Been a cigar smoker for over 15 years and I've never heard that. Do you have a source for the claim that wrapper contributes "most of the flavor?"
Been a cigar smoker for over a decade and I hear that all the time. It is like "store cigars with or without cello" issue or "smoke a pipe with or without a filter" question, everyone has their own opinions. Regarding the source; according to Ernesto Perez-Carrillo the contribution of a wrapper to the cigar's whole taste profile is 60-70%. Here is the video (the link is timestamped, you will directly go to the part I am talking about):
Just to make it clear, E. P. Carrillo is a cigar maker and his Encore Majestic was chosen as #1 cigar of the year by Cigar Aficionado. There is another cigar roller that I follow on Youtube. He has been dealing with whole leaf tobacco for many years and experimenting with it all the time, I just admire his work. Once someone asked him that question and his answer was "probably 100%". On the other hand, if you ask a Cuban cigar maker he will tell you that the wrapper is just for the sake of beauty, it has nothing to do with the flavor.
So I guess the best answer is "it really depends". What I like doing (just out of curiosity) is by using a double guillotine cutter, I remove an inch or so of the wrapper before smoking the cigar. It is like stripping cable with wire strippers. Then I light up the cigar and smoke an inch of it without the wrapper, when the ember reaches the wrapper I feel the difference if there is any. I remember smoking Ave Maria Knights Templar with and without the wrappers, the taste difference was 15-20%. I had some cigars which tasted like nothing without the wrapper, some that smoked great without its wrapper.
Another issue is the wrapper to filler/binder ratio. Some would claim that because smaller vitolas have more wrapper than filler compared to bigger vitolas, they are more flavorful; simply put, a panatela of Oliva Serie G will smoke better than its gordo. Food for thought.
Last edited: