I've read opinions on both sides of this question. I've heard some smokers say 'don't worry about it, fill it, smoke it, and don't look back. Others have said fill in varying levels to build carbon. Does it really matter? And why?
The universal advice from every pipe manufacturer 80 years ago when there were fifty or more times pipes sold than today was to break in a new pipe slowly, and I use a dab of honey.I've read opinions on both sides of this question. I've heard some smokers say 'don't worry about it, fill it, smoke it, and don't look back. Others have said fill in varying levels to build carbon. Does it really matter? And why?
I never smoked a new pipe in any other way than I would after 100th smoke. Ive also smoked new pipes with any tobacco, from English to Virginia to Burley. But your style of breaking in a pipe might vary from anyond else, so I would say experiment with it.I've read opinions on both sides of this question. I've heard some smokers say 'don't worry about it, fill it, smoke it, and don't look back. Others have said fill in varying levels to build carbon. Does it really matter? And why?
I break them in with the blend or genre that I purchased the pipe for including Lakelands.Nobody has mentioned using Lakeland tobaccos to break a new pipe in.
I wasn't going to recommend it, although your plan seems sound. However, I've been down the path of assigning a blend to a pipe from new, only to find it a bad match and plans being scuppered.I break them in with the blend or genre that I purchased the pipe for including Lakelands.
Other than aesthetics I've not found one pipe to smoke any differently from another. My pairings are mostly whimsical and based on how a pipe reminds me of a blend.I wasn't going to recommend it, although your plan seems sound. However, I've been down the path of assigning a blend to a pipe from new, only to find it a bad match and plans being scuppered.