For me, losing 507 stoved is as bad as losing the old version of Condor Plug.
Yeah I always thought having duplicates under different brands was ridiculous, too bad there isn't much transparency about that. I think it's probably worse with cigars. Codgerdom is a two edged sword because if you only smoke something owned by STG you probably have nothing to worry about for now, but if you smoke something owned by Sutliff then you better find something else soon or be SOL.To answer the original post, yes and no.
No in the sense that their are is a vast variety of tobacco's still available to pipe smokers. Even though it seems like we've lost hundreds of blends, there are some blends that were duplicates. For example Mac Baren brand x may be the exact same blend as STG brand y, so there is no point in packaging the same tobacco in two different tins with two different labels. Eliminating duplicate packaging can save a company a lot of money, so while it seems like we're losing a lot of blends, some of them will still exist under a different label. It sucks losing a favorite blend, but with all the tobacco's on the market their is an opportunity to find a new favorite.
Yes, as we're losing a long standing American company, with employees losing their job, and a community losing an iconic business. Same goes for Mac Baren. Besides employees losing their jobs, a major loss is the machines that made these tobacco's at both factories. I don't like the idea of these machines being scrapped, as someone that loves history, and antiques; I think these machines/equipment should be saved and put in a museum or on display somewhere to show case the history of the industry. I understand that STG may not have the space to store this equipment, but in my opinion it needs to be save and displayed somehow. It would be a shame to lose such history.
Yes, as a lot of B&M shops rely on the Sutliff bulk and blending tobacco's. It will definitely hurt some of our favorite B&M shops tobacco sales as I would bet that most pipe shops sell more bulk blends than blends in tins. While there is still an opportunity for these B&M shops to acquire bulk and blending tobacco's from other manufacturer's; a lot of regulars (codgers) that smoke only a handful of B&M shop blends won't like the change.
Yeah I always thought having duplicates under different brands was ridiculous, too bad there isn't much transparency about that. I think it's probably worse with cigars. Codgerdom is a two edged sword because if you only smoke something owned by STG you probably have nothing to worry about for now, but if you smoke something owned by Sutliff then you better find something else soon or be SOL.
Yeah I'm bummed there's a bunch of MacB and Sutliff stuff I planned on trying but now probably never will but there's still tons of other stuff to explore. Hell some companies I was never particularly interested in trying but now I want to because they need our support. I was always more interested in trying new stuff over having favorites and between a big rotation and irregular smoking schedule one tin lasts me a long time.Unfortunately, that is one of the downsides to all of this. For someone like me that smokes a variety of blends it's not a huge loss, as I have plenty of other tobacco's to smoke. It still sucks, but it's not the end of the world for me. However, if you are one of those that only smokes a handful of blends or one blend; whether it be a packaged OTC, or bulk OTC, a bulk blend, or a particular tin tobacco; it does make the loss much greater. Those individuals are going to have a much harder time with this than someone like me.
Mike, it's great to see you on here. I take loooong breaks from the site and haven't seen you on here in quite some time. I hope you are happy and doing well!Within every loss is an opportunity. Yes some ( ok a whole lot ) blends will be gone. On the other hand it forces us to expand our investigation of those that remain. I fully expect, at some time, my favorite blend might disappear. So I must adapt and find an alternative. I will surely be trying blends I have not, in the past. The world is full of oysters, so start looking for pearls.
Honestly for me the idea of buying a tin and letting it sit for years before smoking it is really appealing.Mike, it's great to see you on here. I take loooong breaks from the site and haven't seen you on here in quite some time. I hope you are happy and doing well!
As to the OP, yes it is huge. But I am in no position to do anything about it, other than observe. There are some blends I will miss, for sure.
I am more concerned about the new iterations of some of those retained. I love (LOVE) MacB Navy Flake. It needs 5 years to wake up, but it is a magnificent smoke in its current form. I have no idea what a change of factory is going to do to it. I'm hoping I have enough to never have to find out, but we shall see.
Honestly for me the idea of buying a tin and letting it sit for years before smoking it is really appealing
That's awesomeWhen I first started this thing, you could still get tins on eBay. I lucked into some 5 year aged Navy Flake and never looked back. I'm likely set for life, now, but I was buying some each year so I was never out of the aged stuff. I still have 3 of my original eBay tins. They have over 16 years on them now, lol.
With the soon to be ceasing of operations of Mac Baren and Sutliff, I wonder if we are really losing that much. I mean, there are still many other options for essentially similar blends from many other sources. Does anyone find any of the soon to be gone blends that are truly unique?
Anyone believe that Mac B or Sutliff may become the next McClellands? I'm sure that many thought Dunhill would become a unicorn brand, but Peterson came through and brought back many of their blends.
This thread has the list:Do we have clear sight yet on what will survive the cut, I assume some must.
ThanksThis thread has the list:
Just in from STG/MacBaren/Sutliff :: General Pipe Smoking Discussion
Just got this in an email. I guess that means all the tinned tobacco are going away.pipesmagazine.com
13 blends make the cut.
The way you said that, I now feel obligated to stick around and listen for the sound of a single gunshot...Thanks
Ahhh I knew it was bad but gee whizz they have pulled the proverbial pants down and not offered any lube have they I’m glad I have what I need and I just collected from the post another pound of 515 and buttered rum to insulate a little more. I really will have to work on anything Kopp have fingerprints on now too as they are probably the next ones in the gun and they have huge bearing on Pease and C & D going forward so we aren’t out of the woods yet I’d say. One look at this screen shot should get everyone’s pulse racing!The way you said that, I now feel obligated to stick around and listen for the sound of a single gunshot...
I know more then a few older smokers who have the blend. Anything else they won't even try.Yeah I always thought having duplicates under different brands was ridiculous, too bad there isn't much transparency about that. I think it's probably worse with cigars. Codgerdom is a two edged sword because if you only smoke something owned by STG you probably have nothing to worry about for now, but if you smoke something owned by Sutliff then you better find something else soon or be SOL.