Interesting thread. Don’t think I have the experience to say based on pipe smoking, but it is wood. And I think the root burls serve as a water reserve. So, it does move liquids. Curing, this, that… it has to retain some of its original properties. So, I think you’re probably right on the end grain absorbing more, but is it really significant enough to affect smoking properties of a pipe? I don’t know. The best part- everyone is technically correct on this thread!
I got curious, and yes replying to my own post ?
. The other two popular pipe materials are meerschaum and cobs. As the three top pipe materials they all have a very strong common bond. They are all porous and natural materials. To think they don’t absorb and that their make-up isn’t influenced by their properties is most likely incorrect. Additionally, being natural materials there is probably little uniformity across the volume of samples unless it’s multiple pipes from the same burl possibly. It’s most likely materials that have some absorption were chosen on purpose because they do offer the best smoking. Don’t see anyone using glass pipes for pipe tobacco… why not?
This is a loaded question. Too many variables to really answer. But, this bugged me based on some responses. It cannot be a simple yes or no it doesn’t help. Fetching higher prices based on aesthetics while marketing the best quality smoke can’t lose for high prices - so, it’s most likely a little bit of everything. Who in the pipe world who can afford the most attractive pipe said to smoke the best isn’t going to get one? No different than many other products.
Jesus, what have my Friday nights been reduced to…?. Frankly, I’m never going to spend that much on a pipe to find out. I’m happy with mid to low range priced pipes that deliver a quality smoke for me. I will pick up a turd or two - but, rather pick up a $50-$150 turd than. $500-$1000+ turd. If I don’t spend high dollar I don’t have to know what they’re like, can’t be missing out, and can live vicariously through those who do. Easy enough. ?