[Can you elaborate on this? I'm curious about flicwick. What are the advantages in your view? ]
First of all hempwick has a softer flame, even softer than match. Than you can control the flame even better than a match particularly in relighting a deep bowl where you can put it precisely down the bowl.
The disadvantage is that you need to use something to light it up and here is where the flickwick (or similar hempwick holders) come into play as it is an holder which has a spool of hempwick and a minibic where you can easily light the wick with one hand.
What I like specifically about the flickwick is that with one single hand not only you can light the wick but also you can advance the wick (basically having a flame of unlimited time) but also extinguish the flame putting it back, all with a single hand, it is really like having a functional lighter.
I prefer to use a 2 mm wick instead of the 1mm furnished with the flickwick as a 2 mm wick has the additional benefit of being the most wind resistant at least of the soft flames.
There is a stigma associated with hempwick as it is generally used for other smokable products but I don't care, it works fine with a tobacco pipe.