We have a huge problem here with roving gangs of tweed wearing Dunhill puffing street roughs harassing local shop keepers, wielding Czech tools like switchblades, and leaving mylar Esoterica wrappers everywhere.
If we plant them between the ganja, no one notices.
You read the article, and it’s not really about “tobacco products” at all; it’s about vaping. I’d like someone to explain how vaping has anything to do with “tobacco products.” (That’s rhetorical, BTW. I actually have zero interest in any discussion about vaping.)
Nothing lunatic about the "antis". They should be respected and feared for their well organized and funded tactics. They are certainly better organized, as a bloc, than they tobacco industry and their customers are. Even tobacco vendors fear them. Understanding them and their tactics will certainly be more productive than name calling. Never underestimate the "antis." They are much better at what they do than their opposition.
The article focuses on vaping but the actual legislation encompasses all tobacco products as well. Vaping gets included as a "tobacco delivery system".
Unsurprisingly, the legislation specifically cuts out an exception for cannabis even as a flavor. So you can't buy cherry flavored vapes or tobacco, but you can buy cannabis flavored vapes and tobacco. I guess we'll be limited to smoking Sutliff Chronic and C&D Acapulco Gold in our pipes.
On the plus side, this would effectively eliminate any discussions of the merits of rub out vs. fold & stuff...
We have known for years to stock up. The writing has been on the wall for some time.
It would become grind out vs.stuff a bud.On the plus side, this would effectively eliminate any discussions of the merits of rub out vs. fold & stuff...
