Those wanting to wage their 'war on woke' based on the CEO's previous comments should wind their neck in a bit at this early stage. We don't know what has happened yet, and their are almost endless facets and possibilities at play.
Details of the subs design and construction taken from Wikipedia.
Titan (4000 meters)Edit
Design and constructionEdit
OceanGate began developing a composite carbon fiber and titanium-hulled submersible in collaboration with the University of Washington's (UW) Applied Physics Lab (APL) in 2013,[15] tentatively named Cyclops 2; the first titanium structural components were ordered in December 2016 from Titanium Fabrication Corp. (TiFab),[17] and OceanGate signed a contract with Spencer Composites in January 2017 for the carbon-composite cylinder. Spencer previously had built the composite pressure hull for the single-person DeepFlight Challenger for Steve Fossett to a design by Graham Hawkes
Its clear that the process isn't all in the hands of the 'woke brigade' and even if it was there may well have been a regulatory failing here. It appears that this sub was diving with no official certification of its construction by a regulatory body. Why is this happening?
If this company is leaving control of such expeditions in the hands of 22yo 'bed wetters', then perhaps there is another regulatory failing which has nothing to do with woke.
Which regulatory body is it that licenses and inspects submarines intended to be operated in international waters by privately owned companies?
If that were my business and they were willing pay the premium ... sure. It would be foolish not to. My brother spent many years as a member of a Lloyd's syndicate. They issued all sorts of coverage for risky ventures. That was exactly how they made their moneys. You don't think those tankers traveling through pirate controlled coastal African waters are uninsured? Of course they are. Lloyd's doesn't just insure things like Betty Grable's legs.The overhead and other costs of the operator must be staggering. I doubt they carry insurance, or could. Would you insure them?
Piloted and built by are different.What a lot of nonsense. The sub was being piloted by the CEO Stockton Rush, not some 22yo 'sissy' as you imagine in your dreams.
Those wanting to wage their 'war on woke' based on the CEO's previous comments should wind their neck in a bit at this early stage. We don't know what has happened yet, and their are almost endless facets and possibilities at play.
Details of the subs design and construction taken from Wikipedia.
Titan (4000 meters)Edit
Design and constructionEdit
OceanGate began developing a composite carbon fiber and titanium-hulled submersible in collaboration with the University of Washington's (UW) Applied Physics Lab (APL) in 2013,[15] tentatively named Cyclops 2; the first titanium structural components were ordered in December 2016 from Titanium Fabrication Corp. (TiFab),[17] and OceanGate signed a contract with Spencer Composites in January 2017 for the carbon-composite cylinder. Spencer previously had built the composite pressure hull for the single-person DeepFlight Challenger for Steve Fossett to a design by Graham Hawkes
Its clear that the process isn't all in the hands of the 'woke brigade' and even if it was there may well have been a regulatory failing here. It appears that this sub was diving with no official certification of its construction by a regulatory body. Why is this happening?
If this company is leaving control of such expeditions in the hands of 22yo 'bed wetters', then perhaps there is another regulatory failing which has nothing to do with woke.
The more I hear about it the more red flags get thrown up and we all take risks but some are just foolish. It reminds me of the investments that are too good to be true and people who know better invest thinking they won't get burnt.Or dreamers! Serious hobbyists. Risk takers. People with a sense of adventure. There's a whole spectrum of people who would pay money, not much money at that in today's world, for risky adventures.
Which basically makes this whole "woke" thing, for or against, irrelevant.View attachment 228831
That virtue signaling worldview has more in common with religion than physical science.
Problem is, Mother Nature does not debate philosophy or human feelings/emotion.
She's a right bitch in that regard.
Look up "Kara Hultgreen" to see an aviation analog of this submersible debacle.
Or why Boeing continues to miss deliveries of 737 MAX and 787 jets.
The physical world does not give the slightest shit about human affairs, ideals, passions, sources of pride, sources of guilt, ideas about justice, or anything else.
Never has, and never will.
Crunch the numbers RIGHT, or die.
The end.
All I see when I read “carbon composite” is the head on my latest driver. Maybe not relevant but not confidence inspiring to me.What a lot of nonsense. The sub was being piloted by the CEO Stockton Rush, not some 22yo 'sissy' as you imagine in your dreams.
Those wanting to wage their 'war on woke' based on the CEO's previous comments should wind their neck in a bit at this early stage. We don't know what has happened yet, and their are almost endless facets and possibilities at play.
Details of the subs design and construction taken from Wikipedia.
Titan (4000 meters)Edit
Design and constructionEdit
OceanGate began developing a composite carbon fiber and titanium-hulled submersible in collaboration with the University of Washington's (UW) Applied Physics Lab (APL) in 2013,[15] tentatively named Cyclops 2; the first titanium structural components were ordered in December 2016 from Titanium Fabrication Corp. (TiFab),[17] and OceanGate signed a contract with Spencer Composites in January 2017 for the carbon-composite cylinder. Spencer previously had built the composite pressure hull for the single-person DeepFlight Challenger for Steve Fossett to a design by Graham Hawkes
Its clear that the process isn't all in the hands of the 'woke brigade' and even if it was there may well have been a regulatory failing here. It appears that this sub was diving with no official certification of its construction by a regulatory body. Why is this happening?
If this company is leaving control of such expeditions in the hands of 22yo 'bed wetters', then perhaps there is another regulatory failing which has nothing to do with woke.
If that were my business and they were willing pay the premium ... sure. It would be foolish not to. My brother spent many years as a member of a Lloyd's syndicate. They issued all sorts of coverage for risky ventures. That was exactly how they made their moneys. You don't think those tankers traveling through pirate controlled coastal African waters are uninsured? Of course they are. Lloyd's doesn't just insure things like Betty Grable's legs.
Now whether the submersible's owner would purchase insurance, that's another question. The passengers on the vessel could have purchased their own coverage if they wished.
Actually the structural factor of safety for (manned) aircraft is 1.5 or 150%. A 50% margin above the very highest loads expected.Bridges, buildings, balconies etc can withstand several times their maximum capacity, while airplanes for example operate within 20% margin.
Actually the structural factor of safety for (manned) aircraft is 1.5 or 150%. A 50% margin above the very highest loads expected.
Some parts of an aircraft are required to be sized to factors above that.
Ren