Me too.
I could bore you to death with C02 facts, but I won't.There are other studies out there. Such as: USA has the cleanest emissions in the world; the CO2 levels are at the lowest levels in the last 40,000 years (estimated); if we drop another 2.34% all life on earth will die out starting with plants; there has been a 40% increase in trees and foliage in the past few decades. The truth is out there but discerning it is the problem. Nature tends to heal itself as George Carlin implied![]()
![]()
d, if the ice caps melted instantly, sea levels would rise 4 inches. Not the hundreds off feet the "experts" say.Pollution has always been the issue. Toxins have always been the issue. A body running on "green" ingredients will always out perform one riddled with arsenic, mercury, and other metals as well as the slew of petro chemicals and other chemicals we have sluicing through our bodies. The air we breathe, the water we drink, and the food we consume should be our priorities. But what would be the fun in that - we are a people without shame.
Not as of last week.and it’s possible to put a lot of windmills
Not as of last week.
Motorcycle. 'nuff said.
Cars have been going downhill in terms of driver enjoyment since 2000, and moronically increasing in cost since ~2020. It's completely impossible to buy a new car under $15,000 in Europe at the moment, they basically don't exist. In India it's possible to buy a local adaptation of a small Suzuki for $5,000. It's basic but it's sturdy, works, and is cheap enough for more or less anyone to afford it.
I know I'll be forced to get an automatic EV eventually, but I don't care as long as I can ride.
Well run coal plants aren't the issue at all. C02 from burning coal is so exaggerated its almost a hoax.We humans are selfish bastards.
We love old Number One in the mirror, we surely do.
My favorite example is the modern leaf blower. A machine expressly designed to blow your leaves on somebody else’s property.
If our cars burn gasoline, or if they use electricity generated by a coal plant, we don’t see the pollution.
My wife and I happened on a huge coal plant down by the bootheel in a place so poor and destitute there were still sharecroppers shacks right out of Song of the South still standing. No doubt it had to be largest (maybe only) employer for miles around.
That is the beauty of electric cars.
They will all travel three or four times further on the same amount of energy and it’s possible to put a lot of windmills in the same poverty stricken places there used to be coal plants.
Forget about people giving a rat’s ass about generations yet unborn.
Electrics make a cleaner present.
Well run coal plants aren't the issue at all. C02 from burning coal is so exaggerated its almost a hoax.
Our atmosphere is a C02 processing machine. The planet has been dealing with quartillions of tons of C02 for billions of years.
Just ONE of thousands of major volcanic events produced many times the C02 than the C02 produced in all of human history. And there have been thousands of those volcanic events.
Its pretty arrogant to believe our little coal factories and automobiles have even close to the same impact as when the continents were formed by volcanoes that turned night into day, thousands of times over billions of years. That entire time, life flourished.
C02 is not dangerous to humans until it reaches 5000pmm. If our industry and coal use was like it was in the 1970, it would take literally billions of years to become dangerous. And then, its not even that bad to humans.
The zealots just say CARBON because people associate carbon with carbon MONOXIDE. C02 is carbon DIOXIDE, much, much, much less dangerous than carbon monoxide. I cannot tell you how many people believe C02 is what kills people in their homes when the furnace is on the fritz.
Again, our planet is a C02 filtering machine. In a million years we couldn't overpower that with coal fumes.
Does C02 from petroleum affect our planet in any negative way? Maybe, but science doesn't show that in any peer reviewed, unbiased studies.
Our planet has volcanoes.
The planet has learned to deal with Co2 levels FAR above anything we could produce.
All the coal plants in the US aren't as bad for our planet as just a couple pharmaceutical companies in India.
From overgrowth of deadly bacteria, to people and animals becoming tolerant to antibiotics, uncontrolled pharmaceutical plants are a cancer on this planet.
Ive never once heard a politician say a word about these manufacturers. Because the politicians get paid by these same companies.
During the Obama era they changed the narrative from global warming, to climate change. Why?
The dumbest words uttered by a human are, "we need to stop climate change". Even slowing climate change would cause catastrophic death.
The facts are out there. It has been so ingrained in people, its hard to explain it.
A good place to start is Randall Carlson. He is NOT a climate scientist. His work with ice cores and....other stuff is undeniable.....mostly.
Many of his theories have not been proven, but many have. He was a pioneer in the Younger Dryas theory which main stream science now agrees with. His work on the great flood theories, and the effects of C02 are eye opening.

I believe I've told this here before, but maybe not.Short version
This earth is 4.5 billion years old. It was all water.
2,000 years ago the Romans built docks still in use today.
My wife is an environmentalist.
She insists on driving the largest three ton SUV sold.
Because we can afford one.
I refuse to believe humans can permanently alter a 4.5 billion year old ecosphere if we tried using nuclear weapons. The earth is vast and we are very small.
But of course we can and we do, shat in our own nest. We do pollute our habitat.
Nobody is actually for, burning coal or oil or even wood. We do that because it has been the cheapest fuels.
If cold fusion comes, all of us are saved. We’ll be like the Romans who did not meter the aqueducts. Every home will use all the juice they want like we use the internet all we want.
Until then, Elon Musk has sold seven million electrics and he’s the richest man who’s ever lived because of it. As much as he blows through billions he may die as broke as Tesla but next year he’ll sell almost two million electrics to delighted, famously loyal customers.
AI Overview
View attachment 410343
View attachment 410345
View attachment 410344
+1
View attachment 410346
Tesla has sold over 7.2 million vehicles since its inception, according to Investing.com. In 2024, they delivered 1,789,226 vehicles globally. Their best-selling model is the Model Y, followed by the Model 3.
—-
Elon has a problem, because the makers of the Model T have woke up.
There’s a buttload of money to be made selling electrics to people who hate electrics and do not care a rat’s ass about ecology.
I mean, I’ve dreamed about my own 427 Cobra for sixty years and I’ll never have one.
But my next Ford might run like one.![]()
I got that out of my system as a kid by driving a 1973 Chrysler Vista Cruiser with a 455 @ 128mph late at night on the highway ... the doors started to shake at 128 so I backed it down to 60. From then on I preferred big cars (rolling couches) that were comfortable and wished Castro Convertible made cars. To each his own. You could get a kit car of the Cobra as well but they are a bit pricey now too.I’ve dreamed about my own 427 Cobra for sixty years and I’ll never have one.
I do not want to make any political statements in violation of the rules but I believe something happened last week such that no new windmills will be built in the USA in the near future if ever. Review the news.Let’s say you and me were on the board of an electric company.
A new nuclear plant is out of the question. We’d fight do gooders and still not have it 20 years and 20 billion dollars later.
How about a new coal plant? Do we have a death wish? No way. New coal is dead. We’ll keep ours until the gubbermint regulates it be shut down and we’ll pay 4 cents or more for fuel per kilowatt hour and it’s dirty and expensive to maintain and they are in shithole places out in the boondocks.
And they take a long time to get up steam to start, too.
A viable choice is a new Natgas turbine plant at 4 cents a kilowatt, no big boilers, we can put one anywhere. We hire one guy to turn a valve, no coal trains, no coal shuttles, and the same 4 plus cents fuel cost, much lower maintenance, thirty minute startup.
Why we see all those big trucks hauling wind turbine blades is wind has zero fuel cost.
The actual amortized cost is 2 cents or less a kilowatt hour, true.
But in the desolate and godforsaken places the wind blows almost all the time the farmers will kiss us if we offer them leases.
The wind doesn’t always blow, but it blows quite a bit where they put wind turbines, and when it blows the utilities shut down that many Natgas plants.
When my wife and I drove out across the Mississippi River bottoms to marvel at the big coal plant it must have been shut down. There was no steam from the cooling tower, no smoke from the furnace tower.
But the wind blew huge clouds of coal dust off the coal piles out and down the river for miles.
I do not want to make any political statements in violation of the rules but I believe something happened last week such that no new windmills will be built in the USA in the near future if ever. Review the news.
Van, you are an encyclopedia of terrible music.
