I know...can't make sense as to why the people at Middleton would mislead us.
Agreed; and the fact the Middleton/Altria/Phillip Morris
claims to have no executive nor managerial-level person assigned to the post/duties of Public Relations/Public Information Officer
- who could clear the air on this question for the public immediately - is something I find highly dubious in it's conception.
As to
WHY Middleton:
a) Is publicly repeating the claim that
No Changes are affecting to the production-status of PA and CH -
except for the claim that they will no longer ship 14oz tubs to the State-of-California ;
and yet,
b) Middleton additionally is claiming
"no explanation for the lack of product availability on the open market." - which was the same
"I DUNNO" answer which was provided directly to me - on 2 separate occasions, by Middleton Reps - when I attempted to probe deeper into this mystery with them.
These two facts defy each other.
Are we really being asked to believe that a giant tobacco conglomerate does not not know why their products are unavailable anywhere on the open-market since mid November; and yet, they have had no changes in production?
It would appear so... either that, or, there is whole bunch of pallets of packaged tobacco missing.
Now, I have 2 theories - I repeat:
THEORIES,
which are wholly unsupported and speculative - which are the only rational I can come up with which to explain what we are being told be Middleton Reps, and, and what we are seeing on the store shelves; so to speak.
Unsupported Theory #1: In an effort to beat the pending deadline which bans flavored tobaccos entering into the State-of-California, Middleton may have, since before NOV2020, diverted the shipments of all production to a central holding facility in California; thereby getting as much product as possible "in, under the wire" as possivble.
Or, try:
Unsupported Theory #2: Middleton -
much like Dunhill, and, Nat Sherman, before them - may have elected to get out of the production/distribution of their pipe tobaccos; this, in the face of all the pending legislation/crack-down on the production and sale of flavored tobaccos in the United States; and therefore, may be "looking for a buyer at this time".
Whereas Dunhill was able to find a ready buyer for their product-lines and titles in STG/Peterson's -
while Nat Sherman's did not - perhaps Middleton has also elected to get out of flavored tobaccos - which would include anything using Poly Glycol / Glycerine, if even as an unflavored humicant - and is also hoping for a ready buyer - like STG, for example - to step forward with a bid.
If this were the case, the active seller would want to keep the customer-base both in-the-dark, and, on-board with expectancy; less the customers turn to an alternative product in the interim, and thereby devalue the asking price of the lines at the time of sale.
Additional, by stopping production well in advance of the hypothetical sale, if that sale were not to come to fruition, not only would the supply dry up on the shelves - as we have seen - but, the selling businesses would not have a factory full of processed tobacco on their hands - which they would still need to sell and distribute - and thereby keep them in the game longer than they wish to be.
By stopping production in advance of 'getting out', not only is the sale cleaner - as one does not have to negotiate the sale and distribution of tons of processed tobaccos - but, in the event of 'no sale', the seller is 'out', and with 'clean hands' - with no product to dispose of.
Again, there are just MY theories -
and they are unsupported - in an attempt to understand
WHY we are seeing one thing on the shelves, and yet, hearing another thing from the Middleton Reps.
Neither of which jibe with each other. That much we know as
Fact. -
Sherm Natman