It is a tough deal anyway you look at it. I would suspect the owners of the ship will have to pay for all damages and the lives lost. Somehow you know ship's Captain going to have to pay the price for this incident.
I like this quote from the article:Thank you, very informative!
It is a tough deal anyway you look at it. I would suspect the owners of the ship will have to pay for all damages and the lives lost. Somehow you know ship's Captain going to have to pay the price for this incident.
Yeah, that really doesn't work for a 115,000 ton vessel dropping a hook at speed into a muddy bottom. If doing so worked I'll eat my captain's hat!Clubhauling
If the port anchor was dropped, that likely explains the sudden swerve into the bridge, when the anchor bit.
It's surely impossible to aportion any level of blame prior to conclusion of any investigation. I am no expert, but can only imagine the complexity of maritime insurance. There are multiple facets to this incident.It is a tough deal anyway you look at it. I would suspect the owners of the ship will have to pay for all damages and the lives lost. Somehow you know ship's Captain going to have to pay the price for this incident.
Tugs could have saved the day, but it's also possible they could have altered course by only a small bit.Hell I rember when on my Dads shrimp boat trying to stop , full astern was not on a dime, imagine a colossal,thing like that container ship, history on that ship should have been 2 tugs on standby near the bridge. I Garronte!
I suspect a group of insurers will be footing the bill, Lloyds of London quite possibly.I would suspect the owners of the ship will have to pay for all damages and the lives lost
Didn't say it would, just the name of the maneuver. I'd be surprised if it didn't rip that side of the ship out.Yeah, that really doesn't work for a 115,000 ton vessel dropping a hook at speed into a muddy bottom.
My dad told a story about a "hot shot" fishing boat captain coming to dock at speed. He liked to call for reverse and spin the wheel so the vessel settled nicely parallel to the wharf. He called for reverse and ... the engine responded with a cough and then silence. The boat came to rest, jammed between piling, the dock inches from the wheelhouse.
I suspect a group of insurers will be footing the bill, Lloyds of London quite possibly.
Keeping everyone on the ship is standard for a marine incident. It's no worse than them being confined to the ship when it's underway in the middle of the ocean.The ship’s captain is a foreign national of a Singapore flagged ship owned my a Denmark shipping company in international waters.
That’s why since 1789 America puts an American pilot on those big ships until it clears the harbor.
The proper authorities have confined all the crew to the ship. My wife thinks that’s awful.
I think they need to stay there, for now.
Didn't imply that you said it would!Didn't say it would, just the name of the maneuver. I'd be surprised if it didn't rip that side of the ship out.
I'm sure by the time the NTSB finishes the report they will find a way to blame the Coast Guard.Not necessarily... if the port anchor was dropped, and bit (even if it was dragged), the stern would have swung starboard, not the bow... especially if at speed.
The video shows the opposite, a hard turn to starboard at the bow. That leads me to think that power and propulsion may have been restored, but steering may have still been having an issue... or, the rudders just didn't have time to catch up with the mass of the ship.
Either way. I'm looking forward to seeing the outcome of the investigation.