I've written about the above a few times. My hypothesis is that A.) It'll never happen and B) if it did, there'd still be tons of arguments. Here's the test:Don’t get me wrong, I like fine pipes, but would like to see blind smoke tests from some of the pipe “experts” comparing reasonably priced pipes like Rossi, Gigi, Chacom, Brigham, etc., with Castello, Dunhill, Chonowitsch, Manduela, etc. While you often “get what you pay for”, like appliances, tool, cars, etc., I suspect that this “generally” don’t apply to reputable pipe makers. Appearance is obviously something separate, hence, the blind... and garners its own worth.
Take evenly smoked, same chamber size of each example, machine smoke them all on the same neutral tobacco for two weeks. Clean them, put them in the machine: All the pipes would be out of sight, and the smoker would pick up one attached tube after another to try to identify the pipe and rate the smoke. Among them would also be a few low end factory pieces.
I submit that very few pipes would be identified. Those that were, mostly chance , The quality of the smoke would be the same for them all, cutting out all brands, nomenclature, looks, feel and weight, emotional attachment or revulsion.