Uh, what’s your point. Compare the two contestants. Two doesn’t show up in the Rorschach tests you posted.
I’ll gladly post actual Cutty’s after the contest is over and not line drawings from mud pits.
Uh, what’s your point. Compare the two contestants. Two doesn’t show up in the Rorschach tests you posted.
Be sure to include the Cutty spigots!I’ll gladly post actual Cutty’s after the contest is over
Except the discussion isn’t about spigots, but shapes. Neither pipe qualifies as a historically accurate Cutty if shank is the limiter.Be sure to include the Cutty spigots!
My point was that a tulip-like curve was not uncommon on older clays, especially the Dutch produced ones.Uh, what’s your point. Compare the two contestants. Two doesn’t show up in the Rorschach tests you posted.
I’ll gladly post actual Cutty’s after the contest is over and not line drawings from mud pits.
Acknowledging the problem is the first step.I'm a sucker for a spigot
True but that silver is hard to overlook when considering the starker transition visuals from stem to bowl. A cutty to me is a simpler visual shape. So... you're almost right.Except the discussion isn’t about spigots, but shapes. Neither pipe qualifies as a historically accurate Cutty if shank is the limiter.
I'm just minding my own business, going for a walk in the woods. Seriously though, #2.
As far as the shank prep a spigot is historically accurate. I’ll post pictures of my spigots after the contest is over.True but that silver is hard to overlook when considering the starker transition visuals from stem to bowl. A cutty to me is a simpler visual shape. So... you're almost right.