The economist in me says there is no real difference. Demand clearly outstrips supply, and with anything of that ilk, that will lead to price increases, either through retail channels or through speculators. What pisses me off is that the speculators are making most of the profit. Esoterica should be making most of it, since they are making the product that all of us covet. I don't want to revisit the discussion we had in my infamous Stonehaven thread, which led to all sorts of bitterness and acrimony, but I do believe that a rise in price at the esoterica level would reduce demand and drive some of the speculators out of the market, and we would all be better off for it in the long run. Just my opinion, and one that is not universally shared by others.Differentiate between "gouging", "profiteering", and legitimate "supply and demand" price increases
Esoterica should be making most of it, since they are making the product that all of us covet.
You are not alone in your thoughts Peck. There has been enough dirtbags taking all the $25 bags from internet retailers with no intention of anything else besides selling it for $100. Raising the price to $50 a bag may just leave some for the guy who really wants to smoke it and he won't have to pay $100 for a bag anymore. Besides, does anyone really think Esoterica blends should be priced LOWER than Drew Estates MSRP?I do believe that a rise in price at the esoterica level would reduce demand and drive some of the speculators out of the market, and we would all be better off for it in the long run. Just my opinion, and one that is not universally shared by others.
:rofl:This must be one of the exciting changes that Russ promised in the wake of the Habana buyout by Cigars Int'l. :lol: