Beautiful pipe!Whoops - left out the 2020 POTY which I referenced above. Looking at it closer, I guess it's not all that close to CP's pipe.
![]()
The grain on their blasts have definitely been improving. I hope they can get better consistency on their general shaping. Some are spot on, others slight off, and still others absolutely horrendous.The Charles Peterson pipe would be so nice with a sandblast. I'm seeing a lot of nice grain/blast on Petersons lately. Just yesterday I was pretty much forced to pick up this 307 because of how pretty it is. I'd dig a 308, but not gonna lie, I think I prefer the 307. View attachment 372591View attachment 372593
I've noticed this too. Some examples I've looked at I can't believe it passed QA and made it to the retailer.The grain on their blasts have definitely been improving. I hope they can get better consistency on their general shaping. Some are spot on, others slight off, and still others absolutely horrendous.
What fantastic curvature on that bowl! I agree, some of the sandblasting is truly beautiful.The Charles Peterson pipe would be so nice with a sandblast. I'm seeing a lot of nice grain/blast on Petersons lately. Just yesterday I was pretty much forced to pick up this 307 because of how pretty it is. I'd dig a 308, but not gonna lie, I think I prefer the 307. View attachment 372591View attachment 372593
I agree not huge by any means. But I would like one in a x105 size maybe even a 102 also.I was actually surprised that the 444 is about the size of a 106. Not large at all. I was expecting a larger pipe like my Merchant Service foursquare.
View attachment 372887
This is a beautiful pipe. I don't own any Petersons yet, but I'm been tempted a few times. Very niceJust picked up one of the Harp 444's and a sandblasted 309 and loving them quite a lot. Glad to see Peterson reaching back into their old catalog for new releases. I'd really love to see a nice, big Dublin come some time soon. The 120 is just too small for me. I'd love them to do the old school A4 or one of the B16/47/57 shapes. What would you like to see re-released by Peterson?
View attachment 371787
I’ll take two! Good looking p-lip on the 687! They like to over buff them nowadaysYeah 102 size would be just right.
Shape 687 is on the bottom and 444 on top. Photo from Lance Dahl.
View attachment 372893
Yeah for real. It's a damn shame.I’ll take two! Good looking p-lip on the 687! They like to over buff them nowadays
Thankfully, now that the 309 is back in production, they have a much easier opportunity for another crack at the 4AB (God willing). Perhaps there's a fitting anniversary coming up like Basil Rathbone's 130th birthday or something along those lines.It was funny when they claimed to be replicating his pipe with the 140th Anniversary pipe. Also curious the way they replicated the 4AB, also not paying much attention to the shank or band. 'Tribute' pipes maybe, but hardly replications. I'd like to see CP's pipe with a proper silver band, and a 4AB with a proper bell-shaped ferrule. A 308 with a super-fat shank like some of them had, along with the fat bell ferrule, would be really special.
Also, a properly-done 777 or real swan-neck 160X - the 160-ish 2023 POTY was a good tribute though.
My PPN POTY has some off-shaping for sure. I don't mind too much, it's unique, but still a shame in principle. However I do adore the new sandblasts. Incredibly comfortable to hold, not just pretty.The grain on their blasts have definitely been improving. I hope they can get better consistency on their general shaping. Some are spot on, others slight off, and still others absolutely horrendous.