Today I received my first new Peterson pipe, one exactly like this.
I intend for it to be a regular, work-horse type of smoker, one that I can grab regularly and enjoy. Given that, aesthetic perfection is not necessary, but I'm surprised. The stamping on both the briar, as well as the silver, are truly lacking in neatness, clarity and crispness. Not horrid, but "off".
Again, I bought it for smoking, and anticipate good quality in that regard. Given that, the first thing I did was grab some sandpaper and remove that coating I've read so much about here in the forums. Not even gonna try it for myself and waste a bowl of tobacco finding out. It's gone.
Did I take pictures of the stamping "defects"? No, I only had a short time and was more eager to get it sanded out so I could load a bowl when I got home tonight.
I did crack open a new tin of Peterson Standard that I ordered to go with it. Haven't had that blend yet but I like enough of their other blends that it's probably acceptable.
So is it common for new stamps to be a little off or not deeply embedded? I've regularly seen descriptions on smoking pipes that indicate: "stamping worn from buffing"; or similar statements.
This makes me think that not all of the "worn from buffing" is necessarily true, it might be low quality stamping from the start.
Mine is.