I too am a layman in this area and not a particularly well informed one, having taken my last class on this subject in the early 90s. Nonetheless, my understanding regarding rules of origin is that there is another layer of law above a particular country's and that layer consists of international treaties and trade agreements. Goods need to be properly marked with their place of origin to obtain whatever favorable tariff treatment had been negotiated under particular treaties and agreements and those treaties and agreements govern when a good is deemed to have originated from a particular country. The US Commerce Department should have on-line advice available, and as they're based on international law, should be sound for British made goods as well. I used to know what the general principals were and whether a shirt whose pieces are cut in the US but sewed in Mexico qualifies as Made in the USA, but I don't remember anymore.Here’s an informed layman’s (meaning non-lawyer) discussion of the subject: see Origin Marking | Legal & Practical Issues in the UK - https://www.urbancottageindustries.com/blog/country-of-origin-marking-law/, and the further material linked within the post.
My takeaway is that marking origin is not compulsory; law regarding the right to mark “Made in England” is not entirely clear; and anyone deciding to do so runs the risk of substantial damages under aggressive enforcement provisions. Facing that fact pattern if it was my business I would not mark country of origin unless I had a compelling reason to do so and a very strong argument under the partly superseded guidance embedded in the language of the 1968 Act: “goods shall be deemed to have been manufactured or produced in the country in which they last underwent a treatment or process resulting in a substantial change”. In my view that requirement would not be met by jamming a stem into a stummel and putting the result in a box. Risks acceptable to sketchy fly-by-night operators are generally not taken by large businesses. I would bet money that Dunhill’s pipes undergo steps in England that give it a strong defense against enforcement liability.
So, maybe some stummels are made elsewhere? And, this shocks people in the distribution chain, or maybe jealousy, or just that "wink wink, I know something" rumor mill?There is a world of difference between 'some manufacturing processes or bits are supplied in or outsourced' and buying completed pipes from OEM manufacturers.
My theory some sales men are full of it. Probably one that can't carry Dunhills anymore. They're not the problem it's Dunhill so you just can't get them sorry oh and they're made in Italy so don't go asking around and get a new distributor. You know like the rumors about other English pipe tobacco makers that where going round before they got a new and better distributor.If it were just guys setting around smoking coming up with these tales it would be one thing, but I wonder why these get started by distributers and pipe shop owners?
Thank you,There's no briar growing in London. None. So yeah, some part of the pipe comes from somewhere else. Is it wood only? Is it a half finished bowl? Doesn't hardly matter. The fitment of the stems, the drilling, etc, hasn't changed in 100 years. Same with the stems - made from rod ebonite, and that comes from Germany, Dunhill doesn't make it. They cut it into stems.
Does Dunhill make pipes? Yes. Where? Walthamstow. Are they locally sourced organic gluten free pipes? No.
I understand your meaning, but if they are no longer Dunhill's pipes (technically ) who's are they then ?Technically, there aren't any new Dunhill pipes anymore, as they have been rebranded as White Spots like in the post above.
Dunhill finished with pipes years ago.
Same factory, same people, but different branding. Alfred Dunhill’s White Spot. Just a name, technically still the same history. Just another page. IMOI understand your meaning, but if they are no longer Dunhill's pipes (technically ) who's are they then ?
Given all the confusion 1995 onward .
Ok. And who owns the brand ? If you catch my drift.Same factory, same people, but different branding. Alfred Dunhill’s White Spot. Just a name, technically still the same history. Just another page. IMO
I often wonder how many pipes AD carved himself ?Dunhill hasn't been Dunhill ever since Alfred stopped carving when the old wrists couldn't take it anymore. Richard was a ne'er-do-well skirt chaser who couldn't carve a lump of coal. It's been downhill ever since the old boy died in 1924. At least he escaped the sight off Nazi bombs destroying the old shop. It's all Swiss precision now. Lovely on the surface but soulless inside.
I saw that earlier today when I googled it also, but I’m not sure how that works into the discussion. If GM bought Porsche, they’d still be Porsche cars.Google :
Who makes Dunhill pipes now ?
a London-based luxury goods company owned by Swiss company Richemont and the Dunhill tobacco products company owned by British American Tobacco (now two independently owned entities).