I agree. Though it will be one no one thought of that will be the big one.
I’m going to disagree with you on this. The goopers weren’t my choices, but the match blends, Cringle Flakes, and blending components were pretty damned good by today’s standards.Sutliff wasn’t great
“Todays standards”, fine.I’m going to disagree with you on this. The goopers weren’t my choices, but the match blends, Cringle Flakes, and blending components were pretty damned good by today’s standards.
Most of today’s blends don’t hold a candle to what we were smoking decades ago.
But very few of us smoked those blends and are satisfied with today’s products.
If either Sutliff or Mac Barens were actually gold mines, they wouldn't have had to sell out to begin with. And, since I started smoking pipes Sutliff has acted as if it is trying everything to stay afloat, from giving tons of tins away at pipe shows, and CEOs coming and going like a revolving door, moving into the retail side a bit, being sold to Mac B, and then this. Obviously, if they were blends that made money, non of that would have been going on.they realize they are throwing away a gold mine.
Haha. Some ladder-climber in middle management made a bet with the higher ups that he could increase sales by 50% by year end.fun thing here. If they change course we'll never know if it was them feeding the market false information or if they realize they are throwing away a gold mine.
I think when someone says that So and So wasn't great, they mean that they didn't like their products. And, that is fair. I don't like Chevrolet. Doesn't mean that someone doesn't like them.or had mediocre blends
Very well could just be corporate shit talk. But, everything we've heard seems to track.Haha. Some ladder-climber in middle management made a bet with the higher ups that he could increase sales by 50% by year end.
Dunhills did not go away.Well, you have a couple recent examples: Dunhill and McClelland. What are the most sought after from those two these days?
That is a fair enough statement. I am referring to the crowd who typically pile on a brand blindly because they are following the will o' the wisp of group think. There are many Sutliff blends I do not care for - but to castigate all of Sutliff that way - so blindly - all in the name of whatever their "group" tends to do is like the folks who use to say McCelland blends were all ketchup, etc. I should have written less hastily and said more precisely, "Sutliff is not a mediocre brand and only makes mediocre blends." My real point is that five years from now, the very same people who piled on Sutliff in the past will be bidding for old tins of their tobacco on Tinbids.I think when someone says that So and So wasn't great, they mean that they didn't like their products.
They got the money to do those things.If either Sutliff or Mac Barens were actually gold mines, they wouldn't have had to sell out to begin with. And, since I started smoking pipes Sutliff has acted as if it is trying everything to stay afloat, from giving tons of tins away at pipe shows, and CEOs coming and going like a revolving door, moving into the retail side a bit, being sold to Mac B, and then this. Obviously, if they were blends that made money, non of that would have been going on.
C&D is pretty much the brand I guess I am going to smoke.My biggest criticism of them has always been that proprietary casing that they use. It wasn't terrible, just always there. They had a couple things that I liked, but even those, I won't be heart broken to lose them.
I went to The Briary yesterday and tried a few bulk aromatics, just to touch base with aros again, and was reminded of why I do not smoke them.
As a side note, I asked if Skip would be considering C&D blends since the majority of the tobaccos that he carries is either Sutliff or Mac Barens, and was told emphatically that he would not. I already barely go there anymore because I mostly smoke C&D now.
If C&D went out, and if my cellar empty, I would probably just not smoke pipes. But, luckily enough I don't have to worry.
I don't understand who you mean "they" to be, nor what things you mean. The point I was making was that if Sutliff product was actually selling, meaning if people are/were buying it, and they were making money, or had a monetary value at all, then they wouldn't be an add on bonus prize in a corporate take over. They sold out to Mac Baron, for some reason... anyways, they must not be the gold mine that you suggested.They got the money to do those things.
I'll second thatFrosty Mint
For me, I really like their 1849, EGR, and I can smoke Molto Dolce sometimes, and maybe one other. They are like the pretty girl in a room full of knock outs. I like them, but there is so much more in this room.That is a fair enough statement. I am referring to the crowd who typically pile on a brand blindly because they are following the will o' the wisp of group think. There are many Sutliff blends I do not care for - but to castigate all of Sutliff that way - so blindly - all in the name of whatever their "group" tends to do is like the folks who use to say McCelland blends were all ketchup, etc. I should have written less hastily and said more precisely, "Sutliff is not a mediocre brand and only makes mediocre blends." My real point is that five years from now, the very same people who piled on Sutliff in the past will be bidding for old tins of their tobacco on Tinbids.
Sutliff hasn't been an independent company since the late 1960's and that was another case of an owner retiring out and selling the company. They were owned by Altadis, a branch of Imperial Tobacco when they were bought by Mac Baren, and that had to do with a change in Imperial's corporate planning. Sutliff didn't fit into their plans. So they must have had some value or Mac baren wouldn't have bought them.I don't understand who you mean "they" to be, nor what things you mean. The point I was making was that if Sutliff product was actually selling, meaning if people are/were buying it, and they were making money, or had a monetary value at all, then they wouldn't be an add on bonus prize in a corporate take over. They sold out to Mac Baron, for some reason... anyways, they must not be the gold mine that you suggested.
Sutliff acted to me like they had money to burn. Which to me says the products probably were doing a.o.k. but management chose to spend that surplus on things that I have no idea what the return for them was.I don't understand who you mean "they" to be, nor what things you mean.
I think they certainly are. Just because they haven't utilized it properly doesn't mean the products and names don't have untapped value. The issue isn't the market or the product but being able to adapt to the market.The point I was making was that if Sutliff product was actually selling, meaning if people are/were buying it, and they were making money, or had a monetary value at all, then they wouldn't be an add on bonus prize in a corporate take over. They sold out to Mac Baron, for some reason... anyways, they must not be the gold mine that you suggested.
And the knock outs for some reason really like old men with beards and other assorted freaks. I just want to say I think you hit the nail on the head for blends I don't smoke. They're good to great often but I just like the other ones that much more.They are like the pretty girl in a room full of knock outs. I like them, but there is so much more in this room.