To follow up on Ashdigger's comments, there are many things of concern here. Having an undergraduate degree in structural engineering, the thought of designing anything right up to its failure point is frightening.
One would not calculate the potential maximum loads for a bridge and design that bridge to only hold those calculated loads. Typically, significant factors of safety are engineered into the final product.
For example, if I were designing a submersible craft that had an anticipated dive depth of 4000 meters, I would want it designed to handle pressures for maybe 1.5x to 2x that depth. Also, the craft is only as strong as the weakest part or component. I have no expertise at all in deep water diving, but a carbon fiber hull with the end cap epoxied in place seem a bit concerning.
At least from what I've read, the craft had not been properly tested at those depths with the maximum anticipated passenger load. Also, the fact that control of the vessel was via a wireless game controller without some type of secondary, hardwired redundant control system built in is also alarming.
Were there systems in place that would accurately measure and mitigate the levels of O2, CO2 and CO? If so, had these been properly tested and evaluated? They claimed to have life support systems for 96 hours. What was this based on? Was it ever put to the test?
Not learning from the lessons that have been written in blood by those who have gone before us is also of concern. Perhaps the CEO realized the push back he would have received from those who have expertise in the subject matter and decided to avoid their counsel.
At any rate, a tragic circumstance and chain of events. God bless all those involved.
One would not calculate the potential maximum loads for a bridge and design that bridge to only hold those calculated loads. Typically, significant factors of safety are engineered into the final product.
For example, if I were designing a submersible craft that had an anticipated dive depth of 4000 meters, I would want it designed to handle pressures for maybe 1.5x to 2x that depth. Also, the craft is only as strong as the weakest part or component. I have no expertise at all in deep water diving, but a carbon fiber hull with the end cap epoxied in place seem a bit concerning.
At least from what I've read, the craft had not been properly tested at those depths with the maximum anticipated passenger load. Also, the fact that control of the vessel was via a wireless game controller without some type of secondary, hardwired redundant control system built in is also alarming.
Were there systems in place that would accurately measure and mitigate the levels of O2, CO2 and CO? If so, had these been properly tested and evaluated? They claimed to have life support systems for 96 hours. What was this based on? Was it ever put to the test?
Not learning from the lessons that have been written in blood by those who have gone before us is also of concern. Perhaps the CEO realized the push back he would have received from those who have expertise in the subject matter and decided to avoid their counsel.
At any rate, a tragic circumstance and chain of events. God bless all those involved.