Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore collapses.

Log in

SmokingPipes.com Updates

Watch for Updates Twice a Week

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

Drucquers Banner

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

kcghost

Lifer
May 6, 2011
15,141
25,691
77
Olathe, Kansas
It is a tough deal anyway you look at it. I would suspect the owners of the ship will have to pay for all damages and the lives lost. Somehow you know ship's Captain going to have to pay the price for this incident.
 

JOHN72

Lifer
Sep 12, 2020
5,828
57,288
51
Spain - Europe
They say that if I had dropped anchor, I might have slowed down in time. At least that's what an acquaintance told me, who was working with merchant ships. I don't know if this is effective at a time of such gravity. I don't understand anything about ships or navigation. Damn it.
 
Last edited:

Briar Lee

Lifer
Sep 4, 2021
4,960
14,335
Humansville Missouri
It is a tough deal anyway you look at it. I would suspect the owners of the ship will have to pay for all damages and the lives lost. Somehow you know ship's Captain going to have to pay the price for this incident.

The ship’s captain is a foreign national of a Singapore flagged ship owned my a Denmark shipping company in international waters.

That’s why since 1789 America puts an American pilot on those big ships until it clears the harbor.


The proper authorities have confined all the crew to the ship. My wife thinks that’s awful.

I think they need to stay there, for now.:)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Carol and JOHN72

Streeper541

Lifer
Jun 16, 2021
3,179
20,160
44
Spencer, OH
If the port anchor was dropped, that likely explains the sudden swerve into the bridge, when the anchor bit.

Not necessarily... if the port anchor was dropped, and bit (even if it was dragged), the stern would have swung starboard, not the bow... especially if at speed.

The video shows the opposite, a hard turn to starboard at the bow. That leads me to think that power and propulsion may have been restored, but steering may have still been having an issue... or, the rudders just didn't have time to catch up with the mass of the ship.

Either way. I'm looking forward to seeing the outcome of the investigation.
 

gubbyduffer

Can't Leave
May 25, 2021
495
1,610
Peebles, Scottish Borders
It is a tough deal anyway you look at it. I would suspect the owners of the ship will have to pay for all damages and the lives lost. Somehow you know ship's Captain going to have to pay the price for this incident.
It's surely impossible to aportion any level of blame prior to conclusion of any investigation. I am no expert, but can only imagine the complexity of maritime insurance. There are multiple facets to this incident.
 

jpmcwjr

Lifer
May 12, 2015
26,280
30,314
Carmel Valley, CA
Hell I rember when on my Dads shrimp boat trying to stop , full astern was not on a dime, imagine a colossal,thing like that container ship, history on that ship should have been 2 tugs on standby near the bridge. I Garronte!
Tugs could have saved the day, but it's also possible they could have altered course by only a small bit.

Engines full astern still takes forever to stop 115,000 tons.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pappymac

warren

Lifer
Sep 13, 2013
12,304
18,346
Foothills of the Chugach Range, AK
My dad told a story about a "hot shot" fishing boat captain coming to dock at speed. He liked to call for reverse and spin the wheel so the vessel settled nicely parallel to the wharf. He called for reverse and ... the engine responded with a cough and then silence. The boat came to rest, jammed between piling, the dock inches from the wheelhouse.

I would suspect the owners of the ship will have to pay for all damages and the lives lost
I suspect a group of insurers will be footing the bill, Lloyds of London quite possibly.
 

Chasing Embers

Captain of the Black Frigate
Nov 12, 2014
44,950
117,288
Yeah, that really doesn't work for a 115,000 ton vessel dropping a hook at speed into a muddy bottom.
Didn't say it would, just the name of the maneuver. I'd be surprised if it didn't rip that side of the ship out.
 

Briar Lee

Lifer
Sep 4, 2021
4,960
14,335
Humansville Missouri
My dad told a story about a "hot shot" fishing boat captain coming to dock at speed. He liked to call for reverse and spin the wheel so the vessel settled nicely parallel to the wharf. He called for reverse and ... the engine responded with a cough and then silence. The boat came to rest, jammed between piling, the dock inches from the wheelhouse.


I suspect a group of insurers will be footing the bill, Lloyds of London quite possibly.



The first concern is six foreign nationals who were construction workers on the bridge are dead, and if they are not properly documented watch the hammer of the Lord fall on whoever hired them.

But since the bridge is owned by Maryland we hope the contractor used eVerify. If so the Maryland Worker’s Compensation system will immediately pick up the tab for an employment accident.


As to ultimate liability of who pays for the ship and cargo and the damages to the bridge, it will be determined by maritime law in the District Court of Maryland.


This may be the most expensive maritime event in history.

 
  • Like
Reactions: Carol and jpberg

pappymac

Lifer
Feb 26, 2015
3,552
5,042
Slidell, LA
The ship’s captain is a foreign national of a Singapore flagged ship owned my a Denmark shipping company in international waters.

That’s why since 1789 America puts an American pilot on those big ships until it clears the harbor.


The proper authorities have confined all the crew to the ship. My wife thinks that’s awful.

I think they need to stay there, for now.:)
Keeping everyone on the ship is standard for a marine incident. It's no worse than them being confined to the ship when it's underway in the middle of the ocean.

You also mentioned the cost of this incident. It may turn out to be the most expensive but I'm thinking the Exxon Valdez may still be the most expensive.

If the Texas City Disaster of 1947 was classified as a maritime incident instead of industrial accident (the fire started on a French registered vessel loaded with over 2,000 tons of ammonia nitrate. I think it would be right up there in overall cost. I've read several books about it and the photos of the aftermath have been compared to the photos of Nagasaki after the atomic bomb was dropped.
 
Last edited:

jpmcwjr

Lifer
May 12, 2015
26,280
30,314
Carmel Valley, CA
Didn't say it would, just the name of the maneuver. I'd be surprised if it didn't rip that side of the ship out.
Didn't imply that you said it would!

Anchors tend to skid along the bottom if the vessel is moving- at least in my experience in setting anchors. Unless of course, it snags on a huge ledge or other immovable underwater object, then all bets are off- big damage to the bow and side of ship, or if lucky, the chain parts before that.
 

pappymac

Lifer
Feb 26, 2015
3,552
5,042
Slidell, LA
Not necessarily... if the port anchor was dropped, and bit (even if it was dragged), the stern would have swung starboard, not the bow... especially if at speed.

The video shows the opposite, a hard turn to starboard at the bow. That leads me to think that power and propulsion may have been restored, but steering may have still been having an issue... or, the rudders just didn't have time to catch up with the mass of the ship.

Either way. I'm looking forward to seeing the outcome of the investigation.
I'm sure by the time the NTSB finishes the report they will find a way to blame the Coast Guard.
 
  • Like
Reactions: grimpeur

jpberg

Lifer
Aug 30, 2011
3,188
7,449
I work for an outfit that offloads raw materials in Baltimore. We’re lucky that the day prior 45 days worth of material was offloaded.
We have contingency plans, and should be okay.
I wonder about the rest of the Port’s customers.
 

Briar Lee

Lifer
Sep 4, 2021
4,960
14,335
Humansville Missouri
An article on prevention of bridge collapses.


When they put it back they’ll protect it from a similar cargo ship strike.

One question I’d like answered.

The Key bridge was a steel truss bridge with reinforced concrete supports.

Those supports had a lot of weight pressing down on them and were sunk quite a ways deep.

How did a 100,000 ton ship move a concrete support, enough to bring down the bridge?

Normally the support wins any contest between a ship and a bridge, I’d think.:)