C’mon man, you know that stuff is like riding a scooter.......fun to ride but you damn sure don’t want your friends to see you on it?My short RY review: vomit, with a side of bile
C’mon man, you know that stuff is like riding a scooter.......fun to ride but you damn sure don’t want your friends to see you on it?My short RY review: vomit, with a side of bile
What? Yet, you like that stale potato chip flavor of Velvet? ?Could be! I know lots of people like it but the topping to me just takes like a vurp.
Nah man! Vespas all the way! Mods vs Rockers!C’mon man, you know that stuff is like riding a scooter.......fun to ride but you damn sure don’t want your friends to see you on it?
On a serious note, what IS the chicken taste? We can only preface with the word "like", as you did, and speak in metaphors. Taste is an experience and all experiences are individualistic. We have some agreed upon "paint brush" terms as I call them like sweet and sour, bitter, spicy (but what spice?), harsh, hot...etc. Hence, we sample, try, experiment and become more experienced. But, that experience is as individual as your fingerprint.actually egg tastes kind of like chicken but more immature.
You must have got some bad shitWhat? Yet, you like that stale potato chip flavor of Velvet? ?
I’m with you on that 100%. Plus it’s one of the few tobaccos that I can push and push and it never bites or gets harsh even in a hot pipe.My subjective experience is that the flavoring, plum or whatever it is, is decidedly subordinate, supporting the good Virginia leaf but not overreaching. It is, to me, tobacco forward, which is how I like my aromatics. Clearly, others don't taste it this way at all, but that's how taste works, I guess.
I'd consider it a Virginia with a topping. Personally, I don't think its more aggressively flavored than many VAs that don't advertise any added flavorings. Obviously, YMMV, and maybe I got a mellowed tin. I was expecting something very strongly flavored and for me, RY just tasted like a VaPer. I should revisit it, though, as it's been several years since I had any.So how would y'all categorize Royal Yacht?
Like, in which notebook section would I scribble my tasting notes, what area of the tobacco shelf would it sit on, what column in the tobacco database?
It's listed as an Aromatic on Tobacco Reviews, but would you place it more as a Virginia or Virginia-Based blend (that happens to have slight topping added)?
Semi-Aromatic?
"Other"?
I’m sure it was a fluke. I’ll order another tub or three to be absolutely sure. Maybe a dozen.You must have got some bad shit
pretty much hit the nail on the head.On a serious note, what IS the chicken taste? We can only preface with the word "like", as you did, and speak in metaphors. Taste is an experience and all experiences are individualistic. We have some agreed upon "paint brush" terms as I call them like sweet and sour, bitter, spicy (but what spice?), harsh, hot...etc. Hence, we sample, try, experiment and become more experienced. But, that experience is as individual as your fingerprint.
As a rule of thumb (and there are exceptions as there are a number of VA types, even depending on where grown - soil conditions, weather, etc. - its similar to wine) VA leaf, especially Bright is flue cured. The heat from the wood fired flues kills the leaf quickly setting the sugars and keeping starch from forming. This is unlike Burley which is air cured. Consequently, Burley is more absorbent then VA and can be heavily flavored. Because of the sugar in VA leaf, especially Bright, it must be processed into cakes, steamed, aged - fermented - to make it smokable otherwise it will burn your tongue and palette. If flavored its usually a light, alcohol based natural flavoring, like whisky or vanilla, etc. In the UK its against the law to adulterate tobacco with anything artificial, like glycol, nitrates or any chemicals (preservatives). Tobacco falls under the spice laws passed by Parliament in the 17th C. Remember, London was the spice processing capital of the world for centuries. More exploration was done by HM ships for spices then gold. When ships came into port unscrupulous importers could easily add anything to the spices or tobacco, especially hay or straw to add weight. This is why they gravitated to the vacuum tin; I don't know, but this too may have been a Dunhill innovation; they certainly were the first to vacuum tin cigarettes.I'd consider it a Virginia with a topping. Personally, I don't think its more aggressively flavored than many VAs that don't advertise any added flavorings. Obviously, YMMV, and maybe I got a mellowed tin. I was expecting something very strongly flavored and for me, RY just tasted like a VaPer. I should revisit it, though, as it's been several years since I had any.
Fascinating.As a rule of thumb (and there are exceptions as there are a number of VA types, even depending on where grown - soil conditions, weather, etc. - its similar to wine) VA leaf, especially Bright is flue cured. The heat from the wood fired flues kills the leaf quickly setting the sugars and keeping starch from forming. This is unlike Burley which is air cured. Consequently, Burley is more absorbent then VA and can be heavily flavored. Because of the sugar in VA leaf, especially Bright, it must be processed into cakes, steamed, aged - fermented - to make it smokable otherwise it will burn your tongue and palette. If flavored its usually a light, alcohol based natural flavoring, like whisky or vanilla, etc. In the UK its against the law to adulterate tobacco with anything artificial, like glycol, nitrates or any chemicals (preservatives). Tobacco falls under the spice laws passed by Parliament in the 17th C. Remember, London was the spice processing capital of the world for centuries. More exploration was done by HM ships for spices then gold. When ships came into port unscrupulous importers could easily add anything to the spices or tobacco, especially hay or straw to add weight. This is why they gravitated to the vacuum tin; I don't know, but this too may have been a Dunhill innovation; they certainly were the first to vacuum tin cigarettes.
But its also why American drug store varieties were/are mostly Burley based blends, heavily flavored and adulterated with glycol and preservatives to increase shelf life by keeping it moist.
Very similar. Before Peterson's reissue of the Dunhill blends, RY was only available from resellers for very inflated prices. When McConnell put out its line of Dunhill "clones", I was delighted to find Paddington hitting all the familiar notes that RY did. Since Peterson re-released RY, I've had them back to back and find them very close. Peterson's version, to me, has a bit more richness/depth in the underlying Virginias but it is interesting to see how much influence marketing/branding has. Load a bowl of each in a blind taste test and let that be your guide...Anyone know how the current Peterson RY compares with McConnell Paddington which is the K&K version? I have a couple of tins on the way to try but may not get to them for a while due to having so much open.
I really like this blend now. I couldn't stand it when I was smoking just aros. Ever since I started liking Sammy Gawith and Gawith Hoggarth blends I wanted to try it again. Now I'm digging it!I just take it as an aromatic blended with a masterful sense of simplicity. It is not jazzed up at all, and the secret sauce, plum I presume, is just right to enhance and highlight a good grade of Virginia leaf. Like a good piece of writing, it doesn't have any extratraneous parts.