Ready yourselves, here's another two coppers being tossed into the ring:
On the one hand, Kevin, as the service provider, is legitimately concerned about needing click-throughs (the advertisers that pay $x.xx for every unique click on an ad impression) as well as overall site traffic (5,000 unique IPs visited / month = $x.xx amount of advertiser flat-fee charge) to continue to provide the service of this website. I support this wholeheartedly.
On the other hand, I, as the audience / consumer, despise the intrusive nature of most forms of internet advertising, and use an ad blocking plug-in on my browser.
This is very easy to solve.
One thing that has not been mentioned is that even with an ad blocker running, it is very easy to SELECTIVELY choose a site to allow ads on; in other words, you don't need to remember to turn it off when visiting this site, turning it on when leaving, getting confused and having an aneurism when those animated ads hijack your mouse, et cetera. Most (but perhaps not all) ad blockers have the option to "whitelist" a site--in other words, to allow a domain to run its regular advertising content. On my particular program I merely need to right-click an empty area of the page and choose "Don't run on this domain" to whitelist pipesmagazine.com. Your program may differ. You may need to make a selection in the program or browser preferences, or something else entirely; if you're able to navigate to this site in the first place you should be able to figure out how to do it on your browser. You can always search "whitelist domain {my ad block program}" for a complete walkthrough. As Kevin so rightly points out, the ads for this site are only ads that our type of folk would want to see anyway--so, my personal choice will be to whitelist this domain and make it a point to get a few clicks on adverts in every time I visit. Simple enough, considering how much time I spend plugged into the darn machine anyway. I also encourage others to invest the time and effort (seconds? perhaps a whole minute?) to do this as well.
Now, the second of my 2 cents' worth: it has also been very rightly pointed out that in the current paradigm of revenue, this site would likely collapse if you were to charge for something that could be gotten for free elsewhere. There was a famous parable drawn about a golden statue with feet of clay.... If the community moves away, so will the advertising, and it will be a sad day for the angels of the smoke. However, there are viable solutions to this: alter the paradigm. To create a tangible single-direction revenue stream (meaning how to charge for something), simply create something to charge *for*. Create content that can only be accessed by a subscriber. Provide perks for contributing--a hat for a $25 contribution or a pipe rack for $50, etc., say, or a deal with a pipe maker / retailer / tobacconist for a subscriber discount / gift certificate / freebie. Contests. The possibilities are myriad. In fact this thread has already started brainstorming just that. Kudos to us!
You see where I'm going with this--value is perception, as we all know from the prices we've paid for some of our treasures only to be told by the uninitiated, "You paid HOW much for a chunk of wood with a hole in it?!?!?"
Value and service can be created and maintained very easily, with just some patience, ingenuity, good intention and know-how. But the most valuable thing, THIS COMMUNITY, can be evaporated just as easily with the wrong moves. To that extent I very much applaud Kevin's first reaction--that he came to the community to express his viewpoint, and to ask for ours. And to everyone else for chiming in and maintaining support.
/deep breath/
Ok, I think I'm done with the soapbox now. Next!