Longchamp is a small, family owned French company. dunhill (lower case dee)is a brand owned by "Richemont Group", a large, also family owned, Swiss conglomerate. I doubt Longchamp is even a blip on Richemont's radar. Piaget, Mont Blanc, Purdy, Cartier and many other brands are under the Richemont umbrella of ownership. I believe Richemont is, by far, the largest of the luxury brand holding companies.That sure sounds like longchamp, are you sure?
Label changes for Christmas Cheer made them susceptible for FDA scrutiny. Would this not be the same?They'd be shortsighted to make them out to be anything other than a re-labeling of the very same blend they've been producing for Dunhill. Both for customer acceptance and to avoid FDA "testing" and the large fees for that.
Short answer, yes. Longer answer, since the Dunhill branded blends left the US market around July of 2008 and were gone for a considerable time while Orlik and STC arranged for a new US distributor, they were never eligible to be grandfathered in. Nothing has actually changed in that regard.With the newly modified legislation are these going to be categorized as new blends and be victim to the May 11th deadline?
Indeed. May 11th next year will let us see if any sanity is left.Anyway, we'll find out in a few years I guess!
Peterson didn't pick them up. STG owns the Peterson name for tobaccos and assigned the resumption of production of the former "Dunhill" blends as part of its Peterson offerings.Ah, so their possible demise was coming even prior to Peterson picking them up.