What Cigar are You Smoking?

Log in

SmokingPipes.com Updates

Watch for Updates Twice a Week

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

Drucquers Banner
Status
Not open for further replies.
@cshubhra Wouldn't take me long to smoke that cigar in one drag - if it was mine it would just be a stub and a lot of ash!
Downed a full Hamlet cigar in one drag - I must have a good pair of lungs; Man it went down well!
You have a lot of lung power! Smoked slowly though, you get more flavor, more relaxation
 

Scottishgaucho

Part of the Furniture Now
Jan 22, 2020
671
7,183
Buenos Aires Province.
Been a heck of a cold day down this part of the world. Enjoying the second half of this Cienfuegos Esplendido. Cheap as chips but power packed in flavour.

20210626-193155.jpg
 

OzPiper

Lifer
Nov 30, 2020
6,751
36,400
72
Sydney, Australia
An Opus X robusto with some Black Tot rum and a mug of black chai.
Nice mellow cigar at @10 yo.
The Black Tot rum was released with great hype and a lot of hoop-lah to great acclaim from rum "experts" and over-the-top reviews. It was a triumph of marketing over substance
I should have realised that any rum served daily to thousands of Her Majesty's naval fleet was not going to be anything from the top shelf. I have to say that my mug of chai is the more satisfying drink today.
A very expensive history lesson !image.jpgimage.jpg
 

dcon

Lifer
Mar 16, 2019
2,713
22,980
Jacksonville, FL
Nat Sherman Metropolitan Selection

View attachment 86301
7 x 50
CT Shade/DR/DR

This was the last cigar of a 5 pack I received gratis from JR Cigar. The other Nat Shermans actually exceeded my expectations. Unfortunately, not this one. This was possibly the most nondescript cigar that I have ever smoked. If i were asked what it tastes like, I would say ‘nothing”. And I literally mean that. It did not burn hot. It was well constructed. It was not a mild cigar. It was not like sucking hot air. It was just, flavorless. There may have been the most remote of a ’tobacco’ taste but, it was hardly discerned. I am sure Nat Sherman cigars will not be missed by many. I, like @mso489, enjoyed my one pilgrimage to their NY store. I was never overly impressed with their private label cigar offerings. They had some quality cigarettes in their day but, many smokes of even higher quality could be found by other companies‘ products. I will say that, I am not a big fan of CT wrappers. Ashton was always the choice if I wanted to go in the ‘creamy’ direction.
 

saltedplug

Lifer
Aug 20, 2013
5,192
5,115
AGREED lol. I like the Churchill version, if only the No.4 came in a 6.5” - 7” version that would be right up my alley. I don’t mind a 50 gauge but personally prefer mid 40’s
Long and skinny was certainly my preference. Of course the lancero should have been a favorite, but I found no magic there despite buying deep some of the market's favorites.
Long, tiring week calls for a cigar vs a pipe. I believe this is from a re-release of some of the original release that La Aurora intentionally held back for aging purposes. I had read some review somewhere about how this re-release was flat and the cigars didn't appear to age well. I full-heartedly disagree; this particular cigar has legs for at least another 10 years. The flavors are rich, deep, and are wonderfully representative of the Dominican terroir. Having only received this one as an extra in a trade, I would gladly have bought a box or 2 of this re-release to age until the wheels fell off.
View attachment 85959
After reading your posts for some time it is my belief that you knows how to pick 'em. If I was still buying cigars I would follow your picks around like a dog:).
This 898 is at the top of my list. It is one smooth smoke, very creamy with a retrohale completely absent of pepper burn or harshness. It's like smoking a scone, I'm loving it.

I struggled finding this box, it's from '17 and haven't looked lately but this is the kind of cigar that would have me shopping. I've been super frugal with this box but it is certainly hitting that spot were it might be hard to stay out of them.
I went through the holding on vs. letting go dilemma many times over the course of smoking tobacco, especially in aging. I aged a lot of tobacco, for years. But guess what? 2/3s of it I never smoked. The aging mindset becomes a trap. If you continue to age to get those truly rarified and exquisite aged flavors, you're not smoking it. But wasn't your purpose in buying it to smoke it?

Another form of this is what it seems you are doing, holding on to increase future availability. But I ask you, does delayed gratification make the delayed taste any sweeter?

There's nothing wrong with either form of delay, but neither worked for me.
 

danimalia

Lifer
Sep 2, 2015
4,470
27,090
42
San Francisco Bay Area, USA
You have a lot of lung power! Smoked slowly though, you get more flavor, more relaxation
There is a fellow at my local shop infamous for finishing an LFD Double Ligero Digger (an 8.5" x 60 monstrosity, and a most potent blend) in like 37 minutes! An impressive feat that makes me queasy just contemplating. Another guy made a big deal for weeks leading up to New Year's Eve a few years ago that he was going to smoke a Digger, which was out of character for him. It must have taken him 5-6 hours to smoke his, and it was pretty obviously kicking his ass. I don't know how long it would take an average cigar smoker to get through a Digger (too much cigar for me!) but I'm guessing it's somewhere between 37 and 360 minutes :LOL:

Anyway, my usual take is do what makes you happy, but come on.... the only cigars you should be finishing in 37 minutes are small coronas like minutos, perlas, etc., or cigarillos and the like.
 
There is a fellow at my local shop infamous for finishing an LFD Double Ligero Digger (an 8.5" x 60 monstrosity, and a most potent blend) in like 37 minutes! An impressive feat that makes me queasy just contemplating. Another guy made a big deal for weeks leading up to New Year's Eve a few years ago that he was going to smoke a Digger, which was out of character for him. It must have taken him 5-6 hours to smoke his, and it was pretty obviously kicking his ass. I don't know how long it would take an average cigar smoker to get through a Digger (too much cigar for me!) but I'm guessing it's somewhere between 37 and 360 minutes :LOL:

Anyway, my usual take is do what makes you happy, but come on.... the only cigars you should be finishing in 37 minutes are small coronas like minutos, perlas, etc., or cigarillos and the like.
I smoke fast but cannot finish 8.5 x 60 in 37 minutes. That would be about 1 hr and 30 mins at least for me ?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.