Hi, I understand the difference between a civil trial and a criminal trial, ala OJ. My point was that two officers were tried twice CRIMINALLY, one in CA state courts ( acquited), the second time in Federal courts, "guilty."
It's not the first time it's happened; I just am sooo uncomfortable with the concept of trying someone for Federal "civil rights violations," after he's been acquited of basically the same act at the state level.
The award of nearly $4 million, as i remember it, was not against the officers involved; it resulted from King's civil suit against the city of LA, as pointed out, a civil action. In the King incident, there is no parallel to the OJ situation. OJ was the defendant in both the criminal and civil actions. Again, depending on my very faulty memory, OJ never paid a penny of the judgment in the civil action, so he skated twice. For OJ some justice came much later in a different venue.
jr/john