By soaked in Propylenglycol I mean that, as you know and due to the great problem that occurred with your tobaccos between 2018 and 2019, which arrived completely moldy (I attach photos) or completely dry, you have decided to impregnate your tobacco in this type of alcohol (Propylenglycol) in indecent amounts, so much so that cans without vacuum packaging maintain their moisture, so much so that tobacco when it is "dry" seems to remain moist.
During those years; 2018, 2019, 2020... coincidentally, your cans changed, according to close sources your European can supplier retired and you decided to cut costs by ordering the cans from China, a fatal mistake instead of looking for a local or European can supplier. As you already know, the problem with these Chinese cans is that they are made of a much softer metal and of poorer quality and lose their vacuum over time... The packaging machine does not work well, you said... You know, from Spain, there were hundreds of complaints and cans returned... dozens of 250g packages returned to the tobacconists...
You even went so far as to put glue inside the cans (photo attached) so that they would not lose the vacuum packaging... but without success... the cans lost it.
Seeing that it was inevitable, your speech changed, saying that now Samuel Gawith did not manufacture his tobacco prepared for aging, when we all knew that Samuel Gawith had always had tins in perfect condition that endured decades of aging in the cellar.
We, who love tobacco and this noble art above all else, feel sorry and are truly sad to see how a company with so many years of prestige behind it doubles its prices and lowers its quality so much.
It is totally logical that the prices go up... but that the quality be maintained, not that the quality go down. Most veteran pipe smokers in Spain already advocate manufacturers
like Kohlhase & Kopp, more constant and neat, with perfect cans and tobaccos without problems, at lower pric