Skippy's Blend of the Week

Log in

SmokingPipes.com Updates

Watch for Updates Twice a Week

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

Skippy B. Coyote

Part of the Furniture Now
Jun 19, 2023
543
6,576
St. Paul, MN
War Horse Green First Impressions

View attachment 332408

Well hot dang! Four months of aging War Horse Green in a Ball jar seems to have completely removed that strange chemical note that reminded me of mothballs and after smoking it half a dozen times this past week I really like it now! I do believe that after this week's 1792 Flake review I'm going to have to revisit and re-review War Horse Green, and War Horse Bar too for that matter. A little bit of aging really did wonders for both War Horse blends! 😄
 

Skippy B. Coyote

Part of the Furniture Now
Jun 19, 2023
543
6,576
St. Paul, MN
The base tobaccos are really good in this one. I've smoked it without the toppings and it's excellent. Too bad things didn't work out differently, I would have liked to have released an unflavored version, maybe call it Peace Pony.

Warhorse tin art design by....me. That was fun.

That is incredibly cool that you got to design the tin art for War Horse! I think it's very fitting and you did a fantastic job on it! After giving them a little time to age I can safely say that both the Bar and Green are some of the most delightfully weird and wonderful blends I've ever had the pleasure of smoking, and I'm going to be pretty crushed if STG ends up discontinuing them when they take over Sutliff.

I think I'm going to be spending the next few months hoarding as much War Horse Bar and War Horse Green as I can reasonably afford to, and I won't be satisfied until I have a pound of each in my cellar. Come to think of it, I've actually never purchased more than 2 ounces of any pipe blend before so the two War Horses will be the first blends to ever get deep cellared for me.puffy
 

Infantry23

Part of the Furniture Now
Nov 8, 2020
879
2,519
44
Smithsburg, Maryland
The base tobaccos are really good in this one. I've smoked it without the toppings and it's excellent. Too bad things didn't work out differently, I would have liked to have released an unflavored version, maybe call it Peace Pony.

Warhorse tin art design by....me. That was fun.
Honestly, the Warhorse tin art might be my favorite of all-time. Nightcap is really cool in my opinion, but there's something nostalgic, basic, yet completely perfect in the design.
 

Steddy

Lifer
Sep 18, 2021
1,409
24,125
Western North Carolina
The base tobaccos are really good in this one. I've smoked it without the toppings and it's excellent. Too bad things didn't work out differently, I would have liked to have released an unflavored version, maybe call it Peace Pony.

Warhorse tin art design by....me. That was fun.
Tin art- looks like shit.
Tobacco- tastes like shit.
“Try it!” Or something like that.

I’m joking of course, in your style of advertising that never came to be.
 

MisterBadger

Part of the Furniture Now
Oct 6, 2024
618
4,539
Ludlow, UK
For next week's blend of the week I've been so enjoying the dark Lakelands lately that I think I'm going to do another! If Coniston Cut Plug didn't have a heavy enough dose of tonquin for your liking then I think you'll get all the tonquin you could possibly want from...

Samuel Gawith 1792 Flake
@Skippy B. Coyote - You have no idea just how much I am looking forward to this review... :LOL:
 

anotherbob

Lifer
Mar 30, 2019
16,825
31,566
46
In the semi-rural NorthEastern USA
Well, my plan to resume and keep up with Blend of the Week sure didn't go as planned! Between the knee injury making it hard to get around, the weather getting cold enough that I haven't wanted to sit outside and smoke too often, and getting a little weary of the structured routine of making time to smoke a pipe and write down my thoughts on the blend everyday I just burnt out on the project.

I have still been smoking my pipe a couple times a week the past month, mainly puffing a few different straight Virginias that I've yet to review (Mac Baren HH Pure Virginia and C&D Yorktown for the most part) though tonight I'm trying out G.L. Pease Navigator for the first time; and surprised to find that it's kind of kicking my butt! I think my nicotine tolerance must have dropped a bit during my absence. 😅

View attachment 350346


In any case, I hope to return to Blend of the Week soon as my knees continue to heal and you folks will be the first to know when I do! Take care and I hope you've all been having a pleasant and smokey autumn. puffy
I will always get excited when someone enjoys Yorktown. It's my main blend. Love that one so damn much.
 

Skippy B. Coyote

Part of the Furniture Now
Jun 19, 2023
543
6,576
St. Paul, MN
I will always get excited when someone enjoys Yorktown. It's my main blend. Love that one so damn much.

Yorktown is great! I was actually just smoking some on a dog walk this afternoon. It's by far the most convenient pure Virginia I've tried since it comes in a pre-dried ribbon cut so it's easy to just throw some in a pipe and go with no need to rub out flakes or give it any dry time, and most of the time it'll smoke all the way down to the bottom of the bowl from the charring light with no relights needed.

I also like the fairly even balance of bright and red Virginias, and the flavors really pop! Virginias can often be really soft and subtle with their flavors but the brights and reds in Yorktown are both pretty bold and in-your-face in that classic brash Cornell & Diehl style, which personally I think is a great thing! There's no navel gazing required to notice all the flavors in Yorktown.

It's definitely one of my all around favorite pure Virginias, though I think I might like G.L. Pease Union Square just a tiny bit better on account of how it leans more heavily into the reds and uses the brights as more of a condiment; which the soft palate on the roof my mouth appreciates since brights tend to sting it a bit after a couple bowls. Yorktown is still one of those blends I find myself constantly reaching for though when I just want to load a pipe to take with me somewhere and don't know what I want to smoke, since it's just such a convenient and always satisfying blend.
 

Grangerous

Lifer
Dec 8, 2020
3,516
14,600
East Coast USA
I will always get excited when someone enjoys Yorktown. It's my main blend. Love that one so damn much.
I just obtained a tin of Yorktown today in my order from SmokingPipes along with Crooner (Bulk Purchase-I like Crooner) C&D Americana and I went out on a limb and grabbed a tin of C&D Founding Fathers.

And I grabbed the Yorktown because of your enthusiasm, AnotherBob. Jeez, you’d think it’s as good as Granger the way you speak of it!

Can’t wait to try the Virginia of All Virginia’s. Red Stoved and Bright Stoved and ReStoved and Straight Red…. I’m on it. I’ll let ya know.

Thanks, Skippy. I am thoroughly enjoying your thoughtful reviews.
 

anotherbob

Lifer
Mar 30, 2019
16,825
31,566
46
In the semi-rural NorthEastern USA
I just obtained a tin of Yorktown today in my order from SmokingPipes along with Crooner (Bulk Purchase-I like Crooner) C&D Americana and I went out on a limb and grabbed a tin of C&D Founding Fathers.

And I grabbed the Yorktown because of your enthusiasm, AnotherBob. Jeez, you’d think it’s as good as Granger the way you speak of it!

Can’t wait to try the Virginia of All Virginia’s. Red Stoved and Bright Stoved and ReStoved and Straight Red…. I’m on it. I’ll let ya know.

Thanks, Skippy. I am thoroughly enjoying your thoughtful reviews.
I hope you love it. Those are some good blends by the way.
 

Skippy B. Coyote

Part of the Furniture Now
Jun 19, 2023
543
6,576
St. Paul, MN
I just obtained a tin of Yorktown today in my order from SmokingPipes along with Crooner (Bulk Purchase-I like Crooner) C&D Americana and I went out on a limb and grabbed a tin of C&D Founding Fathers.

And I grabbed the Yorktown because of your enthusiasm, AnotherBob. Jeez, you’d think it’s as good as Granger the way you speak of it!

Can’t wait to try the Virginia of All Virginia’s. Red Stoved and Bright Stoved and ReStoved and Straight Red…. I’m on it. I’ll let ya know.

Thanks, Skippy. I am thoroughly enjoying your thoughtful reviews.

You're very welcome! My best advice with Yorktown is to crack the tin right away then seal up the tobacco in a Ball jar for about 2 weeks before giving it a try. Straight out of the tin I actually found the aroma and flavors to be a little flat, but after exposing it to air and giving it a couple weeks in a jar to develop it's flavors oh boy is it ever a goodie!
 

Skippy B. Coyote

Part of the Furniture Now
Jun 19, 2023
543
6,576
St. Paul, MN
Blend of the Week #11: Samuel Gawith 1792 Flake

IMG_9465~2.JPG


I'm going to start off this review with a rather controversial bit of speculation: I think 1792 Flake is a pure Virginia. It's a dark fired African Virginia so the flavor is a little different from US grown Virginias, but it smokes like a pure Virginia, has the mouth feel of a pure Virginia, and the room note of a pure Virginia so I feel reasonably confident in asserting that it is indeed a pure Virginia. There's no hickory smoked barbeque pit Dark Fired Kentucky flavor here nor does it have the smoke density, throat scratch, or heavy room note of a blend containing Burley; it seems to be a pure dark fired Virginia through and through.

That matter out of the way, the tin aroma of 1792 Flake is... unique. There's just no other way to say it, this stuff smells like a pack of Black Cat firecrackers (and the strength of it's nicotine content is not dissimilar to a firecracker). It reminds me a lot of the way the air smells on 4th of July, all warm and summery with a firecracker'y gunpowder aroma behind all the natural grassy summer evening scents. As weird as it is for a pipe blend to smell like fireworks in the summer, I actually really like it since it's an aroma I have a lot of positive associations with.

Flavor wise though 1792 Flake is kind of a two note wonder. There's the dark, earthy, woody, fireplace smokey dark fired Virginia and a whole heckuva lot of slightly herbal vanilla'y tonquin bean, but it is a good combo. The tonquin topping blends with the natural flavors of the dark fired Virginia tobacco so well that it's often difficult to tell where the tobacco ends and the tonquin begins, and neither flavor overpowers the other. It's a very harmonious blend and I think tonquin was the perfect topping choice for this one. Also, in spite of 1792 Flake being a Gawith blend you'll find no floral Lakeland essence whatsoever in this one.

The mouth feel of the smoke is light and pleasant like a pure Virginia, and the retrohale is smooth and surprisingly gentle for a blend of such strength with only an occasional mild tingle through the sinuses. As with most Samuel Gawith blends though, even when dried well before smoking it does still require quite a few relights. After smoking it leaves the bowl clean and dry with almost no moisture to speak of and no ghost at all.

The room note is quite light and mellow as well, combining a bit of fireplace smokiness with the aroma of bread baking in the oven that pure Virginias are known for; with a little touch of some vanilla confection from the tonquin. 1792 is one of the few very strong blends that I think non-smokers would find the scent of to be appealing, assuming they don't mind the smokey fireplace aroma aspect.

I won't go into too much detail about the nicotine content, since I feel like I covered all the warnings and precautions about Gawith's dark range pretty well in last week's Coniston Cut Plug review, but suffice it to say that regardless of your experience level as a tobacco enthusiast, 1792 Flake will slap you in the face and call you a sissy. It's right up there at the top of the "extra strong" category and 15 or 20 minute smokes are about my limit with this one. Thankfully it relights quite well and never turns harsh even when the pipe is put down and relit hours later or the next day, so it's easy to just smoke a little bit here and there as your nicotine tolerance allows.


I've had a bit of back and forth relationship with 1792, initially finding myself repelled by the Black Cat firecracker tin note and tonquin flavoring before eventually developing a fondness for it. Then late one night last summer I foolishly smoked it on an empty stomach without sipping it slow and respecting it and got (understandably) horrendously ill with nicotine sickness. After that I refused to smoke 1792 for many months, before eventually coming back around to it again and sipping it with the measure of respect it not only deserves but demands. Now I've been having a pretty good experience!

It smokes well and is very smooth, has as much nicotine as anyone could ask for, and is overall just a very nicely behaved blend. However, this is not a terribly complex blend with a lot of intricate flavor nuances to suss out. 1792 Flake is a blunt instrument. From it's presentation to it's flavor profile and strength it's all fairly simple and straightforward. You get dark fired Virginia, tonquin bean, and a whole lotta nicotine. If that's what you're after then you'll certainly find it here, but if you're in the market for something more complex with lots of subtle ever-changing flavors then you might be served better by other blends in Gawith's dark range like Dark Flake Aromatic or Coniston Cut Plug; and that's kinda where I fall on this one.

1792 isn't a bad blend by any means, but after smoking it every day for a week there just wasn't enough variety to the flavor profile to keep me interested. It was just the same two flavor notes every puff every time and by the halfway point of the week I was already feeling bored of 1792 and wishing I was smoking something else, so for me this one sadly isn't a keeper. I'd highly encourage anyone else looking for a nicotine rich yet still very smooth blend to give Samuel Gawith 1792 Flake a try though! Just because it wasn't for me doesn't mean it won't be for you, and you may find that you appreciate 1792's consistent flavor more than I did.puffy





In other news, this week I had a very difficult choice to make. With the impending closure of Sutliff in February and somewhat limited finances on my part, I had enough funds to either purchase a lifetime supply of my all time favorite summer blend (and all around favorite Virginia blend) Sutliff 507C Virginia Slices or stock up on War Horse Bar and War Horse Green, which I do like but haven't thoroughly smoked enough to determine how I'll really feel about them over the long-term. With only enough funds to choose one, I went with the 507C Virginia Slices since I know it's my favorite summertime blend that I never want to have to go a summer without, and with 3 pounds of it on the way and the plan to acquire another 2 pounds next week I should have enough to smoke a couple ounces every summer for the rest of my days; which if I'm lucky will be another 40 years or so.

With my favorite Virginia fairly well secured that got me thinking about other bulk blends I might want to never be without and could reasonably afford to cellar a lifetime supply of, and there are definitely a couple that come to mind. So, for next week's blend of the week I'm doing a Burley blend that I'm extraordinarily fond of! Historically I've had difficulty smoking Burleys, since even though I love the flavor of Burley it can give me a pretty sore throat, but as my smoking technique has improved I've learned that if I keep the tobacco burning very slow and cool, sip the smoke gently, and dump out the bowl when it gets down to the bottom third and starts turning harsh I can usually have a pipe of Burley without getting a sore throat. With that in mind, next week's blend of the week is...


Cornell & Diehl Pegasus

IMG_9478~2.JPG
 
Last edited:

Skippy B. Coyote

Part of the Furniture Now
Jun 19, 2023
543
6,576
St. Paul, MN
Cool thread! I’m in the same boat with my cellar, I don’t know how many blends I have yet to try this thread is getting me excited about exploring them.

Thank ye kindly! I'm definitely happy I decided to take on this project, since it's really helping me finally get around to smoking all those blends I bought and giving them a fair shake. My only advice would be to not make a strict schedule for yourself about the order in which you try all your blends, since you may not feel like smoking a particular type of blend when the week you scheduled to smoke it rolls around. Just grab whatever sounds good at the start of the week and give it a go!puffy
 

Skippy B. Coyote

Part of the Furniture Now
Jun 19, 2023
543
6,576
St. Paul, MN
Blend of the Week #11: Samuel Gawith 1792 Flake

View attachment 355556


I'm going to start off this review with a rather controversial bit of speculation: I think 1792 Flake is a pure Virginia. It's a dark fired African Virginia so the flavor is a little different from US grown Virginias, but it smokes like a pure Virginia, has the mouth feel of a pure Virginia, and the room note of a pure Virginia so I feel reasonably confident in asserting that it is indeed a pure Virginia. There's no hickory smoked barbeque pit Dark Fired Kentucky flavor here nor does it have the smoke density, throat scratch, or heavy room note of a blend containing Burley; it seems to be a pure dark fired Virginia through and through.

That matter out of the way, the tin aroma of 1792 Flake is... unique. There's just no other way to say it, this stuff smells like a pack of Black Cat firecrackers (and the strength of it's nicotine content is not dissimilar to a firecracker). It reminds me a lot of the way the air smells on 4th of July, all warm and summery with a firecracker'y gunpowder aroma behind all the natural grassy summer evening scents. As weird as it is for a pipe blend to smell like fireworks in the summer, I actually really like it since it's an aroma I have a lot of positive associations with.

Flavor wise though 1792 Flake is kind of a two note wonder. There's the dark, earthy, woody, fireplace smokey dark fired Virginia and a whole heckuva lot of slightly herbal vanilla'y tonquin bean, but it is a good combo. The tonquin topping blends with the natural flavors of the dark fired Virginia tobacco so well that it's often difficult to tell where the tobacco ends and the tonquin begins, and neither flavor overpowers the other. It's a very harmonious blend and I think tonquin was the perfect topping choice for this one. Also, in spite of 1792 Flake being a Gawith blend you'll find no floral Lakeland essence whatsoever in this one.

The mouth feel of the smoke is light and pleasant like a pure Virginia, and the retrohale is smooth and surprisingly gentle for a blend of such strength with only an occasional mild tingle through the sinuses. As with most Samuel Gawith blends though, even when dried well before smoking it does still require quite a few relights. After smoking it leaves the bowl clean and dry with almost no moisture to speak of and no ghost at all.

The room note is quite light and mellow as well, combining a bit of fireplace smokiness with the aroma of bread baking in the oven that pure Virginias are known for; with a little touch of some vanilla confection from the tonquin. 1792 is one of the few very strong blends that I think non-smokers would find the scent of to be appealing, assuming they don't mind the smokey fireplace aroma aspect.

I won't go into too much detail about the nicotine content, since I feel like I covered all the warnings and precautions about Gawith's dark range pretty well in last week's Coniston Cut Plug review, but suffice it to say that regardless of your experience level as a tobacco enthusiast, 1792 Flake will slap you in the face and call you a sissy. It's right up there at the top of the "extra strong" category and 15 or 20 minute smokes are about my limit with this one. Thankfully it relights quite well and never turns harsh even when the pipe is put down and relit hours later or the next day, so it's easy to just smoke a little bit here and there as your nicotine tolerance allows.


I've had a bit of back and forth relationship with 1792, initially finding myself repelled by the Black Cat firecracker tin note and tonquin flavoring before eventually developing a fondness for it. Then late one night last summer I foolishly smoked it on an empty stomach without sipping it slow and respecting it and got (understandably) horrendously ill with nicotine sickness. After that I refused to smoke 1792 for many months, before eventually coming back around to it again and sipping it with the measure of respect it not only deserves but demands. Now I've been having a pretty good experience!

It smokes well and is very smooth, has as much nicotine as anyone could ask for, and is overall just a very nicely behaved blend. However, this is not a terribly complex blend with a lot of intricate flavor nuances to suss out. 1792 Flake is a blunt instrument. From it's presentation to it's flavor profile and strength it's all fairly simple and straightforward. You get dark fired Virginia, tonquin bean, and a whole lotta nicotine. If that's what you're after then you'll certainly find it here, but if you're in the market for something more complex with lots of subtle ever-changing flavors then you might be served better by other blends in Gawith's dark range like Dark Flake Aromatic or Coniston Cut Plug; and that's kinda where I fall on this one.

1792 isn't a bad blend by any means, but after smoking it every day for a week there just wasn't enough variety to the flavor profile to keep me interested. It was just the same two flavor notes every puff every time and by the halfway point of the week I was already feeling bored of 1792 and wishing I was smoking something else, so for me this one sadly isn't a keeper. I'd highly encourage anyone else looking for a nicotine rich yet still very smooth blend to give Samuel Gawith 1792 Flake a try though! Just because it wasn't for me doesn't mean it won't be for you, and you may find that you appreciate 1792's consistent flavor more than I did.puffy





In other news, this week I had a very difficult choice to make. With the impending closure of Sutliff in February and somewhat limited finances on my part, I had enough funds to either purchase a lifetime supply of my all time favorite summer blend (and all around favorite Virginia blend) Sutliff 507C Virginia Slices or stock up on War Horse Bar and War Horse Green, which I do like but haven't thoroughly smoked enough to determine how I'll really feel about them over the long-term. With only enough funds to choose one, I went with the 507C Virginia Slices since I know it's my favorite summertime blend that I never want to have to go a summer without, and with 3 pounds of it on the way and the plan to acquire another 2 pounds next week I should have enough to smoke a couple ounces every summer for the rest of my days; which if I'm lucky will be another 40 years or so.

With my favorite Virginia fairly well secured that got me thinking about other bulk blends I might want to never be without and could reasonably afford to cellar a lifetime supply of, and there are definitely a couple that come to mind. So, for next week's blend of the week I'm doing a Burley blend that I'm extraordinarily fond of! Historically I've had difficulty smoking Burleys, since even though I love the flavor of Burley it can give me a pretty sore throat, but as my smoking technique has improved I've learned that if I keep the tobacco burning very slow and cool, sip the smoke gently, and dump out the bowl when it gets down to the bottom third and starts turning harsh I can usually have a pipe of Burley without getting a sore throat. With that in mind, next week's blend of the week is...


Cornell & Diehl Pegasus

View attachment 355560


1792 Flake Review Addendum

Reviewing tobacco blends can be difficult, because there's really two sides to it. On one side I'm trying to be impartial and objective about things like what the tobacco smells like, what it tastes like, what it's burn characteristics and nicotine content are, and so on. But, my final verdict on a blend really comes down to my personal preference and what I as a pipe smoker personally enjoy or dislike; which might be very different from what you as a pipe smoker enjoy or dislike.

As a case in point: After smoking mostly dark fired blends for quite awhile, this week I decided to smoke a Burley/Virginia blend (with a little unsweetened Black Cavendish) and smoking it almost immediately reminded me that my personal preference is more for dark fired blends. In fact, after smoking Pegasus for a couple days I went back and tried last week's 1792 Flake again after declaring it "not a keeper" and the flavor difference between the air and flue cured tobaccos in Pegasus and the dark fired tobaccos in 1792 was so stark and shocking to my palate that I immediately reversed course on last week's decision and put 1792 Flake on my keeper shelf; promising to never say a disparaging word about it again.

It may not be a complex blend, but it is a dark fired blend and when it comes to darker, earthier tasting tobaccos that's what my palate prefers the overwhelming majority of the time. It just took stepping back and smoking a blend that wasn't dark fired for me to really appreciate how much I did actually like 1792 Flake and all the things it does well. I still think 1792 is a fairly simple and straightforward blend, but it does capture that super smooth and non-abrasive dark fired Virginia profile I like so much; which is something only a handful of tobaccos currently on the market do. I may not want to smoke it every day, but I think it's worth keeping around for the variety.

You live, you learn.puffy
 

Grangerous

Lifer
Dec 8, 2020
3,516
14,600
East Coast USA
1792 Flake Review Addendum

Reviewing tobacco blends can be difficult, because there's really two sides to it. On one side I'm trying to be impartial and objective about things like what the tobacco smells like, what it tastes like, what it's burn characteristics and nicotine content are, and so on. But, my final verdict on a blend really comes down to my personal preference and what I as a pipe smoker personally enjoy or dislike; which might be very different from what you as a pipe smoker enjoy or dislike.

As a case in point: After smoking mostly dark fired blends for quite awhile, this week I decided to smoke a Burley/Virginia blend (with a little unsweetened Black Cavendish) and smoking it almost immediately reminded me that my personal preference is more for dark fired blends. In fact, after smoking Pegasus for a couple days I went back and tried last week's 1792 Flake again after declaring it "not a keeper" and the the flavor difference between the air and flue cured tobaccos in Pegasus and the dark fired tobaccos in 1792 was so stark and shocking to my palate that I immediately reversed course on last week's decision and put 1792 Flake on my keeper shelf; promising to never say a disparaging word about it again.

It may not be a complex blend, but it is a dark fired blend and when it comes to darker, earthier tasting tobaccos that's what my palate prefers the overwhelming majority of the time. It just took stepping back and smoking a blend that wasn't dark fired for me to really appreciate how much I did actually like 1792 Flake and all the things it does well. I still think 1792 is a fairly simple and straightforward blend, but it does capture that super smooth and non-abrasive dark fired Virginia profile I like so much; which is something only a dozen or so tobaccos currently on the market do. I may not want to smoke it every day, but I think it's worth keeping around for the variety.

You live, you learn.puffy
Skippy,
If you reverse those blends, I could’ve written this. Having had my passing interest in HH Dark Fired and English blends, Pegasus, which I consider the definitive sweet, rich, nutty VaBur makes my smile even wider.

Keep up the reviews. Your posts are a breath of fresh air, Skip.
 

Skippy B. Coyote

Part of the Furniture Now
Jun 19, 2023
543
6,576
St. Paul, MN
Skippy,
If you reverse those blends, I could’ve written this. Having had my passing interest in HH Dark Fired and English blends, Pegasus, which I consider the definitive sweet, rich, nutty VaBur makes my smile even wider.

Keep up the reviews. Your posts are a breath of fresh air, Skip.

Thank you Grangerous! Not to give any spoilers for next week's review, but the funny thing is that to me Pegasus has always been the quintessential perfect Burley blend. Like what you would get if you took a classic codger blend like Granger, Prince Albert, or Carter Hall then removed all the casings and used the absolute highest quality Burleys that money could buy to blend them.

It's the perfect Burley blend in my book and I thought I really loved it, but then again the last time I smoked it was probably at least 7 or 8 months ago and since then I seem to have developed more of a taste for dark fired leaf. Plus the Pegasus is still giving me a sore throat in spite of my best efforts to smoke it slow and gently, which is a problem I don't seem to have with fire cured and steam pressed blends. 😅

On a side note, have you ever tried Briar Fox? I've found it to be very similar to Pegasus but with a greater portion of Virginias in the mix so the Burleys and Virginias are relatively equal in flavor, whereas with Pegasus it's more the Burleys that are the star of the show. If you like Pegasus though I think you might find Briar Fox to be really enjoyable too!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Grangerous

Grangerous

Lifer
Dec 8, 2020
3,516
14,600
East Coast USA
On a side note, have you ever tried Briar Fox? I've found it to be very similar to Pegasus but with a greater portion of Virginias in the mix so the Burleys and Virginias are relatively equal in flavor, whereas with Pegasus it's more the Burleys that are the star of the show. If you like Pegasus though I think you might find Briar Fox to be really enjoyable too!
I have tried Briar Fox. It’s funny because @didimauw really enjoys Briar Fox and and he and I share similar taste in tobacco. But I don’t reach for it. The positives? I love the crumble cake. It loads easily and smokes well. I even enjoy it’s flavor. But it, to me is a wispy, light smoke that can be cigarette-like. (I’ve never smoked cigarettes.)

I like more body in my blends. A creamier smoke. Burley forward blends provide that bass note I suppose.