Alright, I'll play.
Being really good at something which is based on function (a pipe has to "work"), AND based on artistry (imagination, fit, finish, and so forth) means neither of those things can be neglected.
At least someone who knowingly and willingly does can't be considered the "best ever", imo.
Tom's signature models, though---his pencil shank cherrywood/poker and cutty with the "barbershop pole" rustication & sandblast---have a baked-in flaw that's never been addressed.
They are small pipes to start with, and the spiral grooving plus the blasting plus the airway means the shank cross sectional area is wiwwy wiwwy small. (Thank you Elmer Fudd) Add the stress riser component created by the surface etching & grooving, and you have an overly delicate shank.
Not arguable. I've seen, handled, and fixed more of them than I can remember over many years. Sometimes the shank has snapped simply from the torque of stem insertion, no drop involved.
The fix is simple: Put it back together with a properly incorporated stainless steel tube. Done right, it's invisible, and the pipe is literally better than new because it won't break again.
It can be done as part of the original creation process if desired, in fact.
(Scottie Piersel is smiling)
But it never has been, even though that weak-shanked namesake finish and model pair of pipes has been in production for decades.
My point? Tom sure is one hell of a devoted, experienced creator of artistic pipes, and has been for half a century.
But in my mind, terms like "best ever" or "greatest ever" automatically include things like making evolutionary improvements to your output/products when weaknesses in their design are discovered.