Vapers? Hmm.. Yes!

Log in

SmokingPipes.com Updates

Watch for Updates Twice a Week

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

Peter Turbo

Lifer
Oct 18, 2021
1,847
15,393
CT, USA
I continually find it hilarious that self-appointed leaders on another board that I frequent cling rather vocally to the delusion that current-production Peterson Elizabethan Match is superior to Sutliff Match Victorian, when it is so obvious that SMV blows the current EM out of the water. Some pipers, man...

I recently had a few bowls of some Peterson Elizabethan Mixture from 2019 and I have to say they were quite delightful. Not overly sweet, light vinegar with some dark fruit and caramel notes, pretty smooth too. I was shocked by this since the last time I smoked it I dont remember experiencing these flavors at all. Not sure if quality has declined since then but what I have is good. I have a few ounces of the match as well and I like that stuff but it doesn't taste like that.

Other than that, as far as VaPers go, I've been enjoying some Marlin Flake and Sillem's Councilor 1695.

Some runners up that have Virginias and Perique but also some Kentucky are Wessex Sovereign and Rattrays Old Gowrie. I like to call these "dirty VaPers" since they contain dfk.
 

khiddy

Part of the Furniture Now
Jun 21, 2024
965
4,497
South Bend, Indiana
blog.hallenius.org
I recently had a few bowls of some Peterson Elizabethan Mixture from 2019 and I have to say they were quite delightful. Not overly sweet, light vinegar with some dark fruit and caramel notes, pretty smooth too. I was shocked by this since the last time I smoked it I dont remember experiencing these flavors at all. Not sure if quality has declined since then but what I have is good. I have a few ounces of the match as well and I like that stuff but it doesn't taste like that.
My Sutliff Match Victorian is from early 2019 if not before (got a 1lb factory-sealed bag via tinbids last year, before tinbids went insane), and it is incredibly chocolatey and fruity, something I've never experienced with the Peterson EM. I'll confess all of the Pete EM that I've ever smoked has been newer than my Sutliff MV, so it's not apples-to-apples, as a bit of age can do wonderful things to well-blended Virginias, as we have seen so many times.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Peter Turbo

rstloup

Lurker
Jan 15, 2023
20
24
My Sutliff Match Victorian is from early 2019 if not before (got a 1lb factory-sealed bag via tinbids last year, before tinbids went insane), and it is incredibly chocolatey and fruity, something I've never experienced with the Peterson EM. I'll confess all of the Pete EM that I've ever smoked has been newer than my Sutliff MV, so it's not apples-to-apples, as a bit of age can do wonderful things to well-blended Virginias, as we have seen so many times.

I like the Peterson blend. When I bought the Sutliff match in 2023 or so, it was very wet and chemically. I jarred it since then and should revisit soon.
 
  • Like
Reactions: khiddy

KingPiper

Starting to Get Obsessed
Mar 8, 2024
147
192
36
Alaska
Do like my Bayou Morning. But, find I like Old Joe Krantz just a tad more. Tend to alternate buying them. Don't seem to buy a blend that doesn't have perique in it.
Yeah that’s me with bayou morning and haunted bookshop. Just loaded up on more of both with the 20% off sale on sp rn. I still haven’t tried ojk original. Still working through the blue label I have and it’s good but nothing I get excited about.
 

irishearl

Lifer
Aug 2, 2016
2,531
4,772
Kansas
Yeah that’s me with bayou morning and haunted bookshop. Just loaded up on more of both with the 20% off sale on sp rn. I still haven’t tried ojk original. Still working through the blue label I have and it’s good but nothing I get excited about.
Definitely try OJK original.