I think this fact does not get enough focus around here.I took up smoking a pipe almost 15 years ago after I researched the risks to my health, which I found were minimal.
I agree that this is a good starting point for any decision. To this I add that there should be a feedback loop: do it while it offers something to you, and leave it at any point where that ceases.I opine one should simply do a bit of research, make the decision to smoke or not and then, cease trying to make a case about how smart you are to smoke. Just enjoy the pipe or whatever.
I am not sure I can agree that any decision falls under this standard. All things have repercussions, even the entirely personal. While I tend to be libertarian in this regard, including some regulated chemicals, I don't think it's the full story. Standards and leadership are as much part of life as individualism, and are -- in my long-term study -- often more gratifying. A $0.02 for your busy mind to consider, nothing more.Also, the why of some others habits (hobby, if you insist), if legal, are really none of your or my business. We really shouldn't have to justify our nasty little vice to anyone other than ourselves and maybe "herself."
While I can see the point that smoking would be an addition to existing environmental conditions, and therefore those conditions are not relevant, we do have the ability to do something about those toxins, even at a personal level, for example moving to the burbs or countryside instead of living in a city apartment.Industrial toxins, vehicle emissions, etc. really have no logical place in a debate about consciously partaking in smoking and the intentional imperiling your own well being.
.I took up smoking a pipe almost 15 years ago after I researched the risks to my health, which I found were minimal
Tell that to someone who has Peripheral Artery Disease & a candidate for having the arteries in their legs stripped at the least, or at risk of losing a foot or possibly a leg. Peripheral Artery Disease of the lower extremities is not caused by cholesterol, can be caused by Diabetes but is heavily caused by nicotine. One of my best friends lost 2 toes plus a part of the major bone in one of his feet in 2014 because the arteries in his leg were so bad part of his foot died due to lack of circulation. He now has to wear a 5EEEEE wide special shoe. Problems continue and his doctor told him the leg will have to come off. My advise to him has been to get it done, get a prosthesis & get on with his life while there is any of it left.Nicotine is by itself not harmful.
I will add on to what JReb said. Studies have shown a direct correlation between nicotine and degenerative disk disease, and spinal stenosis. Additionally, nicotine will directly impact your ability to heal after major surgery.Nicotine is by itself not harmful.
I understand this perspective, having been there through another form. The Kali-Yuga is upon us, but I think it's nearing the end. So I take hope in that!I'm pretty much a social dropout by choice. I spent a good part of my adult life trying to fix social problems on a personal, face to face level.
I honestly don't know, Metal. Other than reading excerpts, I don't know the details. I know that my doctor--who is far from an anti-Nazi--mentioned them when I had my back surgery. Simply providing information that it could have contributed to the disk degeneration that I had and advising against smoking post surgery for a week just to aid the healing process.Did those studies separate Nicotine from its delivery mechanism and lifestyle options?