The bridge supports were designed to do just that- support the bridge. They weren't necessarily designed for lateral loads, but more for downward pressure loads.An article on prevention of bridge collapses.
How a $3m structural 'flaw' led to catastrophic collapse of Baltimore bridge - Times of India
The operators of the Dali cargo ship issued a mayday call that the vessel had lost power moments before the crash, but the ship still headed toward the span at “a very, very rapid speed," Maryland governor Wes Moore said. The 985-foot-long (300-meter-long) vessel struck one of the 1.6-mile...timesofindia.indiatimes.com
When they put it back they’ll protect it from a similar cargo ship strike.
One question I’d like answered.
The Key bridge was a steel truss bridge with reinforced concrete supports.
Those supports had a lot of weight pressing down on them and were sunk quite a ways deep.
How did a 100,000 ton ship move a concrete support, enough to bring down the bridge?
Normally the support wins any contest between a ship and a bridge, I’d think.
The sheer mass of the moving ship created an enormous amount of kinetic energy and would push a relatively small concrete structure out of it's way..........