You've got me beat by 30 pounds. I was always baseball, track, soccer, and basketball.144 pounds
You've got me beat by 30 pounds. I was always baseball, track, soccer, and basketball.144 pounds
They forgot to entertain in favor of advocating.The money has to go somewhere, why not the players who sacrifice most of their lives and well being to the sport?
I watch PGA golf and that's it. I will not support any of their lame agendas. All but golf is it... ??They forgot to entertain in favor of advocating.
That's why I'm such a fan of Kurt Russell. He said a celebrity's job is to be a court jester and entertain.I watch PGA golf and that's it. I will not support any of their lame agendas. All but golf is it... ??
Most of their lives were spent, as kids, playing a kids' game. Well, until they signed deals to play minor league or college ball. So, they have been well paid for basically risking nothing. Oh sure one fatality I know of and some concussions, torn muscles and the like. But, they know the risk-reward and, like smokers, chose the "game.". For most, the rewards are few. For more than a few the rewards are phenomenal. I don't begrudge the money they make but, the ones risking moneys are the owners. So, the moneys should mostly, and justly, go to those taking the financial risk, shareholders and individual owners.The money has to go somewhere, why not the players who sacrifice most of their lives and well being to the sport?
Fair pointOne can do both. I watch or listen to competition events to see people at the top of any discipline do their thing. A bunch of 40 year olds playing a game of baseball at the local park, while fun, isn’t the same as watching what’s capable at a professional level.
Two different experiences that serve very different objectives.
So this is obviously a polarizing subject. Anyone read the linked article? Thoughts on what the author has to say about the chances of longevity of the game?
Participation trophies? ?make sure every team is in the playoffs
Hey, if the pace of baseball is now too fast, may I suggest test cricket? That’s what I follow strangely enough as an American.I love baseball. It's the only sport I can put up with, and am a big Dodgers fan. However, I haven't watched in a while, mainly because the games are on a 3am (UK time), so it's a bit difficult, and also, it's not been quite the same without Vin Scully.
As for the article. I kind of disagree. Sure fitness and analytics have changed the game, and it's inevitable that they would do so and are here to stay. But universal DH? Live Replay? Putting a timer on the pitchers to improve the 'pace of the game'? And sure, let's make sure every team is in the playoffs. I am a thorough conservative in this area, and pretty much hate all of these 'innovations'.
Having a DH league and non-DH made it more fun. And I liked the fact that umpires could screw up, their individuality added to things. And who cares about 'pace of play'? It's baseball, it's not meant to be fast. As for the ever expanding post season? Just skip the leagues and get straight to it then.
In the 15 years I've been watching it, the game has changed at a quicker pace than it ever has since probably the spitball era, and that kind of pace just ain't baseball.
Participation trophies? ?
Hey, if the pace of baseball is now too fast, may I suggest test cricket? That’s what I follow strangely enough as an American.
Your headphones are in the mail?Shh! Rob Manfred might hear you.
Agree, something good about the sound of a game, I don’t mind putting it on the radio sometimes. It’s relaxingLove ️! I prefer listening to the game on the ? in the background to whatever I’m doing…usually smoking a pipe. ?️
Like baseball, cricket does have a sense of belonging to a different era and pace of life. I like listening to it in the same way I enjoy listening to a baseball game in the background while smoking a pipe in the backyard.Shh! Rob Manfred might hear you.
Funnily enough, I can't stand cricket.