Why is Magnum Opus Just Magnum Now?

Log in

SmokingPipes.com Updates

Watch for Updates Twice a Week

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

Drucquers Banner

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

dburrows

Starting to Get Obsessed
Sep 2, 2011
279
271
So I was browsing the H&H line and noticed Magnum Opus dropped the Opus in the name. When did this happen? And, more importantly, did the blend change?

I know Russ used to be on these boards. Not sure if that is still the case.

This is one of my favorite blends so when I saw it, I got concerned.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scottmi

Chasing Embers

Captain of the Black Frigate
Nov 12, 2014
45,265
119,343
So I was browsing the H&H line and noticed Magnum Opus dropped the Opus in the name. When did this happen? And, more importantly, did the blend change?

I know Russ used to be on these boards. Not sure if that is still the case.

This is one of my favorite blends so when I saw it, I got concerned.
It was considered an infringement on the Opus X Arturo Fuente trademark.
 

dburrows

Starting to Get Obsessed
Sep 2, 2011
279
271
Interesting. Well, sounds like the blend itself is safe which is what matters most.

Though I do kind of miss the 'opus' even though I was never that fond of the name, overall.
 

Bbailey324

Lifer
Jun 29, 2023
2,123
27,993
Austin, TX
I supposed it to be a trademark issue but Opus X did not come to mind. That said, I have no idea what is claimed in that trademark so I'm just making noise.
 
  • Like
Reactions: didimauw

anotherbob

Lifer
Mar 30, 2019
16,847
31,595
46
In the semi-rural NorthEastern USA
o.k. so I sorta see their point but that's a complete and total bully move. Basically saying we don't have a leg to stand on but we can force you into a legal battle you can't afford. The fact that it looks like this is the first move and it doesn't look like they tried being nice first means I know one cigar brand I won't bother buying anymore of.
 

anotherbob

Lifer
Mar 30, 2019
16,847
31,595
46
In the semi-rural NorthEastern USA
I supposed it to be a trademark issue but Opus X did not come to mind. That said, I have no idea what is claimed in that trademark so I'm just making noise.
from my understanding it's not and the lawyers probably agree considering they said in "their opinion" instead of saying a more assertive declaration such as it is a violation of their trademark.
 

Servant King

Lifer
Nov 27, 2020
4,819
28,063
39
Frazier Park, CA
www.thechembow.com
Basically saying we don't have a leg to stand on but we can force you into a legal battle you can't afford.
Lawyers say that all the time.

considering they said in "their opinion"
Lawyers say that all the time.

instead of saying a more assertive declaration
Lawyers say that...well, almost never. Assertiveness is basically anathema to the legal profession. Legalese is a funny thing--a word can literally have a dozen different meanings (none of which are the meaning of the word in normal, regular, everyday discourse, naturally) and you can just pick and choose which one you want it to mean to advance whatever agenda is most lucrative.

Ironically, legal opinions frequently have no legal standing. They just make the one offering them up sound more important than they actually are.
 

pantsBoots

Lifer
Jul 21, 2020
2,368
8,999

Geez, the Fuente brand spent decades building up their customer base, made money in the process, then now that it's only Carlito AKA Island Charlie running the show, it's become a brand better suited for rap videos and the TikTok crowd. Hell, I just read his daughter Liana up and quit recently and just a couple years ago, she was the darling that would eventually take over the business.

Don't know what's going on over there, but it's not good and the brand is being abandoned by long-time supporters, including those who used to be very involved in the CF Charitable Foundation. Sad.