Why Do Aromatics Have a Bad Rap?

Log in

SmokingPipes.com Updates

Watch for Updates Twice a Week

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

obc83

Starting to Get Obsessed
Sep 4, 2023
244
1,147
I started on aros, didn't really know there was much else besides Captain Black. Until I got online about it. I read about the the beginner tongue bite thing and suddenly realized that pipes didn't have to suck. Was just desperate to get off the cigs, so I didn't care. But what is GP?

edit: I still love Captain Black. Just learned to smoke it a bit better.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Tate
While, I do smoke the occasional aromatic here and there, I am very picky about which ones. I just prefer the taste of tobacco, and I am even picky about cased "pure tobaccos".
There is not a damned thing wrong with being a snob. People root for football teams and put rivals down all the time. Please, please... call me a snob. I love it. If it bothers you... then good. puffy

That said, most of my comments regarding aromatics are just jokes. Mostly because aromatic smokers tend to be uneasy about it, lacking some confidence in their choices, which adds to the fun of poking at the genre. It's absolutely ok to like and smoke whatever blends you want.
 
Last edited:
Snob GIFs - Get the best GIF on GIPHY
 

ADKPiper

Part of the Furniture Now
Dec 13, 2020
588
1,438
Adirondack Mountains
They’re the most purchased pipe tobaccos on the market if I’m not mistaken so lots of people like em. We’re just too snooty on this forum I guess haha. I reckon most pipe smokers aren’t on this forum, don’t smoke 50 million blends, and don’t have 50+ pipes like many on here.

For what it’s worth I prefer the fancy schmancy blends myself and almost exclusively smoke c&d blends. They’re easier on my palate and have more nicotine than the aromatics I’ve tried. It’s been a long time since I smoked an aro though and I 100% packed it too tight. I found 1Q and BCA to be a bit too saccharine for me.
For me it's not a matter of snootiness. I just don't like them at all.
I find them akin to smoking cheap perfume.
That and from what I've seen they have added propylene glycol which seems to give me a headache.
More than anything I like good quality tobacco blended and processed in a way that brings out the natural flavors and complexities. Slathering it with strong flavorings is not something I find appealing.
There are exceptions. I'm sure that Uhle's blends have a semi strong topping but I still like them.
 

Infantry23

Part of the Furniture Now
Nov 8, 2020
768
2,034
44
Smithsburg, Maryland
Personally, I am very particular when it comes to smoking aromatics. I've had far too many that tasted like they were made in the storage room of the Christmas tree air freshener factory. Chemical, harsh, etc.
I agree with this 100%. I think some aromatics are really sublimely amazing, but some are chemically and not good. Perhaps some of that has to do with the pipe or smoking cadence. If that's the case then I guess it's subjective. But given time to enjoy a good, quality aromatic, I think they're really enjoyable.
 

Sobrbiker

Lifer
Jan 7, 2023
3,968
51,750
Casa Grande, AZ
I’m with @username on this one, in that I’d hate for a gift to be relegated to the shelf. I guess re-gifting would be possible though.

I like a few Aro’s, but even the ones I like I only smoke occasionally.
As a relatively new guy, I have found more of what I don’t like by genre (aros, Lat bombs), and am working on finding more blends in the genres I do like (VAs, VaPers, dark fired, etc).
I was one of the “no aro” guys, but didn’t know how to say “I have found I really like tobacco-forward high nicotine blends of quality leaf that may or may not be flavored/scented/cased/topped such as G&H, Gawith, and Dan”.

When I hear “aro”, I think high cav, PG pouches with candy store/bakery flavoring.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tate

Mike N

Can't Leave
Aug 3, 2023
492
2,736
Northern Panhandle of West Virginia
Compiling my list for Secret Santa, almost every participant this year has written 'no aromatics' as their preference. This is a random group of about 50 guys. Why the almost universal dislike?

Now as I consider it, I'm not sure I've ever had an aro, or what would be considered one.

So I guess my question is dual: what is an aro, and why are they so disliked?
Two words: tongue bite.

That aside, I’m unashamedly an aromatics guy, particularly East India Trading’s Officers Club and Tombigbee (formerly known as Old Toby at the Squire.)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Greatlaker and Tate
I have yet to meet an all day aromatic smoker. Usually, what I have seen from hanging out at the Briary (which is only a small sample of the population) is that aromatic smokers tend to mostly be new smokers or smokers that only smoke occasionally. Of course, if we include codger blends in as aromatics, there are probably more of these that smoke their codger aros all day long.

That said, as far as forum participation, very few die hard all aromatic smokers (unless we include codger blend smokers) actually participate for long or very much. Besides the handful of aromatics they smoke, they don't tend to participate in tobacco threads. Maybe the occasional, "what can I replace Apricot Delight with?" or "what is the best vanilla?"
This doesn't mean that they don't participate at all, but just that very few stick around, unless they also collect pipes, or have an interest in pipes. Not so much the tobacco end.

But, really it is mostly the tobacco purists who overwhelmingly are attracted to here. And, we are still a very low percentage of pipe smokers. I realize this. However, the majority of pipe smokers in the US are guys who buy their one aromatic blend, and maybe smoke a bowl a week or so while watching TV or reading.

This doesn't mean that they aren't welcome here, and of course we value their participation (well, I can only speak for myself on this). Codger aromatic smokers are a little different. We value them for their rough edges, orneriness, and quick cutting put downs. puffy
 

shanez

Lifer
Jul 10, 2018
5,458
26,143
50
Las Vegas
Aromatics and semi-aromatics probably make up the lion's share of what I smoke especially if you include blends with latakia.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tate

shanez

Lifer
Jul 10, 2018
5,458
26,143
50
Las Vegas
Topped aromatics with latakia in the blend, or are you just saying that latakia is an aromatic leaf?
Latakia is an aromatic leaf. If latakia is not counted then aromatics still probably make up the majority of what I smoke but at a lesser percent with VaPers coming in a close second.
 

Lumbridge

(Pazuzu93)
Feb 16, 2020
763
2,752
Cascadia, U.S.
There are a small handful of aromatics that I do like, but my way of thinking is this; when I pick up a pipe, I want to taste tobacco. If I wanted to taste sugary artificial cherry flavoring, I could eat a piece of candy instead. Heavy aromatics are kind of like the wine coolers of the pipe tobacco world. But hey, some people like wine coolers, and there's nothing wrong with that.
That having been said, there are a lot of lighter aromatic blends that use those flavorings more subtly so that the tobacco is still at the forefront. These are typically the aros that are more likely to appeal to me (Carter Hall, etc.).
Only a few of the candy-aros have cut it for me. Smoker's Pride Rum Cured comes to mind - plain burley with butter rum sauce, but not wet and goopy, so it burns like tobacco should. Most of those heavy aromatics are too hard to light, burn too hot and wet, and have too little tobacco flavor for my liking.
 
Latakia is an aromatic leaf. If latakia is not counted then aromatics still probably make up the majority of what I smoke but at a lesser percent with VaPers coming in a close second.
All tobacco is aromatic. Believe me, my flu smells wonderful after curing some Brightleaf. Even burley has a great smell. But, by definition, an "aromatic blend" is one that is topped with a liquid flavoring. Otherwise, if we include Latakia, then everything just becomes aromatic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pappymac

shanez

Lifer
Jul 10, 2018
5,458
26,143
50
Las Vegas
aromatic

1 of 2
adjective
1
: of, relating to, or having aroma:
a
: having a noticeable and pleasant smell : fragrant
aromatic herbs
aromatic wines
b
: having a strong smell
The peat burns with a pungently aromatic smoke.
c
: having a distinctive quality
2
of an organic compound : characterized by increased chemical stability resulting from the delocalization of electrons in a ring system (such as benzene) containing usually multiple conjugated double bonds

2 of 2
noun
1
: an aromatic plant or plant part
especially : an aromatic herb or spice
2
: an aromatic organic compound
 

shanez

Lifer
Jul 10, 2018
5,458
26,143
50
Las Vegas
All tobacco is aromatic. Believe me, my flu smells wonderful after curing some Brightleaf. Even burley has a great smell. But, by definition, an "aromatic blend" is one that is topped with a liquid flavoring. Otherwise, if we include Latakia, then everything just becomes aromatic.
At some point in history latakia was the definition of aromatic.

Since there is no accepted universal definition of an aromatic blend I no longer regard the term as meaningful in any way and chalk everything up to marketing BS designed to increase sales.
 
At some point in history latakia was the definition of aromatic.

Since there is no accepted universal definition of an aromatic blend I no longer regard the term as meaningful in any way and chalk everything up to marketing BS designed to increase sales.
Do you mean an excerpt from a book that Chasingembers posts when this comes up that says, "latakia is an aromatic..." which means exactly as I posted above. Sure, it does smell stronger than most other leafs, so yeh, it is more aromatic, but it is not in the same category as "aromatics" which came about much more recently in tobacco history. If we start looking to the past to redefine this stuff, then none of us will know what the hell the other is talking about.