700-800 pounds is not actually that steep, considering that for a more recente vintage tobacco tin one can easily pay a few hundred EUR. I wonder if it's smokable ..
I would never pay anywhere near that for any kind of tobacco.700-800 pounds is not actually that steep
I would never pay anywhere near that for any kind of tobacco.
I guess C & D cellar series(?) is shooting for just the right amount of time to cellar, not too long, not too short.One of the founders of American Spirit found some rustica in an ancient dig, and is the one accredited with bringing back the rustica strain.
Our museum here has some pottery with tobacco still in it.
But, I’m pretty sure obtaining some of these “oldest” tobaccos would be costly and probably very disappointing to smoke.
I’ve had the honor of trying a few 50+ year old commercial blends that weren’t really all that great. But, it was neat to find that older blends were much stronger in nicotine.
It’s probably safe to say that 20 years is about the peak for tobacco aging. After that, and it’s past it’s prime.
I think the cellar series is just a gimmick. It takes the responsibility for providing to the consumer tobacco blends at their optimal condition for smoking, which is how the quality blenders operated, and put it on the consumer to do the aging. The blender doesn't have to babysit their blends for years under ideal aging conditions while tying up their money. He can push out "green" blends at full price, and market on the back of the cellaring craze.I guess C & D cellar series(?) is shooting for just the right amount of time to cellar, not too long, not too short.
can I helpCertainly not the oldest in the world, I have a 1974 Erinmore Cube Cut tin, still vacuum sealed, I plan on smoking.
I’ll let you know how it tastes when I smoke it, which will probably be for the New Year. ??
View attachment 57125
Keep me in mind if you decide to sell a few of those please.Sealed 'cutter top' tins from the 1930s tend to be interesting but they fade very quickly after opening unless sealed in a jar and then consumed. I smoked a 1910 'cutter top' tin with Papipe the other year that was truly amazing, fresh, enjoyable and cube cut strangely enough. I have a bunch of 'cutter tops' that I must get around to offering for sale from the 1940/50s one of these days since they are not blends I will ever smoke. Are they worth the money? I wouldn't pay a lot for them, although the Chinese buyers go crazy over them according to Pipe Studd. Each to his own I guess.
FDA and the WHO are wrong about tobacco.
Old sushi isn't good, so why should old tobacco be?
I agree, and taking this argument to it's logical next step, should add that anyone who becomes ill from tobacco use should not receive any kind of medical assistance that they cannot cover out of pocket. No medical insurance coverage at all. No cost or burden to others based on our choices.FDA and the WHO are wrong about tobacco. Yes, it may kill you but it would seem that everyone should be free to choose the manner of their dying. Of course in this one should be prepared to be overruled by a confluence of unforeseen events or the whim of transcendent Being.
Life is far from easy. If one chooses to manage this difficulty by tobacco addiction and thereby freely chooses to perhaps live less well or less long, who is to say that what is lost is not overbalanced by the joy of smoking?
Who knows, and how is it that you feel you are empowered to make decisions for me?
I have enjoyed spectacular ancient Edgeworth as well. It's Burley. Of course it's going to survive. The other varietals, not so much.I recall smoking from a newly opened large key top tin of Edgeworth ready Rubbed, supposed to be from 1948. It was pretty damned good.
Mike S.
I agree, and taking this argument to it's logical next step, should add that anyone who becomes ill from tobacco use should not receive any kind of medical assistance that they cannot cover out of pocket. No medical insurance coverage at all. No cost or burden to others based on our choices.
A large part of what's been driving the anti smoking movement has been the costs associated with smoking, about 30 to 40 billion dollars annually. By removing any underwritten costs, such as medical insurance, that number gets reduced significantly. Making smoking as a firing offense should cover the enormous labor cost. Now you are truly free to practice freedom of choice without interference from the smoke Nazis.
If you disagree with this then you are arguing that the state, or society, does have a right to make demands since they are also being required to cover the economic ripple effects of smoking.