Thanks - that's very good to hear!Number six, you will not be disappointed with that Bushmills 21. I took a bottle down to Baja the first time I drove down towing a boat, and we enjoyed that bottle all the more after catching lots of fish. Setting in the heat of Baja with that bottle of Bushmills 21 was just an unforgettable memory. It was a week to recall on long winter evenings.
:DWelcome to the fold, Brother Six
The big one is the smoky flavor, as the malted barley is roasted over burning peat before being mashed. There's one brand, Glengoyne, that doesn't actually use peat at all - it's a good point of comparison (and a decent Scotch, despite the lack of peat). Depending on the local composition of the peat, you'll get other subtle flavors as well.What kind of flavor does peat impart in the scotch?
I am not a expert drinker of whisky, but I was watching Rick Steves (travel writer) visiting a Whisky distillery in Scotland (maybe it was Ireland). He was given a sample of whisky with nothing added, and then one with a splash of water.mike, a few drops of water open up the single malt...
Since I decided to get a good whisky, I did some research. One article emphasized "there's no wrong way to drink whisky", neat, rocks, with water or not - only the drinker knows what's best for themselves.I'm a dedicated drinker (not a drunk or alcoholic, as I said before, fully functioning lush), but I guess not really an educated drinker, so I didn't know that particular bit of info. I'll try it, see the difference for myself. I have to say, though, I've never believed in polluting good whiskey with water in any amount and I'm terrified I'll waste a glass of good scotch
lol!But I will try it. Unfortunately, I have to wait until it's dark so I can maintain the label of "functional lush" and don't end up as an alcoholic by definition....