[REFERENCE] Things I Found in My Tobacco

Log in

SmokingPipes.com Updates

3 Fresh Bill Shalosky Pipes
New Cigars
9 Fresh Dunhill Pipes
34 Fresh Rossi Pipes
36 Fresh Chacom Pipes

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

Status
Not open for further replies.

greeneyes

Lifer
Jun 5, 2018
2,274
12,635
Title edited for brevity. This is the complete orginal:

[REFERENCE] Things I Found in My Tobacco - Episode 1 - Acadian Gold (Perique Method)

[INTRODUCTION] Inspired by a recent inquiry into some white 'growths' in a tin of Robert McConnell Perique, I thought I would take a look around in my own cellar. I was sure I'd seen them before so I thought it would be worth a closer looks. A much, much closer look. I found them on various tobaccos I have in jars, but one place where they were very prevalent was inside a tin of a personal favorite---Russ Ouellette's Acadian Gold. Acadian Gold, a "love-hate" tobacco, is a "bright, sweet, yellow, Canadian-grown Virginia" that has undergone a Perique processing and the resulting leaf is rich and complex. My open tin of Acadian Gold has an astounding number of these white 'growths' in and on it, and it also appears on the paper cover that sits atop the tobacco.

[DISCLAIMER] Before I proceed I must offer a disclaimer insofar as the analysis that follows extends only to my own tobacco. I have not, unfortunately, been able to analyze the 'growths' in your tobacco and thus cannot be as certain about the identity of your gremlins as I am about my own. Onward...

The Acadian Gold (left) and closeup of the tobacco dandruff. What is that stuff?
tin1.jpgtin2.jpg

So I did what anyone would do. I took some samples into the lab for further analysis. Any good analysis must include both positive and negative controls. In this case, working under the assumption that what concerns most pipe smokers is the contamination of their tobacco by fungus, I would need a suitable example of a common household mold for purposes of comparison. On this occasion what I had on hand for a casual investigation were (left):

1. Some Esoterica Dorchester--uncontaminated (apparently)--as a negative control
2. Some Acadian Gold, with obvious crust of white stuff--the object of our investigation
3. White stuff picked out from among the ribbons of tobacco--a few stray flakes included
4. White stuff scraped off the paper insert
5. Household mold scraped off a bagel we forgot about in the cupboard--white and blue patches
6. A thin slice of bagel where apparently nothing was growing
7 & 8. Some tea leaves I also forgot about and that had plenty of mold

The samples were loaded into wells of a plastic plate that would be suitable for further treatment and investigation (right):

1693682210019.png1693682225597.png

Much of what there is to be learned about the identity of things in the laboratory can be gleaned from careful observation at high magnification for evaluation of structure and morphology. In this case an initial inspection by light microscopy at 4x and 20x magnificaiton would be suitable:

Comparison of samples #1 and #2 were consistent with dried plant material and cellulose matrix. The appearance of the samples (to borrow an expression from pathologists) was otherwise unremarkable (nothing "stood out" as being distinct or abnormal).
1693682686182.png1693682717543.png

The 'white stuff' was, unsurprisingly, considerably different than its vegetal substrate (#3a). At lower magnifications (4x) the sample had a rocky, gravel appearance. Upon closer inspection (20x) it was possible to discern fine crystalline needles. These had the appearance of being somewhat fragile which would explain why some of the larger aggregates appeared rocky and dull.

1693682963720.png

These crystals were insoluble in phosphate buffered saline at pH7.0 (#3b; RGB brighfield microscopy), however they readily dissolved in a sodium acetate pH4.75 solution (#3c) leaving behind only pieces of tobacco leaf, suggesting the possibility that they are an organic salt. More conclusive tests would certainly give a more conclusive answer in terms of the chemical composition of the crystals. I leave conjecture to others but I would be surprised if the crystals aren't in fact something that was itself sprayed or otherwise applied to the tobacco during its processing. Occam's razor...

1693683215824.png
What about the bagel? Don't forget the bagel! I didn't forget the bagel. A positive control is essential to any half-assed scientific endeavor. What types of things would we be looking for in the case of a fungal infection of tobacco? For starters we focus on fungal infections because the moisture content and the format (solid) of the tobacco was insufficient to support bacterial growth to any extent. The villain in most cases tends to be fungi that quickly colonize tobacco within an acceptable range of moisture conditions, spreading their filamentous tendrils (hyphae) throughout, secreting enzymes to essentially digest their substrate (our bagels, our tobaccos) and reabsorb their meals.

The bagel (#5) is a perfect example of fungal contamination, having very promiment filamentous hyphae and spores (conidia). The slice of bagel that wasn't contaminated (#6) actually only wasn't visibly contaminated. I did ultimately find a few hyphae in the sample. What most of us see on moldy bread is usually the spores at the surface. In this case, the hyphae underneath had already spread.

1693684092558.png

And the teas (#7 & 8)---the stereotypical morphology of Aspergillus sp. is very prominent. The conidiophore and conidia chains--delicate structures.

1693684307366.png

In order to investigate the samples a little further, I decided to probe them using two molecular probes that stain DNA (a dye called Hoeschst 33342), and a fluorescently-linked phalloidin (a fungal toxin that binds filamentous actin). These two stains would give a higher-magnification readout of any DNA and actin (cytoskeleton, a cell's "structure") that might be present in the samples.

As shown (below) all of the fungally-contaminated samples had prominent staining for both hyphae and conidia. I was happy that the images were similar to those reported elsewhere [LINK] by researchers using the same probes.

1693685063811.png

The "shake" containing the crystals and tobacco pieces had no such fungal structures. There were "clumps" of DNA and actin staining but because these were not organized into structures, they were likely from the tobacco itself. In fact, although I didn't save the photo, it turns out that wheat flour is FULL of DNA. The photo wasn't very interesting---a glowing blue bagel slice.

1693685483011.png

In summary, the white gremlins growing on my perique-processed Acadian Gold are likely organic crystals and not fungal spores. And while it's not possible for everyone to undertake this type of analysis at home, an easy test would be to collect the crystals and see if they dissolve in simple household vinegar. If they dissolve they are very unlikely to be fungal in origin.

@hamid
 

Attachments

  • 1693684065555.png
    1693684065555.png
    580.8 KB · Views: 14
Last edited by a moderator:

bluegrassbrian

Your Mom's Favorite Pipe Smoker
Aug 27, 2016
6,675
64,557
41
Louisville
Always loved the Acadian Gold. When it was released I talked to Russ about the "organic" appearance. There was a lot of worry about mold at the time - in no small part thanks to C&D.
He said that all of the Acadian Gold looked that way and it wasn't mold - just a byproduct of the perique process on the high sugar content bright Virginia - although the byproduct itself isn't a "sugar".
 

greeneyes

Lifer
Jun 5, 2018
2,274
12,635
Someone posted on this forum recently (in the last month?) a link to a paper about plume or bloom that we recognize as good. It concluded that the plume (some of us, myself included previously thought were sugars) were in fact salts. Interesting paper!
That was the fellows analyzing the things growing on cigars, if I recall correctly. I think that with pipe tobacco 90% of inquiries could be addressed with a good magnifying glass, or even some of the inexpensive low-power microscopes that are available nowadays.
 
Feb 12, 2022
3,591
50,697
32
North Georgia mountains.
Very interesting. Thanks for posting. I have a couple unopened tins and hope to snag a few more from a body who's got some. He gifted me an opened tin that was indeed moldy and sadly I had to toss it. But I love the stuff.
I've also always thought a magnification to settle many dispute in the world of tobacco. Again, very cool post.
 

hamid

Lurker
Aug 31, 2023
10
9
@greeneyes
Hello and greetings. I'm really impressed with the care and attention you put into this, the time you spent, and the thorough testing you did. And I'm very happy that the result was good news and it cleared my and others' worries. Thank you. Your kindness is appreciated. Again, I apologize for my poor English
 
  • Like
Reactions: greeneyes

greeneyes

Lifer
Jun 5, 2018
2,274
12,635
@greeneyes
Hello and greetings. I'm really impressed with the care and attention you put into this, the time you spent, and the thorough testing you did. And I'm very happy that the result was good news and it cleared my and others' worries. Thank you. Your kindness is appreciated. Again, I apologize for my poor English
I am but a humble servant to others for the skills that God has bestowed upon me. 😌 I seem to recollect that Kolhase & Kopp have a strong presence in your country based on things I've gleaned Instagram at least, so---tin age notwithstanding---any contaminated McConnell that should happen to appear should not be too difficult to replace.

Be well, my friend 🤝
 

hamid

Lurker
Aug 31, 2023
10
9
I am but a humble servant to others for the skills that God has bestowed upon me. 😌 I seem to recollect that Kolhase & Kopp have a strong presence in your country based on things I've gleaned Instagram at least, so---tin age notwithstanding---any contaminated McConnell that should happen to appear should not be too difficult to replace.

Be well, my friend 🤝
I am grateful for your kindness and love and I am happy that God has created good people like you. Yes, this company's products are well found in my country and a large shipment has just arrived, but unfortunately the problem was with pure perique cans. Other friends who bought from this consignment had the same problem, and with your help and guidance, our concern has now been resolved. Thank you and I hope you enjoy life, my good and kind friend.
 
  • Like
Reactions: greeneyes

jttnk

Lifer
Dec 22, 2017
1,683
10,489
Phoenix, AZ
THANK YOU! I just opened some Bob’s Chocolate Flake that’s been in a jar for at least 2 years. It’s got crystals all over it. It looks like salt, shimmers under the light. Unless I misunderstood, this is neither good nor bad, just not harmful like smoking mold. If I’m wrong, please let me know! :oops:
 

UB 40

Lifer
Jul 7, 2022
1,349
9,800
62
Cologne/ Germany
nahbesprechung.net
[INTRODUCTION] Inspired by a recent inquiry into some white 'growths' in a tin of Robert McConnell Perique, I thought I would take a look around in my own cellar. I was sure I'd seen them before so I thought it would be worth a closer looks. A much, much closer look. I found them on various tobaccos I have in jars, but one place where they were very prevalent was inside a tin of a personal favorite---Russ Ouellette's Acadian Gold. Acadian Gold, a "love-hate" tobacco, is a "bright, sweet, yellow, Canadian-grown Virginia" that has undergone a Perique processing and the resulting leaf is rich and complex. My open tin of Acadian Gold has an astounding number of these white 'growths' in and on it, and it also appears on the paper cover that sits atop the tobacco.

[DISCLAIMER] Before I proceed I must offer a disclaimer insofar as the analysis that follows extends only to my own tobacco. I have not, unfortunately, been able to analyze the 'growths' in your tobacco and thus cannot be as certain about the identity of your gremlins as I am about my own. Onward...

The Acadian Gold (left) and closeup of the tobacco dandruff. What is that stuff?
View attachment 244196View attachment 244197

So I did what anyone would do. I took some samples into the lab for further analysis. Any good analysis must include both positive and negative controls. In this case, working under the assumption that what concerns most pipe smokers is the contamination of their tobacco by fungus, I would need a suitable example of a common household mold for purposes of comparison. On this occasion what I had on hand for a casual investigation were (left):

1. Some Esoterica Dorchester--uncontaminated (apparently)--as a negative control
2. Some Acadian Gold, with obvious crust of white stuff--the object of our investigation
3. White stuff picked out from among the ribbons of tobacco--a few stray flakes included
4. White stuff scraped off the paper insert
5. Household mold scraped off a bagel we forgot about in the cupboard--white and blue patches
6. A thin slice of bagel where apparently nothing was growing
7 & 8. Some tea leaves I also forgot about and that had plenty of mold

The samples were loaded into wells of a plastic plate that would be suitable for further treatment and investigation (right):

View attachment 244198View attachment 244199

Much of what there is to be learned about the identity of things in the laboratory can be gleaned from careful observation at high magnification for evaluation of structure and morphology. In this case an initial inspection by light microscopy at 4x and 20x magnificaiton would be suitable:

Comparison of samples #1 and #2 were consistent with dried plant material and cellulose matrix. The appearance of the samples (to borrow an expression from pathologists) was otherwise unremarkable (nothing "stood out" as being distinct or abnormal).
View attachment 244201View attachment 244202

The 'white stuff' was, unsurprisingly, considerably different than its vegetal substrate (#3a). At lower magnifications (4x) the sample had a rocky, gravel appearance. Upon closer inspection (20x) it was possible to discern fine crystalline needles. These had the appearance of being somewhat fragile which would explain why some of the larger aggregates appeared rocky and dull.

View attachment 244204

These crystals were insoluble in phosphate buffered saline at pH7.0 (#3b; RGB brighfield microscopy), however they readily dissolved in a sodium acetate pH4.75 solution (#3c) leaving behind only pieces of tobacco leaf, suggesting the possibility that they are an organic salt. More conclusive tests would certainly give a more conclusive answer in terms of the chemical composition of the crystals. I leave conjecture to others but I would be surprised if the crystals aren't in fact something that was itself sprayed or otherwise applied to the tobacco during its processing. Occam's razor...

View attachment 244206
What about the bagel? Don't forget the bagel! I didn't forget the bagel. A positive control is essential to any half-assed scientific endeavor. What types of things would we be looking for in the case of a fungal infection of tobacco? For starters we focus on fungal infections because the moisture content and the format (solid) of the tobacco was insufficient to support bacterial growth to any extent. The villain in most cases tends to be fungi that quickly colonize tobacco within an acceptable range of moisture conditions, spreading their filamentous tendrils (hyphae) throughout, secreting enzymes to essentially digest their substrate (our bagels, our tobaccos) and reabsorb their meals.

The bagel (#5) is a perfect example of fungal contamination, having very promiment filamentous hyphae and spores (conidia). The slice of bagel that wasn't contaminated (#6) actually only wasn't visibly contaminated. I did ultimately find a few hyphae in the sample. What most of us see on moldy bread is usually the spores at the surface. In this case, the hyphae underneath had already spread.

View attachment 244209

And the teas (#7 & 8)---the stereotypical morphology of Aspergillus sp. is very prominent. The conidiophore and conidia chains--delicate structures.

View attachment 244211

In order to investigate the samples a little further, I decided to probe them using two molecular probes that stain DNA (a dye called Hoeschst 33342), and a fluorescently-linked phalloidin (a fungal toxin that binds filamentous actin). These two stains would give a higher-magnification readout of any DNA and actin (cytoskeleton, a cell's "structure") that might be present in the samples.

As shown (below) all of the fungally-contaminated samples had prominent staining for both hyphae and conidia. I was happy that the images were similar to those reported elsewhere [LINK] by researchers using the same probes.

View attachment 244214

The "shake" containing the crystals and tobacco pieces had no such fungal structures. There were "clumps" of DNA and actin staining but because these were not organized into structures, they were likely from the tobacco itself. In fact, although I didn't save the photo, it turns out that wheat flour is FULL of DNA. The photo wasn't very interesting---a glowing blue bagel slice.

View attachment 244219

In summary, the white gremlins growing on my perique-processed Acadian Gold are likely organic crystals and not fungal spores. And while it's not possible for everyone to undertake this type of analysis at home, an easy test would be to collect the crystals and see if they dissolve in simple household vinegar. If they dissolve they are very unlikely to be fungal in origin.

@hamid

Great investigation, especially the hint how to decide, weather there is some soluble salt or organic mould via vinegar test. Thanks a lot.
 
  • Love
  • Like
Reactions: greeneyes and hamid

woodsroad

Lifer
Oct 10, 2013
12,915
21,622
SE PA USA
[INTRODUCTION] Inspired by a recent inquiry into some white 'growths' in a tin of Robert McConnell Perique, I thought I would take a look around in my own cellar. I was sure I'd seen them before so I thought it would be worth a closer looks. A much, much closer look. I found them on various tobaccos I have in jars, but one place where they were very prevalent was inside a tin of a personal favorite---Russ Ouellette's Acadian Gold. Acadian Gold, a "love-hate" tobacco, is a "bright, sweet, yellow, Canadian-grown Virginia" that has undergone a Perique processing and the resulting leaf is rich and complex. My open tin of Acadian Gold has an astounding number of these white 'growths' in and on it, and it also appears on the paper cover that sits atop the tobacco.

[DISCLAIMER] Before I proceed I must offer a disclaimer insofar as the analysis that follows extends only to my own tobacco. I have not, unfortunately, been able to analyze the 'growths' in your tobacco and thus cannot be as certain about the identity of your gremlins as I am about my own. Onward...

The Acadian Gold (left) and closeup of the tobacco dandruff. What is that stuff?
View attachment 244196View attachment 244197

So I did what anyone would do. I took some samples into the lab for further analysis. Any good analysis must include both positive and negative controls. In this case, working under the assumption that what concerns most pipe smokers is the contamination of their tobacco by fungus, I would need a suitable example of a common household mold for purposes of comparison. On this occasion what I had on hand for a casual investigation were (left):

1. Some Esoterica Dorchester--uncontaminated (apparently)--as a negative control
2. Some Acadian Gold, with obvious crust of white stuff--the object of our investigation
3. White stuff picked out from among the ribbons of tobacco--a few stray flakes included
4. White stuff scraped off the paper insert
5. Household mold scraped off a bagel we forgot about in the cupboard--white and blue patches
6. A thin slice of bagel where apparently nothing was growing
7 & 8. Some tea leaves I also forgot about and that had plenty of mold

The samples were loaded into wells of a plastic plate that would be suitable for further treatment and investigation (right):

View attachment 244198View attachment 244199

Much of what there is to be learned about the identity of things in the laboratory can be gleaned from careful observation at high magnification for evaluation of structure and morphology. In this case an initial inspection by light microscopy at 4x and 20x magnificaiton would be suitable:

Comparison of samples #1 and #2 were consistent with dried plant material and cellulose matrix. The appearance of the samples (to borrow an expression from pathologists) was otherwise unremarkable (nothing "stood out" as being distinct or abnormal).
View attachment 244201View attachment 244202

The 'white stuff' was, unsurprisingly, considerably different than its vegetal substrate (#3a). At lower magnifications (4x) the sample had a rocky, gravel appearance. Upon closer inspection (20x) it was possible to discern fine crystalline needles. These had the appearance of being somewhat fragile which would explain why some of the larger aggregates appeared rocky and dull.

View attachment 244204

These crystals were insoluble in phosphate buffered saline at pH7.0 (#3b; RGB brighfield microscopy), however they readily dissolved in a sodium acetate pH4.75 solution (#3c) leaving behind only pieces of tobacco leaf, suggesting the possibility that they are an organic salt. More conclusive tests would certainly give a more conclusive answer in terms of the chemical composition of the crystals. I leave conjecture to others but I would be surprised if the crystals aren't in fact something that was itself sprayed or otherwise applied to the tobacco during its processing. Occam's razor...

View attachment 244206
What about the bagel? Don't forget the bagel! I didn't forget the bagel. A positive control is essential to any half-assed scientific endeavor. What types of things would we be looking for in the case of a fungal infection of tobacco? For starters we focus on fungal infections because the moisture content and the format (solid) of the tobacco was insufficient to support bacterial growth to any extent. The villain in most cases tends to be fungi that quickly colonize tobacco within an acceptable range of moisture conditions, spreading their filamentous tendrils (hyphae) throughout, secreting enzymes to essentially digest their substrate (our bagels, our tobaccos) and reabsorb their meals.

The bagel (#5) is a perfect example of fungal contamination, having very promiment filamentous hyphae and spores (conidia). The slice of bagel that wasn't contaminated (#6) actually only wasn't visibly contaminated. I did ultimately find a few hyphae in the sample. What most of us see on moldy bread is usually the spores at the surface. In this case, the hyphae underneath had already spread.

View attachment 244209

And the teas (#7 & 8)---the stereotypical morphology of Aspergillus sp. is very prominent. The conidiophore and conidia chains--delicate structures.

View attachment 244211

In order to investigate the samples a little further, I decided to probe them using two molecular probes that stain DNA (a dye called Hoeschst 33342), and a fluorescently-linked phalloidin (a fungal toxin that binds filamentous actin). These two stains would give a higher-magnification readout of any DNA and actin (cytoskeleton, a cell's "structure") that might be present in the samples.

As shown (below) all of the fungally-contaminated samples had prominent staining for both hyphae and conidia. I was happy that the images were similar to those reported elsewhere [LINK] by researchers using the same probes.

View attachment 244214

The "shake" containing the crystals and tobacco pieces had no such fungal structures. There were "clumps" of DNA and actin staining but because these were not organized into structures, they were likely from the tobacco itself. In fact, although I didn't save the photo, it turns out that wheat flour is FULL of DNA. The photo wasn't very interesting---a glowing blue bagel slice.

View attachment 244219

In summary, the white gremlins growing on my perique-processed Acadian Gold are likely organic crystals and not fungal spores. And while it's not possible for everyone to undertake this type of analysis at home, an easy test would be to collect the crystals and see if they dissolve in simple household vinegar. If they dissolve they are very unlikely to be fungal in origin.

@hamid
Spectacular.
I look forward to your future exploration of bloom, plume, flume and 'shrooms.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: greeneyes

greeneyes

Lifer
Jun 5, 2018
2,274
12,635
THANK YOU! I just opened some Bob’s Chocolate Flake that’s been in a jar for at least 2 years. It’s got crystals all over it. It looks like salt, shimmers under the light. Unless I misunderstood, this is neither good nor bad, just not harmful like smoking mold. If I’m wrong, please let me know! :oops:
I certainly couldn't decide whether crystals are good or bad on your behalf---I personally tend to associate it with well-aged tobacco so I consider it a "plus". Sounds to me like you're in for a treat!
 
  • Like
Reactions: hamid
Status
Not open for further replies.