It's professionally called, Bullshitery. YMMV.It's obvious he is an attorney and not an engineer. He likes to manipulate the facts to fit his story with a large amount of ambiguous bullshit.
Last edited:
It's professionally called, Bullshitery. YMMV.It's obvious he is an attorney and not an engineer. He likes to manipulate the facts to fit his story with a large amount of ambiguous bullshit.
I've been told there's way to prepare liver that makes it good. I've not experienced that. In college freshman year, when we entered the cafeteria and smelled that it was "liver night", we automatically did a 180 and headed out for "fast food night". The only good thing I've found for livers is as bait for catfish.Maybe. I have such fond memories of my grandma’s chopped chicken liver sandwiches though. It’s another thing entirely I guess. When I was a kid I used to sing, “50 ways to eat chopped liver” as she prepared it in the kitchen. It was heavenly.
Woah. College cooking is so not what i would base a decision on. Liver can taste awful and usually I’d pass. But, there are those who know how to make it sing. The same with chitlins. Pass on it unless you have the right cook.I've been told there's way to prepare liver that makes it good. I've not experienced that. In college freshman year, when we entered the cafeteria and smelled that it was "liver night", we automatically did a 180 and headed out for "fast food night". The only good thing I've found for livers is as bait for catfish.
“Eat the guts, Gus - fry up the spam, Stan - just get yourself free ….”When I was a kid I used to sing, “50 ways to eat chopped liver” as she prepared it in the kitchen. It was heavenly.
I’ve known catfish who had the sense to pass on liver!I've been told there's way to prepare liver that makes it good. I've not experienced that. In college freshman year, when we entered the cafeteria and smelled that it was "liver night", we automatically did a 180 and headed out for "fast food night". The only good thing I've found for livers is as bait for catfish.
You could not be more wrong about that.I wrote out a response... and hit delete instead of "post Reply." Wrote out a second, and did the same. Then a third time. It's really hard expressing how wrong someone can be without giving even an inkling of insult.
Maybe it's your singular wit?I try my best to be witty without being mean, but it really depends on the recipient's intelligence also, as to whether they "get it" or get offended.
I also prefer to make my humor with a touch of self deprecation, putting the butt of the joke back on myself, but also... intelligence. Some people just want yes or no answers, because they can't think very deeply.
I don't mean ol' Briar Lee here. Just the forum in general.
Heck, there have been times I thought that I may have insulted the poster, only to have a few people post for the first time in the thread that they were offended, ha ha. Being funny can be dangerous.
wanna see my my little singular wit?Maybe it's your singular wit?
I’m not reading all that but I looked at your photo. Looks like a clunker to me. A real rooting, tooting, clunking 2 bit piece of shit.In cigarette smokers this is a well known and studied subject:
—-
Compensation for reduced nicotine yield cigarettes is relatively easy because the nicotine content of the tobacco filler (generally between 10 and 15 mg) is similar for normal and low nicotine yield commercial cigarettes. They are considered low yield based on smoking machine testing, which consists of taking a standard number of puffs of fixed duration and at fixed intervals until the cigarettes burn to the filter overwrap. Low-yield commercial cigarettes are engineered to burn more quickly and/or to have greater ventilation via changes in the cigarette paper and/or ventilation holes in the filter, compared with normal nicotine yield cigarettes.2 The smoker can easily compensate by inhaling more deeply, taking more frequent puffs, blocking ventilation holes with fingers or mouth, and/or smoking more cigarettes per day (CPD). Compensation occurs with minimal effort and often without the smoker being aware of the change in behavior.
Compensation for smoking fewer cigarettes per day occurs through similar changes in puff topography. Assuming a cigarette contains 10–15 mg of nicotine, and the smoker takes in a systemic dose of 1 mg nicotine (both typical values), then the bioavailability is only about 6%–10%. A smoker can, by puffing more frequently and more intensively increase bioavailability 3–4 fold, such that a dose of 3–4 mg nicotine can be obtained per cigarette, effectively maintaining nicotine exposure even when the number of cigarettes smoked is reduced.3
—-
The first example of how I “compensate” is that Bob Marx seems to have put a stinger in his pipes when they shipped and occasionally I’ll find one still in the stem. Invariably I’ll pull it out, before smoking. Those stingers seem to reduce Vitamin N, or at least they were sold under that promise, and I want more nicotine.
The second way I may compensate is all that old advice about maintaining a cake the thickness of a dime has long, long ago been abandoned when I get in a pipe. For whatever reason, I think it’s because they are soft, I know and do not merely think a Pre 54 Marxman will shed all it’s cake leaving a dark brown bowl with only a few twists of a pocket knife.
What I’m doing is removing a highly absorbent layer of pure carbon.
The third way I compensate is like any other long experienced pipe smoker does. I never get tongue bite. My pipes don’t ever gurgle. And once I get one fired up it’s not likely to go out, and I can tell without any trouble when to tamp it.
The best part is down there at the bottom waiting for the last, dying ember.
Yet I can still remember brushing my teeth and my mouth on fire, the morning after. And even today if I get a brand spanking new Nording it’s liable to start to bite my tongue if I’d let it. And on my beloved Marxman pipes in which I am very well pleased, when I get that first hiccup, I don’t want my wife laughing at me like she did when I powdered up Cotton Bowl Twist and got nicotine drunk, sitting there grinning and hiccuping. I’ll subconsciously back off and enjoy the smoke, but not get intoxicated with nicotine.
This morning looking at my latest Big Boy, four smokes colored it noticeably on the outside and that is something I’ve come to expect from any high condition Marxman.
If that was a low yield cigarette I’d have puffed it harder to get the same nicotine yield.
So my working theory today, is that the superior insulation of Algerian briar allows me to puff a little faster, or harder, or maybe both in combination because the outside of the pipe is more difficult to get hot, and thereby I get more nicotine and flavor.
Whatever it is, I feel sorry for folks who haven’t discovered Marxman pipes yet.
And even sorrier for folks that collect them like postage stamps and will let the next owner smoke them after they’ve gone on to green pastures.
View attachment 256525View attachment 256526View attachment 256527
I’ve counted ten flaws and fills in that Big Boy that would have kept it from being sold as a Kaywoodie or Lee.
Algerian briar had to have been cheaper.
A good rumination!Any chance there is a chemical/pH difference? Like maybe this briar or the mysterious curing technique leaves the pipe a little more basic than otherwise, so the smoke ends up more alkaline and delivers more nicotine?
Just spit-ballin'...