Sure, I tend to go for stuff that is rated at least 3/4, then look for the reviews of a handful of posters - besides JimInks - who I know like the same blend types as I do, and then also avoid anything on the Mild to Medium strength and/or taste because I know it'll be hot air for me.
Now on HU, Dan and K&K, HU are really special blends indeed, we know in the forum that K&K have altered some of them (chiefly Director's Cut) but it doesn't detract from the fact they are great. Actually from HU's blends that I like, I like them more than the flagship Director's Cut. Kudos go to the blender in my opinion, he specifies the recipe, leaf types, exact ratios, processes etc, what K&K have to do is follow it to a T. I don't know how blenders and manufacturers deal with varying leaf types from year to year, but it's also a testament to the big operations like MacBaren and STG to offer the exact same blend for 50 years.
Despite the flak they get here lately, I see K&K as a far more advanced operation than Dan, in that they own and make several different brands, and as such can regulate the quality upwards or downwards depending on the target audience of the brand. Dan make some blends I really like, but at the same time have a lot of weirdly named and labelled aromatics.