My feelings about very expensive pipes are very ambivalent.
I believe that it is impossible to evaluate them without being influenced by their purportedly elite status. Well, Manduela was trained by Poul Ilsted. Since he was great, Mandela must be/perhaps is great. Also Ilsted's pipes are expensive. Perhaps Manduela's are justifiably expensive. You may say that you can consider her pipes objectively nonetheless. I say you cannot.
Nor can I. A further bias against these towering prices, which seem to me self-indulgent (to me to me to me) , both for the maker and the carver, their value one part true to three parts pipe-hype. My problem (my problem, my/my/my, my problem) is that claims about a certain maker's pipes are only valid by the judgment of your experience alone. I cannot have your experience. Unless and until the judgment of your palate can be mine, your findings are unreliable. One's pipe experiences (continued below)