Just back from range. Hit a few emoticon buttons but will have to return later on to complete. After 3 or 4 months with handguns, shot my rifles today . . . . like a dorque, too. Even brought the wrong connector adapter for my PCP Air Arms and had only about 25 shots before I fell below the power band. Springer wasn't much better. Best I could manage was a couple of 1/4" groups at 17 yards. Shot one almost 3/4". Then discovered I had loaded .177 diameter pellets into a .22 PCP. Same color and brand cans, but that's just ridiculous. Also forgot my allen keys so couldn't adjust the stock elevation or scope mounts.
Be that as it may, wanted to complete my Rhodesian Meer post of above with some comparative photos for your interest. First one is a comparison of my two large meers:
Depth doesn't translate well in table top photos, but the original is more of a medium, and not as deep as the Rhodesian either. Capacity is about 2/3 of the Rhody, as well. Both are flat at the draft hole - no real trench in either. The following comparison is between the Rhody and my most cavernous pipe (actually a tie with Big Pete, my Savinelli Avorio:
The tobacco leaf is just there to hold the two pipes upright for comparison. The bowl width of both is almost exactly the same, with a miniscule edge to the meer, but the Sav has a bit of a trench below the draft hole, giving it just a shade more capacity. Not much, though, and I'd class these both as large bowls. Don't know if you can see this in the flat perspective in the post . . . . I can in the originals but as I've whined before, color balance and density is not transmitting well from my DSLR to the site.
I'm more than pleased to own both of them, and they'll play a big part in upcoming smoking adventures. Back later tonight.