Still an assertion, not a fact. I know a lot of people with well developed palates and they will disagree about aspects of what they have tasted. In this instance my question would be, based on the above quote, has anyone caught Per Jensen lying about his product. Because, that's what is being suggested here.
Indeed an assertion, I'll not deny that. I am making no disparaging remarks about someone I do not know, Per Jensen (well, I'm not trying to, lol), but I certainly am not naïve enough to think that anyone high up in a corporate structure has honesty and yours and my best interest in mind. They have THEIR best interest in mind, first and foremost, which is to keep their job and continue to get pay raises. That interest of theirs (the overall ultimate interest of maximum profit by the company), sometimes, can lead one to bend the truth. It is Human Nature.
Solani is still printing Syrian Latakia as a component of English Luxury Mixture, yet they no longer have any Syrian, it would seem? I would hardly hold other Tobacco Mfgs to a different standard than Solani, or any other random mfg.
Palates are indeed overrated, too, as taste is so subjective. I'll bet, though, there are palates out there that most definitely can tell the difference between Syrian and Cypriot. That ain't my palate, though, as mine is more in tune with Virginias, and Latakia tastes like Latakia to me. I'll bet those palates are fewer than people would want to admit (a Latakia enthusiast would prefer to think they can tell the difference). It is the palates that cannot tell the difference, which I would be willing to bet is the majority of pipe smokers, where the money is made in calling Cypriot Syrian. I am NOT saying that is what MacBarren is doing, merely I think it silly to not consider all of that when wondering, "Am I
really smoking Syrian Latakia here, as the label says?"
I understand your point, and am not really taking any issue with it. Perhaps my perspective comes from the 'once bitten, twice shy' camp as a general rule when evaluating such subjects as 'truthfulness from the mouths of Corporate Executives'.
The onus is upon them (guys like Per Jensen) to prove they are selling what they advertise, as there seems to be talk amongst some pipe smokers that they have been lied to recently, to some extent. Certainly with an issue like this (the end of a well, well liked and respected tobacco variety) and as nothing more than keeping their customer base informed for good customer service. There aren't that many places that pipe smokers congregate on the web. Any mfgs that don't spend 30 minutes a week scanning this forum is not utilizing all of their marketing channels, nor expressing much interest in what all ya'll think. We and our cellars are just spreadsheet numbers to them.
Companies do NOT start in a position of automatic trust with me. That's because money is involved. This is a serious issue in the pipe smoking world (the disappearance of tobacco types). Per has my automatic trust when I see he, or others (I know a couple blenders post here), actually address the issue when it crops up in places like this. It would take 2 minutes. As far as Per is concerned, an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure concerning his credibility. It's like the Dunhill stuff (last time I looked at posts here about it) - we find out about it here from a guy from Lane. Dunhill doesn't really care about you or I, and you and I don't mean that much more to Per, I suspect ...
Again, I am certainly not trying to argue with you or anyone about it. Just rambling on a forum.
And, I still wanna know how to get that job on a boat in Turkey ...