If this statement by the WSJ wasn't so laughably stupid, and were it not against Forum rules to go into the subject, I could quite easily rip it to shreds."How can legalizing pot while banning nicotine be explained"
If this statement by the WSJ wasn't so laughably stupid, and were it not against Forum rules to go into the subject, I could quite easily rip it to shreds.
Well I guess it didn't stop with menthols. Only a matter of time before they come for us. Cellar up ladies and gentlemen.
Never expect it to stop escalating.Careful, just a simple nudge could make them consider latakia, dark fired, and perique flavored tobacco. Even the sweet casings on nearly all production tobacco could be considered added flavor. Considering that aromatics are 90% of pipe tobacco sales, they go, pipe tobacco will be a thing of the past.
What makes you think I haven't done this a number of times? When a a media outlet makes a decision to alter the purpose of a segment of their operation into a vehicle for ideologically driven propaganda, they don't publish dissenters. I've read and enjoyed the WSJ for many years, but over the last year the editorial content had gone through quite a change.You'll never know until you try!
Saw two good, like-minded takes on tv last night?...just a stupid attempt to distract from everything else going down rn.