Sort of partially, maybe, reasonable. People love having something that's very limited, and the Dunhill rejects would certainly fall under that category. And there are people who knowingly buy fakes because they find it oddly amusing.About the only buyers the maker of a counterfeit White Spot NOT FOR SALE pipe could hope to deceive, would be people so knowledgeable about a Dunhill, they knew about NOT FOR SALE gift pipes which are overstamps.
They’d think it was a fake.
The unsophisticated buyer would expect it to not have NOT FOR SALE and instead have regular Dunhill stamps.
Really knowledgeable Dunhill folks would know it's a fake in a New York minute.
So, this fake is for the "a little knowledge can be a dangerous thing" group of folks. Because, IF they were REALLY knowledgeable, they would know that the lack of normal nomenclature, which is added earlier in the manufacturing process, would be proof of fakery.
But this also raises a question about the forger. Was he knowledgeable enough about Dunhills to know that they gave away a certain number of "NOT FOR SALE" pipes, but not knowledgeable enough to know that all of the Genuine "NOT FOR SALE" pipes had the "NOT FOR SALE" stamp struck over the normal nomenclature?
Or was he limited to this expediency because he could not duplicate the Actual Dunhill stamps, whereas the much less familiar "NOT FOR SALE" stamp would be accepted without so much as a second glance. And why even bother to put a "NOT FOR SALE" stamp on a pipe with no nomenclature, a "no-name" pipe? The purpose of the "NOT FOR SALE" stamp was in no small measure to obliterate the approved nomenclature.
Such mysteries abound and we may never know for sure whether this was a genuine fake or a fake fake. Maybe the stem was stolen off of a genuine Dunhill, left momentarily unattended in some biergarten while its owner left to relieve himself. Maybe the stem's a Dunhill stem removed from that very pipe. Would that make the pipe a genuine fake or a fake fake. Or is there another term that would better apply in this instance, like genuine fake fake?