Seems to me that we have two distinct issues. One is with the packaging, which Trish has very candidly admitted to, has shared her plan of action to remedy the problem and asked us to assist in monitoring her success. Secondly, is quality assurance on the pipes themselves, which, it seems to me, is an issue with the maker's qa, not the retailer's. If I were to purchase a low end (or high end) pipe made by X, I would certainly not expect perfection. I can't even begin to afford perfection in any pipe. If the pipe was below even an acceptable standard for a pipe in that price range my take away lesson would be, "Don't make that mistake again." I would hold the maker responsible and be thrilled if the retailer were to take on the responsibility for both the maker's poor quality and my hard lesson.
If I were to buy a low end pipe it would be with the expectation that it is low end because it had issues. Finish, flaws, poor plumbing, poor fitting, etc. It is a cheap pipe for a reason (and yes, my definition of a cheap pipe has evolved over the years) and if I expected a pipe free of significant issues I would also expect to pay for it.
I have a few low end pipes that I bought many years ago to fill out a beginner's rotation or more recently just for the fun of restoring. All of them are now decent smokers but all have been reworked to some extent, sometimes very significantly reworked. Would it ever occur to me to ask a retailer to create a silk purse from what I knowingly purchased as an inexpensive sow's ear? Why would he waste valuable shop time that way? That's my job.
One time, about 35 years ago, I bought an amazing pipe in my favorite shape, the grain was astonishing. The first time I smoked it a problem developed that was clearly related to a hidden flaw. The retailer and maker's rep saw to it that the pipe was replaced with one very similar. Was I happy? Not really, the original was a one in a million, but they were more than fair and did all that I could have reasonably asked for. If it had not been such a high end pipe I would have written it off to experience, patched it and smoked on.
Anyway, that's the way I see it right now. If you think I'm off base write it off to the fact that I'm sitting in a hospital bed in pain and hopped up on pain meds.
If I were to buy a low end pipe it would be with the expectation that it is low end because it had issues. Finish, flaws, poor plumbing, poor fitting, etc. It is a cheap pipe for a reason (and yes, my definition of a cheap pipe has evolved over the years) and if I expected a pipe free of significant issues I would also expect to pay for it.
I have a few low end pipes that I bought many years ago to fill out a beginner's rotation or more recently just for the fun of restoring. All of them are now decent smokers but all have been reworked to some extent, sometimes very significantly reworked. Would it ever occur to me to ask a retailer to create a silk purse from what I knowingly purchased as an inexpensive sow's ear? Why would he waste valuable shop time that way? That's my job.
One time, about 35 years ago, I bought an amazing pipe in my favorite shape, the grain was astonishing. The first time I smoked it a problem developed that was clearly related to a hidden flaw. The retailer and maker's rep saw to it that the pipe was replaced with one very similar. Was I happy? Not really, the original was a one in a million, but they were more than fair and did all that I could have reasonably asked for. If it had not been such a high end pipe I would have written it off to experience, patched it and smoked on.
Anyway, that's the way I see it right now. If you think I'm off base write it off to the fact that I'm sitting in a hospital bed in pain and hopped up on pain meds.