-
Kevin Godbee - Oct 5, 2010
- 7 min read
By G. L. Pease
I’ve always wondered a little about guys who claim to know everything they need to about a tobacco blend from only a single bowl, or, in some cases, even less. What do they know that the rest of us don’t? When I worked in a tobacconist’s, I marveled at the occasional customer who would walk in, fill his pipe (singular) with blend after blend from the jars at the tasting bar, strike a match, offer a few powerfully puffed clouds to the breeze, bang the still smoldering mass into the ash tray, and go on to the next jar. This is a skill I did not possess then, and, apparently, still have not acquired. In fact, from my perspective, and this is likely to raise a few hackles, it’s simply not possible to know much at all about a tobacco blend without giving it a much more thorough shakeout than can be found in a few puffs or a single bowl.
While my initial perception of a blend may be slightly more informed these days than it was thirty years ago, it’s still uncertain, unreliable, not to be trusted. There are too many variables at play, and it’s those variables that make the instant assessment impossible. There is one thing we might be able to sus out from a single smoke-we like it, or we don’t-but, even this can be somewhat off the mark as often as it’s on.
What most of us are seeking is a pleasant, enjoyable smoking experience, and it’s certainly not necessary to scrutinize every bowl in order to have that. Most of the time, nothing can be more satisfying than a gentle, relaxing smoke with our pipe there to enhance the experience, not distract us from it. These are those special moments of peaceful bliss when the pipe and tobacco we smoke engage us in a way that soothes rather than challenges. But, there are those times when we may choose to smoke more critically. Whether we’re hoping to extract every nuance from our first bowl of a beautifully aged classic blend, or are trying to decide whether we want to cellar a boxcar full of something new that we want to enjoy through the rest of the century, we need to put those first impressions in their place, and get ourselves into a more reliable mindset.
The pipe itself offers the first obstacle to really "getting" a blend. Since the briar will carry with it the lingering memory of the last several bowls it’s been intimate with, we can’t expect it to paint a pure and accurate picture of the tobacco we’re smoking in it this time. Even if the blends are of the same basic genre, the subtleties can be occluded by the ghost of tobaccos past. And, if the pipe has catted about, finding its fill of whatever blend its owner thought intriguing in a moment’s fancy, things can be even more challenging. (That said, some of the most fascinating and enjoyable smoking memories for me have come from these sorts of "crossover" smokes, but that’s another story.) In any case, only after quite a few bowls of a new blend have been smoked in a pipe will the clouds part to reveal a clearer view of things.
A new pipe presents different, but similar problems. As I write this, in fact, I’m smoking a tobacco I’m very familiar with in a pipe of more recent acquaintance. The taste of the tobacco itself is hiding behind the pleasant, but boisterous voice of the virgin briar. I love these early smokes in a new pipe, but, they don’t tell the story of the tobacco itself very well. If I were to judge the tobacco from this experience alone, it might not fare as well as it has over the recent months during which it’s become one of my faves.
Then, there are those cases of pipe and tobacco disharmony, when a particular leaf and a particular briar refuse to get along. I’m sure most of us have had an experience where a favorite pipe and a favorite blend clashed like the Sharks and the Jets. Switch the tobacco, or the pipe, and the neighborhood is peaceful again. This phenomenon seems to be more pronounced with more natural styles of tobaccos, especially virginias and latakia blends, and less so with heavily flavored ones. I’ve tried to figure this one out for thirty years, without success, so I’ll just wave my hands, attribute it to magic, and move on.
Beyond the pipe, environmental conditions can dramatically affect the way a blend tastes. Temperature, relative humidity, the moisture content of the leaf, how long the pipe has rested and so on, all make a contribution to the overall experience of a tobacco. When I was in Denmark, I found myself really enjoying a blend that I absolutely cannot stand in California. The difference was so remarkable that I asked the manufacturer if the U.S. product was different from the one sold in Denmark. No, it’s not. Being skeptical, I brought back two tins anyway, just in case. Sure enough, when I returned home, the very same tobacco that I’d been enjoying for weeks, was rendered un-smokable for me in the very same pipes.
Tastes also can change with the seasons. Blends that I crave and adore on cold, dark winter’s nights are too heavy for me to enjoy at all in the humid heat of a summer’s day. In casual polls, this turns out to be a common phenomenon, though far from a universal one. Many pipesters choose what they smoke based on climate, while just as many enjoy the same blends year-round.
Finally, our experience can be influenced by things like mood, other blends we’ve been smoking, what we’ve been eating, what we’ve been drinking, the vitamins we’ve been taking, or changes to medications. Or, perhaps we’ve changed our filling technique, or are drying or rubbing-out our tobaccos out more than we did before, or smoking more slowly or more quickly. Or, the new blend might be in a style that is different from what we’re used to, and we need to let our palate acclimate to the new tastes. There are so many variables to be taken into consideration that it’s beginning to look as though our first impressions may not be of much use at all.
A friend in Italy once jokingly told me that his critical evaluation of any new tobacco is simple: "Mi piace; non mi piace." I like it; I don’t like it. This might be the only situation in which first impressions have real value, but even here, can those quick assessments be trusted?
It’s easy to be impressed by something at first blush. A bold, intense flavor, a dramatic aroma, maybe a little more strength than we’re used to can form a positive first impression, but will it have staying power? I’ve been bitten by this one; based on a single tasting of something "boldly original," I bought quite a few tins for the cellar, only to find, by the time I’d finished the first, that my pipes and palate had become fatigued by the flavors, and the strength turned out to be too much for this confirmed nico-wimp. Tins traded; lesson learned. Until next time.
The opposite can also happen; blends that become favorites are often those that didn’t overly impress initially. These more subtle or complex blends often reveal their true beauty only to the patient. As we get to know them, exploring and experiencing them in different pipes, under different conditions, we may find buried treasure lying beneath a less exciting surface. In those cases, the time we’ve spent in the careful uncovering is well rewarded, and if we hadn’t gotten past the prejudice of the first impression, we might have ended up missing out on something truly wonderful.
Fickle they may be, but if kept in check and appreciated for what they are, our first impressions can offer something of real value. They can guide us towards deeper enjoyment, or away from things that might be objectionable. We just have to remain aware of the fact that they are, in fact, only estimations; given too much weight, they can lead us to abandon something that might have become an all-time favorite had it been given another chance, or seduce us to stock up on something we might end up not liking much at all. First impressions do offer clues, and we should listen critically to what they have to tell us, but be careful not to fall into the trap of relying on them too much.
Since 1999, Gregory L. Pease has been the principal alchemist behind the blends of G.L. Pease Artisanal Tobaccos. He’s been a passionate pipeman since his university days, having cut his pipe teeth at the now extinct Drucquer & Sons Tobacconist in Berkeley, California. Greg is also author of The Briar & Leaf Chronicles, a photographer, recovering computer scientist, sometimes chef, and creator of The Epicure’s Asylum. |
Written by Kevin Godbee
More Pipes and Tobaccos Articles
29 Responses
Recent Posts
Welcome to The Pipes Magazine Radio Show Episode 641. Our featured interview tonight is with Jeremy Reeves. Jeremy is the Head Blender at Cornell & Diehl and is featured in our recurring series, “Ask the Tobacco Blender”. However, tonight he will be the interviewee as we learn about how he became a pipe smoker and collector, when he got his first pipe and how he progressed from there. At the top of the show, Brian will have a review of the rare German tobacco blend, Tumblin’ Dice.
I remember the first time I heard someone else say it. “How many pipes do I need? Just one more.” It’s glib, sure, a bit of a joke, but it also rings a bell of truth, at least to me. I certainly have “enough” pipes, but pipes are seductive little things. Just when we think we’re all set, we have enough, another will come along that tempts us beyond any sense of reason. I suppose it’s the same way with any sort of collecting. There’s always another white whale we’re in pursuit of. When we finally track that one down, though, another will almost inevitably breach the surface, taking its place as the new object of our desire, enticing us to change course and set sail once again. But, there’s a potential problem with having a lot of pipes. Maybe. The more pipes we may have, the harder it can be to keep them in rotation. It makes sense. We tend to gravitate towards our current faves, the ones that most appeal to us for whatever reason, and sometimes, maybe they stay in rotation longer than they really should. The side-effect of this, of course, is that another favored pipe might end up too-long forgotten. That’s exactly what happened recently. Exhibit A: The Castello pictured is one that has been long overlooked. It’s a Trademark shape #55. It’s a really nice example of the shape. The red pearlized stem is beautifully done. The wood isn’t really anything special to look at, but it’s evenly covered, without any bald spots. When I look at it, I wonder why it wasn’t done in the more typical dark ruby-red finish that adorns most Trademarks. I’ve seen a great deal of variation amongst the grade over the years, including one really nice bent-bulldog that left the factory with a brown sandblasted finish. (For those who don’t know, Trademark has long been the lowest Castello smooth grade, usually finished in a dark red.) Was this a stamping/grading error, or is there just more leeway in the grade than we’ve come to expect? I might never know. This example is from the early 1970s, maybe even the late 1960s, identified by the upper case Ks in the grade designation. (On Sea Rock and Old Antiquari pipes, the Ks reflect the size, while with the smooth finishes, Trademark, Castello and Collection, the Ks represent the relative grade.) It has been living in a different rack than the one housing the majority of my #55s. I don’t recall why I put it there, but as many of us can relate to, rack space is often at a premium. I stumbled upon it while looking for something completely different. “Oh, you? Why are you there? I remember you smoke pretty well.” Yeah, I sometimes talk to my pipes – one of many quirks, I suppose. I won’t begin to worry until they start talking back. I grabbed it from the rack, dusted it off, and decided to give it a fill with a bowl of a slightly aged VA/perique blend, Telegraph Hill, from 2018. What a delightful smoke! At five years, the tobacco is expressing a lot of the complexities of aged Virginias and the perique adds a delightful fruitiness. When young, the composition is a bit brighter, maybe a little spicier, but time has polished any edges, and amplified the sweeter notes. Like the pipe, I’d forgotten about this blend for quite a while, but one evening in March, after chatting with my good friend Nate, who is quite a fan of it, I decided it might be time to revisit it. I got a couple of fresh ones, and excavated a couple older tins from the library. I normally reach for Fillmore when I want a VA/perique thing because of its boldness and depth, but in revisiting this one, I’m finding something soothing and comfortable about it that I’ve really been enjoying, both young and aged. Sticking with the theme of the forgotten, and as a perhaps interesting tidbit to the photographically inclined, I shot the pictures for this month’s column with my old Nikkor-O 35mm/2.0 mounted on my trusty Nikon Df. The last time I used this lens, it was adapted to one of my Fujifilm bodies, and I didn’t care much for the results, so I put it away and pretty much forgot about it. But, I’ve recently been exploring some of my old kit, deciding what to keep, what to pass along, and this one once again came to my attention, kind of like that old Castello. On the Df, there’s something about its vintage rendering that I find truly appealing. Another forgotten treasure, and just like with that old pipe, it seems that, at least today, everything old is new again. If your collection is on the large side, are there pipes or tobaccos that you’ve all but forgotten, only to come back to them one day to find yourself wondering why? Maybe it’s just another fun dimension to this endlessly fascinating journey.
Welcome to The Pipes Magazine Radio Show Episode 640. Our featured interview on tonight’s show is with Ben Rapaport. Ben has been known internationally as an avid pipe smoker, antique pipe collector, and book author. His first book on pipes was published in 1972, and his latest book – his 10th – is out now in very limited quantities. The distribution has already sold out, but you can still get a copy of “The Wide World of Wood Tobacco Pipes. Two Centuries of Craftsmanship and Creativity” by contacting him directly at ben70gray@gmail.com. At the top of the show we’ll be turning the tables on our recurring Ask the Pipemaker segment. This time, Jeff Gracik will ask the questions, which Brian will answer as a pipe collector, and you can give your answers too.
Welcome to The Pipes Magazine Radio Show Episode 639. Our featured interview on tonight’s show is with Per Billhäll. Per is the owner of Scandinavian Pipes, which is an online retailer of high grade pipes. He started smoking pipes in the 1960s. His first high grade pipe was made by Hans “Former” Nielsen, who is one of the living legends from Denmark. That led to Per becoming a huge pipe and tobacco collector, and show attendee where he became well known. Along with pipe book author Jan Andersson, they started The Pipe Club of Sweden in 1991. Then in 1999, Per started “Scan Pipes”. He is now one of the pipe retailing legends from Sweden. At the top of the show Brian will talk about holiday blends, and other special pipe tobacco blends.
Welcome to The Pipes Magazine Radio Show Episode 638. Our featured interview on tonight’s show is with Fae “The Sassy Pipe Lady” Simmons. Fae is the owner of Tobacco Treasures, which sells new, vintage, & estate pipes, and smoking accessories on Etsy. She has been in business since 2017, and has been surrounded by pipes and tobacco most of her life. Her father and his brother smoked pipes, and so does Fae. Her husband is also a retired tobacconist that worked all over the industry from coast to coast for several different companies in the industry. She has a great story of how her business got started with a great inventory of unsmoked vintage pipes. At the top of the show we will have an Ask the Tobacco Blender segment with Jeremy Reeves. Jeremy is the Head Blender at Cornell & Diehl, which is one of the most popular boutique pipe tobacco companies in the USA.
Ok, so it’s that time of year, as we all know. Family feasts, houses, yards, and big trees festooned with lights and dangling ornaments, just high enough to keep the cats from reaching a paw into the greenery. It’s also the time of year when your pipe-smoking-significant other makes vast hints about a new pipe. That’s to be expected since he or she was a good boy or girl during the year. Yes, ladies smoke pipes, too. Oh, you want an example? Okay, try Actress Greta Garbo, Millicent Fenwick, Mary Frith, and my late grandmother (who died when she was 93) dipped snuff and smoked a cob occasionally. So now that we have settled that the gentler side of life will puff a pipe too, let’s move on to the upcoming biggest holiday of all. Of course, that huge event is brought to us by the hefty fellow in a red suit, puffing his pipe all the way in a sled filled with presents, being led by a reindeer with a red nose. Or some such. That’s Santa Claus, of course. Becoming a bit more serious, Christmas is such a wonderful time for families and friends. It’s also quite special for pipe puffers. For many of us, this brings up a nostalgic look back to our pipe-smoking or cigar-smoking friends who have died during the current year. A great journalist pal whom I often joined in a local brick-and-mortar pipe and cigar shop. I puffed my pipe, and occasional cigar, as he enjoyed a cigar. He died in October and will be missed. On the happier side of things, Christmas is also a time when mind workers of the world renew their collections with fresh additions. Pundit included. A French passion has overtaken Pundit, from reading more Albert Camus, a heavy cigarette smoker, as were many French intellectuals of a certain time. Instead of cigarettes many of us prefer the more relaxed enjoyment of pipes for that “calm and objective judgment” in the comings and goings of the world. This brings me to French pipes. While visiting France once in the long ago, I happened by a “Tabac” shop in Paris, Tabac Des Vosges. I purchased a beauty of a Chacom bent. I also later bought a Ropp made from ancient briar. To learn more about the dawn of briar pipes and beginnings, take a peek at a well-done piece by Davin Hylton in Pipe Line on April 12, 2023, on Saint-Claude, France, the birthplace of briar. Also in the long back when, on a cold Christmas afternoon, Pundit wandered into an Atlanta bricks and mortar pipe shop to look around. There, resting in an enclosed glass counter was an exquisite Comoy. An older gent, smoking a beautiful bent, asked me if I wanted to look at that pipe. It had a $100 price tag. A college student working for a grocery store chain to help with college tuition at the time, Pundit didn’t have one hundred cents, let alone a C note! I declined and found a $5 basket pipe. A Christmas tradition had just begun. Since that early time, Pundit has made it a holiday ritual to either reward himself, or a special friend, with pipe or tobacco. A Claudio Cavicchi would be nice. Just sayin.’ And now for a couple of December-born Pipe Smokers of the Past: Joseph Rudyard Kipling was born on Dec. 30, 1865, and died on Jan. 18, 1936. I always prefer to believe the best of everybody; it saves so much trouble—Rudyard Kipling. Martin Van Buren, born Dec. 5, 1782, and died July 24, 1862, U.S. President, 1837-1841 As to the presidency, the two happiest days of my life were those of my entrance upon the office and my surrender of it—Martin Van Buren. And one more note to recall a deceased World War II veteran who loved William Somerset Maugham, the author. Maugham, a pipe smoker, was born in Paris, France, on Jan. 25, 1874, and died on Dec. 16, 1965. One cool afternoon as the veteran and I talked while sitting in his backyard patio, he looked off into the distance as if studying something. Nothing in particular. Just looking. He turned to me and said if I wanted to learn about life, “read Somerset Maugham.” I did. It wasn’t until late in life that I discovered how easy it is to say, ‘I don’t know’ –W. Somerset Maugham And now a Parting Shot: Any day with an old friend with pipes and tobacco is a good day.
I know I’ve had several times where I disliked a tobacco at first, but tried it 1 or 2 times more and then it became one of my favorite blends.
I have also had the occasion to love something the first time I smoked it, and then completely fallen out of love with it later.
Great comments on the effect of climate and environment. I had a tobacco last night that I almost dismissed. I had been smoking it outside or in the basement, and thought it was acrid and tasteless. I smoked it in my office last night and was blown away by the subtleties that I had missed!
Greg thank you for expressing yet again that common sense, patience, and civility will offer the nutrients our understanding of the complexities of various tobaccos and blends require to grow. And only after actually having gotten to know a blend or type of tobacco (just like a person), should we render any opinion- and even then those opinions should be questioned!!!
I thoroughly enjoy your articles and look forward to seeing more of them!
Kind regards,
Ian Minton
Great article Greg.
I love to go to the local B&M and stuff and puff from a jar that I haven’t tried before. Sometimes I like it right away sometimes not. But, I don’t decide based on that one bowl smoked over old jokes and reminiscence. If I’m looking for something new I’ll buy a couple of ounces and give it a fair shake. But, I have noted the same phenomenon you so accurately described.
A lot of thoughts in one article – may need to re-visit for further comments (not unlike a baccy really!).
First question though is on the nature of soothing v. contemplative/critical smokes – can they be from the same blend? For me, some are like old easy going friends (or old jeans) and need little thought but the best are those blends that just don’t respond to being rushed or smoked without thought. (I won’t embarrass our editor by referring to those complex blends by name).
What do others find – same or separate?
Interesting points, Jim. I think there are some tobaccos that can fill both niches equally, offering both comfort and complexity, depending on how much attention we can put on the blend at the moment, but these may be few. I’ll look forward to reading what others think about this aspect of our enjoyment.
-glp
I loved the pictures that accompanied the article.
Very well worded it flowed, and was informative of different factors on tobacco.
Kudos go to Kevin for the photos.
-glp
Well done Mr. Pease. A very thoughtful and well defined artical. It make’s me reconsider my approach when going after a new product of choice. Many thank’s: thezman
Another great article Greg. Always thought provoking. The pics provided by Kevin are great as well.
Thanks for the wonderful article Greg. I always appreciate being reminded of all the little things that can effect our pastime.
As to Jim’s question. I have noticed that I tend to have a cycle with blends I enjoy. I start out with those slow contemplative/critical smokes trying to find everything that makes it tick. As I become more familiar with the blend it becomes more of a relaxing smoke that occasionally surprise with something new and wonderful. After it has become a standby for a while it tends to fall out of favor and I begin smoking contemplatively/critically again trying to find what I once loved and it starts all over again. At least for the blends I really enjoy.
There are a few blends that seem to only fit in one category but most of the blends I enjoy cycle between the two types of smoking. Thus keeping me continually engaged and curious as to the next surprise.
Great article it has made me go back and try some tobacco I dismissed in a purchase I made.
You say that a blend you smoked in Denmark did not work for you back in California but have you ever found the opposite to be true? Do any of your own blends work less well for you in Europe than at home?
A good question, Scarborian. I’m sure this would be true with ANY blend, though some might be less environmentally sensitive than others. I chose this particular example because the change in my experience of it was really dramatic. On one hand, a smooth, sweet, easy smoking blend, and on the other, a mouth full of fire-breathing dragons. The point here is that climate and environmental conditions can influence what we experience, sometimes in profound ways.
-glp
In that fourth picture what’s that inside the bowl of the pipe, a price sticker?! Anyhow great article. It puts in words many of the thoughts I have when trying to give a new tobacco a shot.
I agree that at least a couple ounces smoked in various places at various times in a variety of pipes is the ticket. I have found by accident that I DO like a particular tobacco but only at a certain time. For instance, a straight VA, even one whose characteristics are generally known as HOt, Hot, HOT! A quiet slow atmosphere and a contemplative cadence will bring out the sweet, haylike, natural flavor of a straight VA for me. And, it’s so rewarding that I am more than willing to sit on a VA and wait to savor the joy!
There was a price sticker in there Tony, but I have now removed it. I will have a talk with our staff photographer and photo editor for sleeping on the job on that one. It’s hard to get good help.
Wow. The number of factors involved in each and every particular ‘moment’….writing them all down would be a wow. A task of impossible measure. You touched upon a good amount and there are so many more.
People like you Greg are tuned into so many more of those factors and your pipe senses are now adjusted to such a high extreme, it allows you to dissect such a subject to such a level. Other people perhaps not as tuned as you still have similar experiences but the reasons why they taste something or smell something have fewer answers than with you. Where some have clouds of confusion, others have a clearer sky. You choose to try and understand areas that many people just chalk up to mystery. For that we thank you because it gives the rest of us access to being able to get to that point.
Learning that the way we process any ‘happening right now’ moment, will always be based on what we have been able to experience up until ‘that moment’. The collective past experience makes up the perception of the now. Obviously if we are trying something for the first time our analytical process has very little to use, judge and gauge with. This is so with everything in life, not just pipes & tobacco. Yet somehow our ego, peer pressure or an assortment of other social and non-social factors tend to control that ‘right now’ moment to the point where we feel like we do not need that experience this time and we are suddenly somehow able to process and analyze something as if we have been doing it our whole lives. Funny human nature. Your article on tobacco provides an additional good guidance for experiencing life in general.
Very good article. I agree that one bowl isn’t enough to decide if a blend it good or bad or at least not to ones personal taste. I think sometimes maybe a diet for that day or other vague things can make a bland taste different from one day to the next.
Thanks for an informative and well written article.
Wait a minute!!! (Hasn’t your article taught me/us anything? Didn’t “the lesson” sink in? How fickle AM I?)
No. I’m gonna reserve judgment on your article until after I’ve read it a few more times… 🙂
Very good article, Greg. I have also found that my first impression of some tobaccos has been less than accurate after smoking them over time. I also know that some tobaccos seem quite different when smoked outdoors versus indoors so the climate issue is certainly a factor.
Thanks for the good read.
I am a novice, but I would like to expand on the idea of location affecting the smoking experience, especially in Europe vs America.
I am just thinking out loud here, but I would assume that the “location” itself wouldn’t matter except in a sense of the environmental characteristics of that area.
In other words, I imagine that things like humidity, temperature, elevation, etc. would be the factors that effect the smoke. I.E. air pressure and oxygen levels at higher altitudes effecting the speed and temperature of the burn.
If that is the case, then a bowl would smoke considerably different at the base of a hike than it would at the summit a couple hours later and perhaps only a couple of miles away.
I can definitely see how location would change the experience, but isn’t likely then that the European tobacco might smoke well in many other locations in between your home and Denmark. In other words, based on the information in your article which I hadn’t previously considered, it would seem that a specific tobacco would give you a vastly different experience in San Diego than it would in Yosemite Park or the northern coast.
I may have overcomplicated or oversimplified things, but I really enjoyed the article. It just occurred to me after reading that I don’t believe the tobacco is simply worthless in California. If it were me, I would be carrying it around with me to find a place locally (or more so than Denmark) where I could enjoy it.
Thanks.
This is a very interesting concept for me.
I live in Italy, one of the reasons being that food here just simply tastes better than anywhere else I’ve lived (the US, Canada, Germany,UK,Egypt).
At first I thought it was the quality of the raw materials used in cooking, but last month I tried a little experiment.
I made a carbonara with eggs from my hens and pancetta (dry-cured smoked bacon) from my pigs and 30-month matured Parmigiano.
Here at home it tasted spectacular as usual. I then traveled to England and took all the same ingredients with me, including the same water from my well to boil the pasta in.
The dish tasted respectable, but nothing more. It no longer had the depth and complexity of flavour- and I made it twice, a week apart, to make sure it wasn’t just because I’d been traveling and therefore might have been tired, effecting my palate.
I was involved in the brewing trade for 25 years, and had to conduct flavour profiling on beers, several times a week- thus I have an educated, well trained palate.
I’ve come to the conclusion it must be something to do with Italian air.
By the way, my pipe tobacco tastes much better here too!
I know that at least from my experience that the time of year does make a difference in taste.
Greg makes a good point. Initially, one of his co-authored blends, Two Friends Heritage, tasted too light for me. My first impression was a negative one. But, I was patient, knowing that this blend was the all-time favorite of Craig Tarker of C&D. So, I very patiently tried it again and again. Much to my surprise, I discovered the secrets this blend held. And, now, for a few years already, it is a daily staple, ever enduring, and I can’t be without it. So, while first impressions have value, as with anything else, value is truly found through the test of time.
Thank you all for a very informative article and so very many good points brought up .As a fairly new pipe smoker this helps wonderfully and gives me maybe a little more patience with my current blends .
Oddly, I do not like most of Mr. Pease’s blends when they are just released. The few that I have enjoyed right away, I end up not liking once they get some age on them. However, the blends I did not like initially, I really enjoy once they do have some age on them, go figure (then I kick myself for not stocking up).