It's a pretty broad swath of the brush to paint all declarations that a blend has changed on bad memory. I have old and new tins of Escudo, so I can and do verify my claim that it has changed. Does it matter?
I remember when the older smokers were in all a tizzy that Three Nuns was not anything like the original, and I think it hurt sales for them, but GOOD! A lot of smokers buy Escudo, Capstan, Balkan Sobranie to taste something that connects them to smokers of antiquity, but If only the name is the same, then it is all just a bait and switch.
Sure, it is easier to sell something with an old name on it :::cough cough WarHorse cough cough::: because the name is 90% of the marketing. It is way easier sell than to just start fresh with a new name. Guys will buy it just for that connection to antiquity.
Escudo was lucky enough to have been the premier VaPer for decades, maybe even a century, but then when new company buys and changes it, we should feel duped. It is no longer that iconoclastic blend that it was, and STG benefits with sales based off of the older better version.
What about Erinmore? It used to be a powerhouse nicotine head kick and the topping was much stronger in flavor. Now, it is the ultralight version of what it once was with barely any of the flavor, however people still buy it based on talk from before the change. The Astley blends... There are probably hundreds of posts I have made about how wonderful it was, but then the change hit, and the company gets to still benefit from all of those rave reviews? And, then there are older posters like cigrmaster who keeps suggesting it, because he only has the older versions, and may not be aware that the flavors have shifted dramatically.
Then there is GH&co, which drives me crazy, because from one day to the next the exact samely named tobacco changes flavors, because their just in there dumping stuff on it willy nilly... which makes discussing one of their blends like a madhouse... "No, it doesn't have rose geranium," "yes it does," "no it has almonds," Mine never tasted like almonds..." but who the hell knows, because we all may have something entirely different that we are reporting on. I just formally declare as of now that all GH&co tobacco tasting discussions are moot... and silly... till they get their act together and figure out what flavors go on what.
Changes just wreak chaos, in discussing tobaccos, and this is what we are here for, right? If it pisses in your corn flakes to have someone point these things out, then I say grow some thicker skin. Or, go find an echo chamber and pat each other on the back.