I do not have the intimate details, but I do know the Will was changed within the last year while the dad was Ill, not dying, but sick. He was expected to be ok. I BELIEVE the previous Will had the brother as the one to recieve much of the collection. The son was taking care of his dad, and dad was on pretty high doses of pain killers when the Will was redone. The main issue is the brother says the dad changed his 25 year old Will, while sick and shortly before he died.Generally speaking in most jurisdictions, the parol evidence rule, in the context of testate (I.e., will) contests, prevents the use of outside (extrinsic) evidence, including prior oral statements by the decedent, to contradict or alter the clear, unambiguous terms of a written will.
Similarly, evidentiary rules such as Federal Rule of Evidence 408, prohibit the admissibility of oral statements made during settlement negotiations.
All cases are fact and jurisdiction specific, but I’m failing to see what the issue is here unless the brother is claiming an inter vivos (while the decedent was living) ownership interest in the guns, such as having actually contributed to their purchase.
My friend told me the legal terminology but I don't remember.
My friends lawyer says there is nothing to worry about, it's just going to need some time.












