The typical state-licensed pilot in the U.S. is the most highly trained mariner in the world. Pilots have either extensive deep-sea or tug experience before they enter pilot training programs or they go through a lengthy (four to seven years) apprenticeship program. In addition to extensive prior experience or detailed instruction in basic shiphandling, pilot trainees undergo long periods of route specific training under the guidance of experienced pilots. This hands-on training is supplemented with the latest in classroom instruction and simulator training. Once a pilot receives a license, he or she undergoes regular continuing training, including training in bridge resource management for pilots, emergency shiphandling, and new navigation technology, as well as other types of instruction and practice on full mission bridge simulators and manned models. Each state pilot is expected to be comfortable with the latest in navigation technology and ships' systems. |
Competition |
Each state limits the number of pilot licenses that it issues to the number required to maintain a safe and efficient pilotage service. There is no competition among state pilots. Each port or waterway area is served by one pilot association or one regulated rotation system. The pilotage system in the U.S. recognizes that there are important safety and efficiency reasons for not having competitive pilotage. In the United States, compulsory pilotage is considered navigation safety regulation. Although the state pilot is not an employee of the government or the port, the pilot performs a public service in which the pilot is expected to protect the waters where he or she operates by preventing ships from engaging in unsafe operations. That means that pilots are expected to exercise independent professional judgment, which they would not be able to do if they had to compete for business. PILOTAGE IN THE UNITED STATESPilotage of international trade vessels in the United States is regulated by the individual states, each of which maintains a pilotage system that is suited to the particular needs and circumstances of its own waters. In 1789, the first Congress of the United States enacted a law giving the...
www.americanpilots.org
|
Thanks mate, fully understand and great article. I know here in Oz it's pilots to open water because cargo ship captains just don't know the waterways, harbours and ports like the pilot does, its a safety mechanism against this sort of thing. It will be very interesting what changes get implemented after the thousands of meetings that will be had about this incident.I'm not familiar enough with the port operations of Baltimore Harbor to give you an informed comment. Usage of guide boats, Pilots, & those sorta of things vary from port to port. I'd hate to make an assumption or speculate.
Here's an interesting article I found which some might enjoy reading. Business Insider - Modern Cargo Vessel vs. 45 Year Old Infrastructure
@Streeper541 this is such a tragedy but I note the vessel is under its own power and unattended by a tug, normal in enclosed waters for such a large vessel? I assume the vessel would have been in the hands of a pilot too since it's still in enclosed waters but I don't see a pilot vessel either, once again is this normal?
I have a mate who is a pilot here in the port at Burnie so I'm acutely aware or what they do, the training, commitment and knowledge they hold. It would be terribly hard if the vessel was incapacitated in any way and the only way to rectify a situation like that would of been tug's and a couple of large ones too because you don't stop 100,000 tones on a dime................The pilot was on the bridge.
By chance, I suppose, Coxswain Urban Herschel Marlow from Humansville Missouri was at the helm of the USS Arizona on the morning of December 7, 1941 at Pearl Harbor.
(It wasn’t his fault. )
Urban Herschel Marlow (1915-1941) - Find a Grave...
Local man among fatalities of Pearl Harbor Attack. Dec. 7 2016 marked the 75th Anniversary of the Pearl Harbor attack which took place on a Sunday morning of 1941. The Imperial Japanese Navy attacked the American Army and Navy base in Pearl Harbor, Hawaii. The attack came by complete...www.findagrave.com
I’ve known about the incredible skills needed and devotion to service every pilot of a large ship has all of my life.
Had there not been a cascade of failures beyond the control of the pilot on the Dali she’d have never hit the Key Bridge.
The Dali was a Singapore flagged ship. No way there was a Singaporean in control of a 100,000 ton (four times larger than the USS Arizona) ship traveling nearly 10 knots at night in a narrow shipping channel transiting to the ocean. No way.
Only after the Dali had cleared the harbor would she have dropped the pilot to a little boat to return home.
I have a mate who is a pilot here in the port at Burnie so I'm acutely aware or what they do, the training, commitment and knowledge they hold. It would be terribly hard if the vessel was incapacitated in any way and the only way to rectify a situation like that would of been tug's and a couple of large ones too because you don't stop 100,000 tones on a dime................
When she lost power, it may be that the rudder froze so a slight turn to starboard became a fatality; she should have been turning to port. She was way out of the outbound lane when it was too late.
And 8.5 knots seems awfully fast for conditions. Even if both anchors were delployed the second power was lost, it wouldn't have slowed 115,000 tons in time.
I am suprised that the rudder didn't have its own hydraulic power. (An assumption of course.)
How awful for the victims and family- but all of Maryland is now a mess.
Since you asked....A maritime casualty is when a ship suffers a debilitating circumstance such as loss of power, loss of propulsion, or even loss of steering. They occur far more frequently then I think the general public understands. Because of this, and the danger it presents, we trained for these things in the Coast Guard very regularly. This type of training is also part of the annual schedule of drills that all Mariners must perform onboard their ships.
My specialty, which I won't go deep into, was CBRNE and Counter Terrorism Operations/ Emergency Management. One of the response plans that I helped develop with FEMA about 15 years ago detailed a situation similar to this one, albeit without a bridge collapse...
My wife happens to be a 20-year Marine Safety Inspector with the Coast Guard, and if she was in Baltimore... this would be her case to investigate. Her and I both noticed some of the same things in the video, and have spoken to a few of our Coastie friends in Baltimore and the surrounding area. We all agree the incident, while tragic, seems to be a terrible accident which occurred at the exact worst location it could have. It seems to be the case that everyone on board the ship, at the VTS (Coast Guard manned vessel traffic system), a local traffic authorities did everything within their power to prevent catastrophe. It just wasn't enough.
I'm sure @pappymac will also chime in since he's also a former Coasties and may have some experience in this area. I'd like to hear what he has to say too.
Dropping an anchor at speed (ca. 8 kgs.) onto a soft bottom river bed is indeed no more effective than pissing in the ocean. And it would not have caused the vessel to change course even a degree, unless it snagged on a large immoveable object.
One thing no newsies have talked about is the occupants of the several vehicles that plunged to the bottom. Toast. If anyone did escape, he would be on the news blathering about his experience.
I just can't shake the feeling that malfunctioning AI is involved here, in some capacity.
ClubhaulingIf the port anchor was dropped, that likely explains the sudden swerve into the bridge, when the anchor bit.