I stowed back enough 109 to last me, but I didn't the 44, thinking that I had time, and it was pretty far down on my list of lifetime smokes. I was still buying fresh to let my others age, when Astleys switched to square tins for 109. This was sometime in 2015. This is when I noticed the licorice and the new recipe for 109. But, when Dan (Woodsroad) posted the list of casings used by British companies (I believed released in a lawsuit), Astleys showed that they indeed had been using licorice sweeteners. But, it wasn't as prevalent as it is in these newer versions.
The newer 44, tastes almost like an aromatic to me, similar to Blackpool in flavor. You may just have the better versions stowed back, and IMO the better versions. But yeh, taste buds are different. This is why I try to avoid reading reviews of tobaccos before I try something myself. I find that if I read a review before I try a blend, that I tend to "look" for the flavors that I have read about, instead of relying on my own senses. Eh, actually, I don't place much stock in reviews even after I have tried a blend, ha ha. It's more fun to just rely on my own findings. Not to disparage reviewers. Some folks really like conferring on them. I just march to my own drummer. ::
The newer 44, tastes almost like an aromatic to me, similar to Blackpool in flavor. You may just have the better versions stowed back, and IMO the better versions. But yeh, taste buds are different. This is why I try to avoid reading reviews of tobaccos before I try something myself. I find that if I read a review before I try a blend, that I tend to "look" for the flavors that I have read about, instead of relying on my own senses. Eh, actually, I don't place much stock in reviews even after I have tried a blend, ha ha. It's more fun to just rely on my own findings. Not to disparage reviewers. Some folks really like conferring on them. I just march to my own drummer. ::