I read the article, but am more interested in the comments picked by readers and NYT.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/01/business/international/us-chamber-works-globally-to-fight-antismoking-measures.html
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2015/06/29/us/us-chamber-commerce-cigarette-lobbying.html
Of course, I don't care too much about the freedom of trading tobacco for cigarettes, what I care is how it may affect pipe tobacco. And I would also argue that allowing the freedom of choice to enjoy tobacco should be similar to the freedom to enjoy other things such as alcohol, which is different from an attempt to induce a population to higher chance of addiction of certain use of substance.
Sadly, it seems that the comments are almostly one-sided against any tobacco use.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/01/business/international/us-chamber-works-globally-to-fight-antismoking-measures.html
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2015/06/29/us/us-chamber-commerce-cigarette-lobbying.html
Of course, I don't care too much about the freedom of trading tobacco for cigarettes, what I care is how it may affect pipe tobacco. And I would also argue that allowing the freedom of choice to enjoy tobacco should be similar to the freedom to enjoy other things such as alcohol, which is different from an attempt to induce a population to higher chance of addiction of certain use of substance.
Sadly, it seems that the comments are almostly one-sided against any tobacco use.